EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 222 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 222 (2025) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 222, 2025
2025 3rd International Conference on Education, Psychology and Cultural Communication (ICEPCC 2025)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Social, Cultural, and Familial Influences on Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522203005
Published online 17 September 2025
  1. C. L. Martin, D. N. Ruble, J. Szkrybalo, Cognitive theories of early gender development. Psychol. Bull. 128, 903–933 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Bussey, A. Bandura, Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychol. Rev. 106, 676–713 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. H. Eagly, V. J. Steffen, Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46, 735–754 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. E. Heilman, Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32, 113–135 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  5. C, Leaper, C. K. Friedman. The Socialization of Gender. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research, 561–587 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. L. Martin, D. Ruble, Children’s Search for Gender Cues: Cognitive Perspectives on Gender Development. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13, 67–70 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Kohlberg. A cognitive developmental analysis of children’s sex role concepts and attitudes. In Maccoby E.C. (ed.), the development of sex differences, 82-173 (1966) [Google Scholar]
  8. D. N. Ruble, C. L. Martin, S. A. Berenbaum. Gender Development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development 6th ed., 858–932 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. L. Halim, D. Ruble, C. Tamis‑LeMonda, P. E. Shrout, Rigidity in gender‑typed behaviors in early childhood: A longitudinal study of ethnic minority children. Child Dev. 84, 1269–1284 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. S. Bigler, L. S. Liben, Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 162–166 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. L. Halim, D. N. Ruble, D. M. Amodio, From Pink Frilly Dresses to One of the Boys: A Social‑Cognitive Analysis of Gender Identity Development and Gender Bias. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 5, 933–949 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Spinner, L. Cameron, R. M. Calogero, Peer Toy Play as a Gateway to Children’s Gender Flexibility: The Effect of (Counter)Stereotypic Portrayals of Peers in Children’s Magazines. Sex Roles 79, 314–328 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Lytton, D. M. Romney. Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 109, 267–296 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. J. Endendijk, M. G. Groeneveld, J. Mesman, The Gendered Family Process Model: An Integrative Framework of Gender in the Family. Arch. Sex. Behav. 47, 877–904 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. E. S. Weisgram, M. Fulcher, L. M. Dinella, Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender‑typed colors on preschool children’s toy preferences. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 35, 401–409 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. M. Coyne, J. R. Linder, E. E. Rasmussen, D. A. Nelson, V. Birkbeck, Pretty as a Princess: Longitudinal effects of engagement with Disney princesses on gender stereotypes, body esteem, and prosocial behavior in children. Child Dev. 87, 1909–1925 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. J. Endendijk, M. G. Groeneveld, L. D. van der Pol, S. R. van Berkel, E. T. Hallers‑Haalboom, M. J. Bakermans‑Kranenburg, J. Mesman, Gender differences in child aggression: Relations with gender‑differentiated parenting and parents’ gender‑role stereotypes. Child Dev. 88, 299–316 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Wang, Z. Yu, Gender‑moderated effects of academic self‑concept on achievement, motivation, performance, and self‑efficacy: A systematic review. Front. Psychol. 14, 1136141 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. M. Koenig, A. H. Eagly, Evidence for the Social Role Theory of Stereotype Content: Observations of Groups’ Roles Shape Stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 107, 371–392 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Cvencek, A. N. Meltzoff, A. G. Greenwald, Math–Gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children. Child Dev. 82, 766–779 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Bian, S-J. Leslie, A. Cimpian, Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science 355, 389–391 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. King, A. Scovelle, A. Meehl, A. J. Milner, Gender stereotypes and biases in early childhood: A systematic review. Australas. J. Early Childhood 46, 112–125 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. L. Halim, D. N. Ruble, C. S. Tamis‑LeMonda, P. E. Shrout, D. M. Amodio, Gender attitudes in early childhood: Behavioral consequences and cognitive antecedents. Child Dev. 87, 882–899 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. L. Halim, D. Ruble. Gender Identity and Stereotyping in Early and Middle Childhood. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology, Vol. 1. Gender research in general and experimental psychology, 495-525 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. R. L. Blumberg, The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks. Prospects 38, 345–361 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Unterhalter, A. North, M. Arnot, C. Lloyd, L. Moletsane, E. Murphy‑Graham, J. Parkes, M. Saito, Interventions to enhance girls’ education and gender equality: Education rigorous literature review. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a089bae5274a31e0000230/Girls_Edu cation_Literature_Review_2014_Unterhalter.pdf [Google Scholar]
  27. K. L. Mulvey, M. Killen, Challenging gender stereotypes: resistance and exclusion. Child Dev. 86, 681–694 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.