EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 222 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 222 (2025) 03012 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 222, 2025
2025 3rd International Conference on Education, Psychology and Cultural Communication (ICEPCC 2025)
Article Number 03012
Number of page(s) 7
Section Social, Cultural, and Familial Influences on Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522203012
Published online 17 September 2025
  1. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  2. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. Pursuing Pleasure or Virtue: The Differential and Overlapping Well-Being Benefits of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. Tandler, N., Krauss, A., & Proyer, R. T. Authentic Happiness at Work: Self-and Peer-Rated Orientations to Happiness, Work Satisfaction, and Stress Coping. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1931–1931 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. Sun, W., Liu, L., Zheng, Z., Jiang, Y., & Fang, P. Why eudemonia bring more happiness: The multiple mediating roles of meaning of life and emotions. Current Psychology, 42(22), 18749+ (2023). [Google Scholar]
  5. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multi-cultural Validation Studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  6. Ekinci, N., & Koç, H. Grit, general self‐efficacy, and life satisfaction: The mediating role of hope. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3), 1288–1299 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  7. Aristotle. (2014). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. (R. Crisp, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huta, V. (2015). Positive psychology in practice: promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life (Second edition.). Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeng, Z., & Chen, H. Distinct associations of hedonic and eudaimonic motives with well-being: Mediating role of self-control. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 1–9 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  10. Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., & Giammarco, E. A. Relationships between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 58–60 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Jia, N., Li, W., Zhang, L., & Kong, F. Beneficial effects of hedonic and eudaimonic motivations on subjective well-being in adolescents: a two-wave cross-lagged analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(5), 701–707 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Asano, R., Tsukamoto, S., Igarashi, T., & Huta, V. Psychometric properties of measures of hedonic and eudaimonic orientations in Japan: The HEMA scale. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 40(1), 390–401 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. Asano, R., Igarashi, T., & Tsukamoto, S. The Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities: Measurement Invariance and Psychometric Properties in an Adult Japanese Sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1220 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. Giuntoli, L., Condini, F., Ceccarini, F., Huta, V., & Vidotto, G. The Different Roles of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities in Predicting Functioning and Well-Being Experiences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(4), 1657–1671 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  15. Lacombe, M., Tanzini, E., & O’Neill, S. Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives: Associations with Academic Achievement and Negative Emotional States Among Urban College Students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(5), 1323–1341 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, Y., Li, P., & Kou, Y. Orientations to Happiness and Subjective Well-Being in Chinese Adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 10(4), 881–897 (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.