EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 227 (2026) SHS Web Conf., 227 (2026) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 227, 2026
The 6th International Conference on Communication and Business (ICCB 2025)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 18
Section Digital Communication, Media, and Cultural Representation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202622703002
Published online 09 January 2026
  1. We Are Social and Meltwater, “Overview of Social Media Use,” Digital 2024 July Global Statshot Report, 2024. https://datareportal.com/global-digital-overview. [Google Scholar]
  2. We Are Social and Meltwater, “Digital 2024: Indonesia,” 2024. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia (accessed Apr. 17, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  3. S. L. Grau, Celebrity 2.0: The Role of Social Media Influencer Marketing in Building Brands. New York: Business Expert Press, LLC, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. N. S. Borchers, The Influencer Industry: The Quest for Authenticity on Social Media. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Leban and B. G. Voyer, “Social media influencers versus traditional influencers Roles and consequences for traditional marketing campaigns,” in Influencer Marketing: Building Brand Communities and Engagement, S. Yesiloglu and J. Costello, Eds. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. P. Schouten, L. Janssen, and M. Verspaget, “Celebrity vs. Influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and Product-Endorser fit,” Int. J. Advert., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 258–281, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898. [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Breves and N. Liebers, “#Greenfluencing. The Impact of Parasocial Relationships with Social Media Influencers on Advertising Effectiveness and Followers’ Pro-environmental Intentions,” Environ. Commun., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 773–787, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17524032.2022.2109708. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. T. P. M. Le, P. Van Nguyen, and P. Stokes, “Green influencers and consumers’ decoupling behaviors for parasocial relationships and sustainability. A comparative study between Korea and Vietnam,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 84, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104256. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Nurhayati-Wolff, “Influencer marketing in Indonesia statistics & facts,” Statista, 2024. https://www.statista.com/topics/7090/influencer-marketing-in-indonesia/#topicHeaderwrapper. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Kara and M. K. Min, “Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: influencers and moderators,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 2. pp. 124–142, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/13527600710745714/full/html. [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Wuragil, “Hari Lingkungan Hidup Sedunia, Klaster Filantropi Konservasi Tanam 3 Ribu Pohon di 18 Provinsi,” Tempo, 2024. https://www.tempo.co/lingkungan/hari-lingkungan-hidup-sedunia-klaster-filantropi-konservasi-tanam-3-ribu-pohon-di-18-provinsi-49142. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. S. Kapoor, A. Tagore, and S. Dua, “Social Media Influencer Promoted Sustainable Fashion: Effects of Sponsorship and Benefit Association,” J. Promot. Manag., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 461–490, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10496491.2022.2163034. [Google Scholar]
  13. J.-S. Horng, C. H. Liu, S. F. Chou, T. Y. Yu, and D. C. Hu, “Role of social media influencers on marketing of sustainable hotels: gratification and the parasocial interaction perspective,” J. Hosp. Mark. Manag., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 735–762, 2024, doi: 10.1080/19368623.2024.2315947. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Graham-Rowe, D. C. Jessop, and P. Sparks, “Self-affirmation theory and pro-environmental behaviour: Promoting a reduction in household food waste,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 62, pp. 124–132, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.003. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Horton and R. R. Wohl, “Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction,” Psychiatry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 215–229, 1956, doi: 10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Horton and A. Strauss, “Interaction in audience-participation shows,” Am. J. Sociol., no. 62, pp. 579–587, 1957, doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/222106. [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Hartmann and C. Goldhoorn, “Horton and Wohl revisited: Exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction,” J. Commun., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1104–1121, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x. [Google Scholar]
  18. J. E. Lee and B. Watkins, “YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 5753–5760, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Sokolova and H. Kefi, “Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 53, no. September 2018, p. 101742, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Rungruangjit, “What drives Taobao live streaming commerce? The role of parasocial relationships, congruence and source credibility in Chinese consumers’ purchase intentions,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09676. [Google Scholar]
