Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 26, 2016
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2015 (ERPA 2015)
Article Number 01032
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 26 April 2016
  1. Al-Harthy, S. I., & Was, C. A., Goals, efficacy and metacognitive self-regulation: A path analysis. International Journal of Education, 2, 1–20, (2010). [CrossRef]
  2. Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: n, (1986).
  3. Bandura, A., Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184, (1989). [CrossRef]
  4. Bandura, A., Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148, (1993). [CrossRef]
  5. Bandura, A., Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman, (1997).
  6. Bandura, A., A social cognitive theory of personality. In Pervin, L. & John, O. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York: Guilford Publications, (1999).
  7. Berger, J. L., & Karabenick, S. A., Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional influences in mathematics classrooms. Learning & Instruction, 21(3), 416–428, (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F., Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43(5), 485–499, (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. Cakici, Y., Aricak, O.T., & Ilgaz, G., Can “attitudes toward biology course” and “learning strategies” simultaneously predict achievement in biology? Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 31–48, (2011).
  10. Caliskan, I. S., The effect of inquiry-based chemistry course on students’ understanding of atom concept, learning approaches, motivation, self-efficacy and epistemological beliefs. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, (2004).
  11. DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M., Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 71–94, (1999). [CrossRef]
  12. DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M., Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 245–255, (2000). [CrossRef]
  13. Dembo, M. H., & Eaton, M. J., Self-regulation of academic learning in middle schools. The Elemantry School Journal, 100 (5), 473–490, (2000). [CrossRef]
  14. Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C., Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, (1983).
  15. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A., In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents’ academic achievement related-beliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225, (1995). [CrossRef]
  16. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A., Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132, (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Eggen, P., Kauchak, D., Educational Psychology: Windows on Classroom, Columbus Ohio: Merril, Prentice Hall, (1999).
  18. Entwistle, N., “Motivational factors in students’ approaches to learning”, In Schmeck, R. R. (Ed.) Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 21–49). New York: Plenum Press, (1988). [CrossRef]
  19. Fries, S., Schmid, S., Dietz, F., & Hofer, M., Conflicting values and their impact on learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 259–274, (2005). [CrossRef]
  20. Gabel, D. L., Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning A project of the National Science Teachers Association. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, (1994).
  21. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R., The effects of autonomy on motivation, use of learning strategies, and performance in the college classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA, (1991).
  22. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R., Assesing Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategies: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 18–22). San Francisco, CA: American Educational Research Association, (1995).
  23. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R., The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 477–486, (1996). [CrossRef]
  24. Graham, S., & Weiner, B., Theories and principles of motivation. In Berliner, D.& Calfee, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63–84). New York: Macmillan, (1996).
  25. Greenfield, T.A., An exploration of gender participation patterns in science competitions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(7), 735–748, (1995). [CrossRef]
  26. Johnsey, A., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M., Promoting generative learning in computer-based instruction through the use of elaboration strategies training. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 125–135, (1992). [CrossRef]
  27. Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, B.J., College students’ homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 1556–1623, (2009). [CrossRef]
  28. Landine, J., & Stewart, J., Relationship between metacognition, motivation, locus of control, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 32(3), 200–212, (1998).
  29. Lee, V.E. & Burkam, D.T., Gender differences in middle grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Science Education, 80(6), 613–50, (1996). [CrossRef]
  30. Lenon, J. M., Self-Efficacy In. Rosen, J. A., Glennie, E. J., Dalton, B. W., Lennon, J. M., & Bozick, R. N., Non-cognitive Skills in the Classroom: New Perspectives on Educational Research (s. 91–117). NC: Research Triangle International, (2010).
  31. Martin, M.O., Mullis, I.V.S., and Foy, P., TIMSS 2007 International Science Report: Findings From IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth and Fourth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, (2008).
  32. Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Burg, S., Gender and motivation. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 351–373, (2006). [CrossRef]
  33. Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W., Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38, (1991). [CrossRef]
  34. Ozkan, S., The roles of motivational beliefs and learning styles on tenth grade students’ biology achievement. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, (2003).
  35. Pajares, F., Assessing self-efficacy beliefs and academic outcomes: The case for specificity and correspondence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, (1996).
