Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 33, 2017
International Conference on Communication and Media: An International Communication Association Regional Conference (i-COME’16)
Article Number 00062
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 02 February 2017
  1. E. Addessi, F. Bellagamba, A. Delfino, F. De Petrillo, V. Focaroli, L. Macchitella, V. Maggiorelli, B. Pace, G. Pecora, S. Rossi, A. Sbaffi, M. I. Tasselli, F. Paglieri. Cognition, Volume 130, Issue 3, March 2014, Pages 428–441. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aminuddin Baki. “Cheramah 3 Siri Gerakan Obor” Radio Malaysia. (1964c) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ibarretxe-Antunano, B.I (1999). Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: A Cross Linguistic Study: PhD Thesis. University of Edinburgh, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Angouri, & M. A. Locher. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (2012) 1549–1553. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Myers, R.J, & Kessler, M S (1980). The Rhetorical Analysis of Business Speech: Unresolved Questions Journal of Business Communication, July 2010 47: pages 346–368 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Billett. Educational Research Review, Volume 12, June 2014, Pages 1–13. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Biria, A. Mohammadi. J Pragmatics 44 (2012) 1290–1302. (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Cirillo. Heinz Werner and Developmental Science Path in Psychology 2005, pp 109–119. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Dekker. Appl Ergonomics, Volume 34, Issue 3, May 2003, Pages 233–238. (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Gentle, & T. N. Maraseni. “Climate change, poverty and livelihoods: adaptation practices by rural mountain communities in Nepal.” (2012) [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Fancourt, A. Ockelford, A. Belai, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, Volume 36, February 2014, Pages 15–26. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. V. V. Gouveia, T. L. Milfont, & V. M. Guerra. “Functional theory of human values: Testing its content and structure hypotheses.” (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Harteis, J. Bauer, H. Gruber. International Journal of Educational Research, Volume 47, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 223–231. (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. M. Islam, S. Sallu, K. Hubacek, J. Paavola. Marine Policy, Volume 43, January 2014, Pages 208–216. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Kadri, S. Chaabane, C. Tahon. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Volume 42, March 2014, Pages 32–52. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Kitajima, K. A. Carol. Ecology (jstor) 70 (4): 1102–1114. (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Lakoff. Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Marra. “Disagreeing without being disagreeable: Negotiating workplace.” (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Oishi. “Austin’s Speech Act Theory and the Speech Situation.” Esercizi Filosofici 1, 2006, pp. 1–14. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  20. M. M. Rodriguez Marquez. “Patterns of Translation of Metaphor in Annual Reports” in American English and Mexican Spanish. PhD Thesis, University of Surrey, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Saini. New Scientist, Volume 204, Issue 2731, 21 October 2009, Pages 42–45. (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Santagata. Linguistics and Education, Volume 15, Issues 1–2, spring 2004, Pages 141–164. (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Scholnick, N. Massoud, A. Saunders. “Journal of Financial Stability, Volume 9, Issue 1, April 2013, Pages 26–37. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Studer, B. Danuser, H. Hildebrandt, M. Arial, P. Gomez. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Volume 70, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages 557–564. (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Suckall, E. Tompkins, L. Stringer. Applied Geography, Volume 46, January 2014, Pages 111–121. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. P. E. Tetlock, F. M. Vieider, S. V. Patil, A. M. Grant. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Tourangeau, R. J. Sternberg. Cognition, Volume 11, Issue 3, May 1982, Pages 203–244. (1982) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. L. W. I. Wairegi, P. J. A. van Asten, M. Tenywa, M. Bekunda. (Musa spp. AAA-EA). (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.