EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 223 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 223 (2025) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 223, 2025
Malaysia-China International Conference on Educational Development (MICED 2025)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522301001
Published online 02 October 2025
  1. M. F. Shahzad, S. Xu, and H. Zahid, “Exploring the impact of generative AI-based technologies on learning performance through self-efficacy, fairness & ethics, creativity, and trust in higher education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1–26, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12949-9. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. N. Yakubu, N. David, and N. H. Abubakar, “Students’ behavioural intention to use content generative AI for learning and research: A UTAUT theoretical perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., no. 0123456789, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13441-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. F. Shahzad, S. Xu, X. An, H. Zahid, and M. Asif, “Learning and Teaching in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technologies: An In-Depth Exploration Using Multi-Analytical SEM-ANN Approach,” Eur. J. Educ., pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.70050. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. F. Shahzad, S. Xu, H. Liu, and H. Zahid, “Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT-4) and Social Media Impact on Academic Performance and Psychological Well-Being in China’s Higher Education,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, p. e12835, 2025, doi: 10.1111/ejed.12835. [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Gao, J. H. Cheah, X. J. Lim, and X. Luo, “Enhancing academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactiveconstructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, p. 100958, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. M. Al-Abdullatif, “Modeling Teachers’ Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education: The Role of AI Literacy, Intelligent TPACK, and Perceived Trust,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14111209. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Perifanou and A. A. Economides, “Collaborative Uses of GenAI Tools in Project-Based Learning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15030354. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. A. El-Sabagh, “Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  9. M. A. Qureshi, A. Khaskheli, J. A. Qureshi, S. A. Raza, and S. Q. Yousufi, “Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–21, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Bayaga, “Leveraging AI-enhanced and emerging technologies for pedagogical innovations in higher education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., pp. 1045–1072, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13122-y. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Budhathoki, A. Zirar, E. T. Njoya, and A. Timsina, “ChatGPT adoption and anxiety: a crosscountry analysis utilising the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT),” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 831–846, 2024, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2024.2333937. [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Hu, H. Wang, and Y. Xin, “Factors influencing Chinese pre-service teachers’ adoption of generative AI in teaching: an empirical study based on UTAUT2 and PLS-SEM,” Educ. Inf. Technol., 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13353-7. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Zhang, J. Abbas, M. F. Shahzad, A. Shankar, S. Ercisli, and D. C. Dobhal, “Association between social media use and students ’ academic performance through family bonding and collective learning : The moderating role of mental wellbeing,” Educ. Inf. Technol., 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12407-y. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. F. H. Jr, M. C. Howard, and C. Nitzl, “Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 109, pp. 101–110, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Al-Emran et al., Evaluating the influence of generative AI on students’ academic performance through the lenses of TPB and TTF using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Springer US, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s10639-025-13485-w. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.