Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 207, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Digital Economy and Business Administration (ICDEBA 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04010 | |
Number of page(s) | 15 | |
Section | Global Trends, Public Policy, and Social Development | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420704010 | |
Published online | 10 December 2024 |
The Polarization of Public Opinion on Weibo about Public Affairs of People’s Livelihood in China
1 The School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, Hubei, 430073, China
2 School of Finance and Investment, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510600, China
3 Surrey International Institute, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian, Liaoning, 116025, China
4 School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430062, China
* Corresponding author: 211511343@m.gduf.edu.cn
Social media has become a key platform for public discussion and dissemination of social events but has also led to the Echo chamber effect and emotional polarization. This study uses the “Jiang Ping incident” as a case to explore emotional polarization in public opinion on Chinese social media platforms, specifically Weibo. The study first reviews relevant theories, including the Echo chamber effect, selective information preference, silence behavior, and opinion-emotional contagion. Then, using a questionnaire survey, empirical data were collected, and factor analysis was conducted to extract key common factors influencing emotional polarization. In the final regression analysis, the impact of these three common factors on the polarization of public opinion groups was further examined. The results show that selective information preference and opinion-emotional contagion have a significant negative impact on emotional polarization. Additionally, silence behavior was also found to have a negative impact on emotional polarization, suggesting that users’ silence behavior in the face of opposing opinions may exacerbate the degree of emotional polarization. Finally, the study provides recommendations for social media platform managers and policymakers to mitigate emotional confrontation on social media and promote more rational public discussion.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.