EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 214 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 214 (2025) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 214, 2025
CIFEM’2024 - 4e édition du Colloque International sur la Formation et l’Enseignement des Mathématiques et des Sciences & Techniques
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 13
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521401002
Published online 28 March 2025
  1. R. J. Sternberg, The Nature of Human Creativity, Cambridge University Press, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Bereiter, M. Scardamalia, The Psychology of Written Composition, Routledge, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Bereiter, M. Scardamalia, Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise, Open Court Publishing, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, L. B. Forcier, Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education, Pearson Education, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Li, Y. Wang, Artificial Intelligence in Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges, Springer, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Li, Y. Wang, Exploring AI-Powered Language Learning: A Review of Current Applications, Taylor & Francis, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Warschauer, Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide, MIT Press, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Selwyn, Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, Bloomsbury Academic, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Williamson, Big Data in Education: The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice, SAGE Publications, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. D. S. Bouhlila, “The Quality of Secondary Education in the Middle East and North Africa: What Can We Learn from TIMSS’ Results?”, J. Educ., (2011). [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Boudarbat, “Earnings and Education in Morocco: Evidence from the 1999-2001 Moroccan Living Standards Measurement Study Panel”, Middle East Dev. J., (2008). [Google Scholar]
  12. R. El Amrani, B. Bensaid, Artificial Intelligence in Moroccan Education: Pedagogical Implications and Challenges, Springer, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. W. Creswell, C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, SAGE Publications, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, SAGE Publications, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Braun, V. Clarke, “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”, Qual. Res. Psychol., 3, 77–101, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Braun, V. Clarke, “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis”, Qual. Res. Sport Exerc. Health, 11, 589–597, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. L. A. Palinkas, S. M. Horwitz, C. A. Green, J. P. Wisdom, N. Duan, K. Hoagwood, “Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research”, Adm. Policy Ment. Health, 42, 533–544, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, SAGE Publications, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Kvale, S. Brinkmann, InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, SAGE Publications, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Kvale, Doing Interviews, SAGE Publications, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Silverman, Interpreting Qualitative Data, SAGE Publications, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. R. E. Boyatzis, Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, SAGE Publications, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Orb, L. Eisenhauer, D. Wynaden, “Ethics in Qualitative Research”, J. Nurs. Scholarsh., 33, 9396, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Eisenhauer, A. Orb, D. Wynaden, “Qualitative Research and Ethical Considerations”, Nurs. Inq., (2001). [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Wynaden, A. Orb, L. Eisenhauer, “Research Ethics and Participant Consent in Qualitative Research”, J. Adv. Nurs., (2001). [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Babbie, The Practice of Social Research, Cengage Learning, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. S. Lincoln, E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry, SAGE Publications, (1985). [Google Scholar]
  28. E. G. Guba, Y. S. Lincoln, “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research”, in Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), SAGE Publications, 105–117, (1994). [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Q. Patton, “Enhancing the Quality and Credibility of Qualitative Analysis”, Health Serv. Res., 34, 1189, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  30. R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, SAGE Publications, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  31. J. W. Creswell, A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods Research, SAGE Publications, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  32. K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Crown Business, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  33. E. M. Bender, T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, S. Shmitchell, “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?”, FAccT ‘21: Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness Account. Transpar., 610–623, (2021). DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445922 [Google Scholar]
  34. R. B. Kozma, “The Technological Revolution in Education: Current Trends and Future Perspectives”, Int. J. Educ. Technol., (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.