  21. J. P. G. Lacap, M. R. M. Cruz, A. J. Bayson, R. Molano, and J. G. Garcia, “Parasocial relationships and social media interactions: building brand credibility and loyalty,” Spanish J. Mark. ESIC, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 77–97, 2024, doi: 10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0190. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Yousaf, “Food vloggers and parasocial interactions: a comparative study of local and foreign food vlogs using the S-O-R paradigm,” Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 3525–3549, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-09-2021-1090. [Google Scholar]
  23. W.-K. Chen, P. H. Silaban, W. E. Hutagalung, and A. D. K. Silalahi, “How Instagram Influencers Contribute to Consumer Travel Decision: Insights from SEM and fsQCA,” Emerg. Sci. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16–37, 2023, doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-01-02. [Google Scholar]
  24. O. C. Yılmazdoğan, R. Ş. Doğan, and E. Altıntaş, “The impact of the source credibility of Instagram influencers on travel intention: The mediating role of parasocial interaction,” J. Vacat. Mark., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 299–313, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1356766721995973. [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Zhao, H. Shen, and Y. Zhang, “The study on the impact of short video tourism Vloggers at social media platform on online sharing intention,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905002. [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Liu, “Virtual presence, real connections: Exploring the role of parasocial relationships in virtual idol fan community participation,” Glob. Media China, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.1177/20594364231222976. [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. X. Ong, T. Sun, and N. Ito, “Beyond Influencer Credibility: The Power of Content and Parasocial Relationship on Processing Social Media Influencer Destination Marketing Campaigns,” in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2022, J. L. Stienmetz, B. Ferrer-Rosell, and D. Massimo, Eds. Springer, 2022, pp. 110–122. [Google Scholar]
  28. T. D. P. Mai, A. T. To, T. H. M. Trinh, T. T. Nguyen, and T. T. T. Le, “Para-Social Interaction and Trust in Live-Streaming Sellers,” Emerg. Sci. J., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 744–754, 2023, doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-06. [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Chung and H. Cho, “Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 481–495, 2017, doi: 10.1002/mar.21001. [Google Scholar]
  30. C. Lawrence and B. Meivitawanli, “The Role of Parasocial Relationships, Congruence and Source Credibility in Indonesia: A Study on Tiktok Live Streaming Commerce in the Cosmetics Industry,” Australas. Accounting, Bus. Financ. J., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 39–51, 2023, doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v17i5.05. [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Xu, B. J. Cui, and B. Lyu, “Influence of Streamer’s Social Capital on Purchase Intention in Live Streaming E-Commerce,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. January, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748172. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. S. Lim, M.-J. J. Choe, J. Zhang, and G.-Y. Y. Noh, “The role of wishful identification, emotional engagement, and parasocial relationships in repeated viewing of live-streaming games: A social cognitive theory perspective,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 108, no. February, p. 106327, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106327. [Google Scholar]
  33. M. H. Dewantara, X. Jin, and S. Gardiner, “What makes a travel vlog attractive? Parasocial interactions between travel vloggers and viewers,” J. Vacat. Mark., pp. 1–17, 2023, doi: 10.1177/13567667231186554. [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Feng, H. Chen, and Q. Kong, “An expert with whom i can identify: the role of narratives in influencer marketing,” Int. J. Advert., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 972–993, 2021, doi: 10.1080/02650487.2020.1824751. [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Lou, S. S. Tan, and X. Chen, “Investigating Consumer Engagement with Influencervs. Brand-Promoted Ads: The Roles of Source and Disclosure,” J. Interact. Advert., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 169–186, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15252019.2019.1667928. [Google Scholar]
  36. T. Cui, S. Tang, and Q. Iqbal, “The role of green influencers on users’ green consumption intention: an empirical study from China and Pakistan,” Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist., 2024, doi: 10.1108/APJML-05-2024-0561. [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Sharma, P. Singh, and A. Sharma, “Unleashing Green Beauty Crusade: Role of Influencer Relational Characteristics, Product Perceptions, and Warm Glow,” J. Electron. Commer. Res., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 223–241, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85209376765&partnerID=40&md5=6fa564938797989aed39a670d04311cc. [Google Scholar]
  38. H. Knupfer, A. Neureiter, and Jörg Matthes, “From social media diet to public riot? Engagement with ‘greenfluencers’ and young social media users’ environmental activism,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 139, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107527. [Google Scholar]
