Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2026
10e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 07031 | |
| Number of page(s) | 14 | |
| Section | Linguistique et didactique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623207031 | |
| Published online | 15 June 2026 | |
- P. Crosthwaite, S. Sun, Generative AI and L2 Written Feedback Studies: A Scoping Review. RELC Journal, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251386530 [Google Scholar]
- R. Faigley, S. Witte, Analyzing Revision, (College Composition and Communication, Urbana, IL, 1981). [Google Scholar]
- D. Gile, Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training, (John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- J. R. Hayes, L. S. Flower, A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing, (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981). [Google Scholar]
- P. Hatiarová, AI in Interpreting Training. L10N Journal. 4(1), 45–66 (2025). https://l10njournal.net/index.php/home/article/view/48 [Google Scholar]
- J. Meyer, T. Jansen, R. Schiller, L.W. Liebenow, M. Steinbach, A. Horbach, J. Fleckens tein, Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 6, 100199 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- B. Mossop, Revising and Editing for Translators, (Routledge, London/New York, 2014). [Google Scholar]
- J.L. Parker, K. Becker, C. Carroca, ChatGPT for Automated Writing Evaluation in Scholarly Writing Instruction. J Nurs Educ. 62(12), (2023). [Google Scholar]
- F. Pöchhacker, Introducing Interpreting Studies, (Routledge, London/New York, 2004). [Google Scholar]
- P. Polakova, & P. Ivenz, The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education. 11(1) (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101 [Google Scholar]
- C. Setton, Simultaneous Interpretation: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis, (John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 1999). [Google Scholar]
- H. Shi, C. S. Chai, S. Zhou, S. Aubrey, Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2454541 [Google Scholar]
- J. Steiss, T. Tate, S. Graham, J. Cruz, M. Hebert, J. Wang, Y. Moon, W. Tseng, M. Warschauer, C. B. Olson, Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction. 91, 101894 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 [Google Scholar]
- C. Wadensjö, Interpreting as Interaction, (Longman, London/New York, 1998). [Google Scholar]
- S. Yeung, University students’ engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing. 68, 101203 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Zhan, Z. Yan, Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Early view. 1–14 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.