  36. Pajares, F., Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved May 11, 2010, from, (2002).
  37. Pajares, F., Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158, (2003). [CrossRef]
  38. Parker, J. C., Gender Differences in the Motivation to Learn. Evergreen: Evergreen State College, (2007).
  39. Pintrich, P., Understanding self-regulated learning. In Pintrich, P. (Ed.), Understanding Self-Regulated Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass., (1995).
  40. Pintrich, P. R., Motivational beliefs as resources for and constrains on conceptual change. In: Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S. & Carretero, M. (Eds). New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33–50). Oxford: Elsevier, (1999).
  41. Pintrich, P.R. & De Groot, E., Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), pp. 33–50, (1990). [CrossRef]
  42. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H., Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, (1995).
  43. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H., Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall, (1996).
  44. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H., Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Pearson education, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall, (2002).
  45. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W.J., A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning. Michigan: School of Education Building, The University of Michigan. ERIC database number: ED338122, (1991).
  46. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A., Do psychosocial and study factors predict college outcomes? Psychological Bulletin, 130 (2), 261–288, (2004). [CrossRef]
  47. Rusillo, M. T. ve Arias, P. F., Gender differences in academic motivation of secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2(1), 97–112, (2004).
  48. Schiefele, U., Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–324, (1991). [CrossRef]
  49. Schunk, D. H., Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26. 207–232, (1991). [CrossRef]
  50. Schunk, D. H., Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Upper Sadddle River, NJ: Pearson Merill Prentice Hall Inc., (2008).
  51. Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R., Influence of peer-model attributes on children’s beliefs and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 431–434, (1989). [CrossRef]
  52. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F., The Development of Academic Self-Efficacy. In Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. (Eds.), Development of Achievement Motivation. San Diego: American Press., (2001).
  53. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J., Self-regulation of learning and performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, (1994).
  54. Senay, A., The contribution of chemistry self-efficacy and goal orientations to eleventh grade students’ chemistry achievement. Ankara: Middle East Technical Univetsity, (2010).
  55. Shaughnessy, M. F., An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 153–176, (2004). [CrossRef]
  56. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S., Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Education Research, 95(6), 323–332, (2002). [CrossRef]
  57. Steinkamp, W.M. & Maehr, L.M., Affect, ability and science achievement. A quantative synthesis of correlational research. Review of Educational Research, 53 (3), 269–396, (1983). [CrossRef]
  58. Sungur, S.,The implementation of problem-based learning in secondary school biology courses. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, (2004).
  59. Sungur, S., Contribution of motivational beliefs and metacognition to students’ performance under consequential and nonconsequential test conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 127–142, (2007). [CrossRef]
  60. Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C., Student’s achievement in human circulatory system unit: The effect of resoning ability and gender. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12 (1), 59–64, (2003). [CrossRef]
  61. Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C., Effects of problem based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 307–317, (2006). [CrossRef]
  62. Tassone, A., The Explicit Use Of Performance Expectancy As A Function Of Self-Regulated Learning. Thunder Bay, Ontario: Lakehead University, (2001).
  63. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K., Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248, (1998). [CrossRef]
  64. Weinstein, C.E., & Mayer, R.E., The Teaching of Learning Strategies. In Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan, (1986).
  65. Wigfield, A., Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78, (1994). [CrossRef]
  66. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J., The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265–310, (1992). [CrossRef]
  67. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S., Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25,68–81, (2000). [CrossRef]
  68. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S., The development of competence beliefs, expectancies of success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, (2002). [CrossRef]
  69. Willingham, W.W. & Cole, N.S., Research on gender differences. In Willingham, W.W., & Cole, N.S. (Eds.) Gender and Fair Assessment .NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, (1997).
  70. Yenilmez, A., Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C., Students’ achievement in relation to reasoning ability, prior knowledge and gender. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24 (1), 129–138, (2006). [CrossRef]
  71. Yumusak, N., Predicting academic achievement with cognitive and motivational variables. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, (2006).
  72. Yumusak, N., Sungur, S. and Çakiroglu, J., Turkish high school students’ biology achievement in relation to academic self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 53–69, (2007). [CrossRef]
  73. Zimmerman, B.J., & Bandura, A., Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862, (1994). [CrossRef]
  74. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M., Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663–676, (1992). [CrossRef]
  75. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez Pons, M., Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59, (1990). [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.