Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 235, 2026
2026 4th International Conference on Education, Psychology and Cultural Communication (ICEPCC 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Language Teaching, Learning, and Technology | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623502001 | |
| Published online | 30 June 2026 | |
- A. Jamalinesari, F. Rahimi, H. Gowhary, A. Azizifar, The effects of teacher-written direct vs indirect feedback on students’ writing. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 192, 116–123 (2015) [Google Scholar]
- H. Roothooft, A. Lázaro Ibarrola, B. Bulté, Task repetition and corrective feedback via models and direct corrections among young EFL writers: Draft quality and task motivation. Lang. Teach. Res. 29, 3 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- J. Truscott, The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Lang. Learn. 46, 2, 327–369 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- J. Zhu, X. Shi, S. Zhang, Machine learning-based grammar error detection method in English composition.Sci. Program. 2021, 1, 4213791 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- V. Verma, S. Sharma, Critical analysis of existing Punjabi grammar checker and a proposed hybrid framework involving machine learning and rule-base criteria. ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process. 21, 5, 1–27 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- P.R. Alapati, A. Swathi, J.N. Madhuri, V.K. Burugari, B. Pagidipati, Y.A.B. El Ebiary, et al., Improving English writing skills through NLP-driven error detection and correction systems. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 16, 2 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- J.D. Hou, J. The effects of metalinguistic written corrective feedback and their correlation with learners’ engagement. Zhejiang Int. Stud. Univ. (02), 31–40 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- J. Robert, N. Muscanell, M. McCormack, K. Pelletier, K. Arnold, N. Arbino, K. Young, J. Reeves, 2025 EDUCAUSE horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. EDUCAUSE Publ. (2025). [Google Scholar]
- Y. Su, Y. Lin, C. Lai, Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms. Assess. Writ. 57, 100752 (2023). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. Celik, M. Dindar, H. Muukkonen, S. Järvelä, The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends 66, 4, 616–630 (2022) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.