  39. Z. Xu, T. Islam, X. Liang, N. Akhtar, and M. Shahzad, “‘I’m like you, and I like what you like’ sustainable food purchase influenced by vloggers: A moderated serial-mediation model,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 63, no. August, p. 102737, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102737. [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Luo, M. Nie, and H. Ji, “The Influence of Internet Celebrities’ Expertise and Attraction on Residents’ Intention to Purchase Household Energy-Saving Products in the Context of an Online Community,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16083332. [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Conde and B. Casais, “Micro, macro and mega-influencers on instagram: The power of persuasion via the parasocial relationship,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 158, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113708. [Google Scholar]
  42. S. V. Jin and A. Muqaddam, “‘Fame and Envy 2.0’ in luxury fashion influencer marketing on Instagram: Comparison between mega-celebrities and micro-celebrities,” in International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 2021, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 176–200, doi: 10.1504/IJIMA.2021.114335. [Google Scholar]
  43. We Are Social and Meltwater, “Instagram : Advertising Audience Overview,” we are social, 2024. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-indonesia (accessed Feb. 12, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  44. G. Taslaud, “The Real Statistics Behind Influencer Marketing in Indonesia (2025 Analysis),” INSG, 2025. https://www.insg.co/en/influencer-marketing-indonesia/ (accessed Jun. 11, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  45. Meta, “Help Center Instagram,” 2025. https://help.instagram.com/179980294969821/?helpref=hc_fnav (accessed Feb. 12, 2025). [Google Scholar]
  46. I. Himelboim, S. Mccreery, and M. Smith, “Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 40–60, 2013, doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12001. [Google Scholar]
  47. Q. Tian and C. A. Hoffner, “Parasocial Interaction With Liked, Neutral, and Disliked Characters on a Popular TV Series,” Mass Commun. Soc., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 250–269, 2010, doi: 10.1080/15205430903296051. [Google Scholar]
  48. K. Eyal and A. M. Rubin, “Viewer Aggression and Homophily, Identification, and Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters,” J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 77–98, 2003, doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5. [Google Scholar]
  49. J. R. Turner, “Interpersonal and Psychological Predictors of Parasocial Interaction with Different Television Performers,” Commun. Q., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 443–453, 1993, doi: 10.1080/01463379309369904. [Google Scholar]
  50. K. Zhang, M. Zhang, and C. Li, “Effects of Celebrity Characteristics, Perceived Homophily, and Reverence on Consumer-Celebrity Para-Social Interaction and Brand Attitude,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, no. September, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711454. [Google Scholar]
  51. C. Hoffner, “Parasocial and Online Social Relationships,” in The Handbook of Children, Media, and Development, A. Cahn, T. Kalagian, and C. Lyon, Eds. 2008, pp. 309–333. [Google Scholar]
  52. A. Marwick and D. Boyd, “To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on twitter,” Convergence, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139–158, 2011, doi: 10.1177/1354856510394539. [Google Scholar]
  53. J. Ilicic and C. M. Wesbter, “Being True to Oneself: Investigating Celebrity Brand Authenticity,” Psychol. Trauma Theory, Res. Pract. Policy, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 410–420, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/23431/. [Google Scholar]
  54. N. L. Collins and L. C. Miller, “Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 457–475, 1994, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457. [Google Scholar]
  55. K. Greene, Valerian J. Derlega, and Alicia Mathews, “Self-disclosure in personal relationships,” Cambridge Handb. Pers. Relationships, vol. 22, no. April, pp. 409–427, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  56. S. Sprecher, S. Treger, J. D. Wondra, N. Hilaire, and K. Wallpe, “Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 860–866, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017. [Google Scholar]
  57. B. A. Bickart, S. (Julia) Kim, S. Pai, and F. F. Brunel, “How Social Media Influencers Build a Brand Following by Sharing Secrets,” in Strong brands, strong relationships, S. Fournier, M. Breazeale, and J. Avery, Eds. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  58. A. Ferchaud, J. Grzeslo, S. Orme, and J. LaGroue, “Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 80, pp. 88–96, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041. [Google Scholar]
  59. Y. Elsantil, S. B. Sekar, E. A. Hamza, and K. Bedair, “From promotion to prevention : the influence of de-influencers on sustainable consumer behavioral intentions,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, p., 2025, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2462271. [Google Scholar]
  60. J. Kim and H. Song, “Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 62, pp. 570–577, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083. [Google Scholar]
  61. F. P. Leite and P. de P. Baptista, “The effects of social media influencers’ self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 295–311, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275. [Google Scholar]
  62. M. Kim and J. Kim, “How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 111, no. May, p. 106419, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106419. [Google Scholar]
  63. K. Eyal, T. Te’eni-Harari, and K. Katz, “A content analysis of teen-favored celebrities’ posts on social networking sites: Implications for parasocial relationships and fame-valuation,” Cyberpsychology J. Psychosoc. Res. Cybersp., vol. 14, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.5817/cp2020-7. [Google Scholar]
  64. M. Abbati, Communicating the Environment to Save the Planet: A Journey into Eco-Communication. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  65. Z. Xu, T. Islam, X. Liang, N. Akhtar, and M. Shahzad, “‘I’m like you, and I like what you like’ sustainable food purchase influenced by vloggers: A moderated serial-mediation model,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 63, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102737. [Google Scholar]
  66. B. Bickart and R. M. Schindler, “Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information,” J. Interact. Mark., pp. 31–40, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1094996801701843. [Google Scholar]
  67. X. Dou, J. A. Walden, S. Lee, and J. Y. Lee, “Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1555–1563, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.015. [Google Scholar]
  68. J. Li and L. Zhan, “Online persuasion: How the written word drives WOM evidence from consumergenerated product reviews,” Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 51, no. 1. pp. 239–258, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-06494-005. [Google Scholar]
  69. American Psychological Association, “empathy,” American Psychological Association. https://dictionary.apa.org/empathy. [Google Scholar]
  70. H. Scherer, S. Diaz, N. Iannone, M. McCarty, S. Branch, and J. Kelly, “‘Leave Britney alone!’: parasocial relationships and empathy,” J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 128–142, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1997889. [Google Scholar]
  71. K. Hwang and Q. Zhang, “Influence of parasocial relationship between digital celebrities and their followers on followers’ purchase and electronic word-of-mouth intentions, and persuasion knowledge,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 87, pp. 155–173, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029. [Google Scholar]
  72. E. L. Frederick, C. H. Lim, G. Clavio, and P. Walsh, “Why We Follow: An Examination of Parasocial Interaction and Fan Motivations for Following Athlete Archetypes on Twitter,” Int. J. Sport Commun., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 481–502, 2016, doi: 10.1123/ijsc.5.4.481. [Google Scholar]
  73. Y. Shan, K. J. Chen, and J. S. Lin, “When social media influencers endorse brands: the effects of self-influencer congruence, parasocial identification, and perceived endorser motive,” Int. J. Advert., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 590–610, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02650487.2019.1678322. [Google Scholar]
  74. J. K. Ayeh, N. Au, and R. Law, “Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning,” Tour. Manag., vol. 35, pp. 132–143, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.06.010. [Google Scholar]
  75. T. Wulf, F. M. F. M. Schneider, and J. Queck, “Exploring Viewers’ Experiences of Parasocial Interactions with Videogame Streamers on Twitch,” Cyperpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 648–653, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0546. [Google Scholar]
  76. F. I. Anuar, A. A. A. Zaid, I. Z. Zabidi, and S. N. J. Kamal, “Young Tourists’ Trust in Instagram Travel Influencers and their Intention to Visit Travel Destinations,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 16, 2021, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i16/11236. [Google Scholar]
  77. M.-H. Li, “Exploring Short Video Application Users’ Visit Intention: Applying the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 15, no. 12, p. 8, 2019, doi: 10.5539/ass.v15n12p8. [Google Scholar]
  78. A. Z. Bahtar, “The Impact of Instagram Reels on Youths’ Trust and their Holiday Intention,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i1/15901. [Google Scholar]
  79. C. McLaughlin and D. Y. Wohn, “Predictors of parasocial interaction and relationships in live streaming,” Convergence, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1714–1734, 2021, doi: 10.1177/13548565211027807. [Google Scholar]
  80. A. M. Febrianti, N. Hermina, and M. Suratman, “Will you purchase what I recommend? The role of interaction orientation, parasocial relation, and product involvement,” Asian Manag. Bus. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 137–152, 2024, doi: 10.20885/ambr.vol4.iss1.art9. [Google Scholar]
  81. P. J. Auter, “TV That Talks Back: An Experimental Validation of a Parasocial Interaction Scale,” J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 173–181, 1992, doi: 10.1080/08838159209364165. [Google Scholar]
  82. L. I. Labrecque, “Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction,” J. Interact. Mark., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 134–148, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003. [Google Scholar]
  83. K. S. Thorson and S. Rodgers, “Relationships Between Blogs as EWOM and Interactivity, Perceived Interactivity, and Parasocial Interaction,” J. Interact. Advert., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 5–44, 2006, doi: 10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.