Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 37, 2017
ERPA International Congresses on Education 2017 (ERPA 2017)
Article Number 01041
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 14 August 2017
  1. Altıntaş A. Comparison of Goal Orientations, Motivational Climates and Perceived Physical Competences of Athletes in Terms of Gender and Level of Experience. Postgraduate Thesis, Ankara University. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  2. Büyüköztürk Ş. Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences. Ankara: PegemaYayıncılık. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  3. Carron A. V., Colman M. M., Wheeler J., ve Stevens D. Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24 (2), 168–188. (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carron A. V., Eys M., ve Bray S. Team Cohesion and Team Success in Sport. Journal Of Sports Sciences, 20 (2), 119–126. (2002). doi:10.1080/026404102317200828 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carron A.V., Widmeyer W. ve Brawley L. The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266. (1985). doi: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duda J. L. Relationship Between Task and Ego Orientation and the Perceived Purpose of Sport Among High School Athletes. Journal Of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11(3), 318–335. (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duda J. L., & White S. A. Goal Orientations and Beliefs About the Causes of Sport Success Among Elite Skiers. Sport Psychologist, 6 (4), 334–343. (1992). doi: 10.1123/tsp.6.4.334 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eys M., Evans M. B., Martin L. J., Ohlert J., Wolf S. A., Van Bussel M., ve Steins C. Cohesion And Performance For Female And Male Sport Teams. The Sport Psychologist, 29(2), 97–109. (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gammage K. L., Carron A. V., & Estabrooks P. A. Team cohesion and individual productivity: The influence of the norm for productivity and the identifiability of individual effort. Small Group Research, 32(1), 3–18. (2001). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haddera T. A. Assessing the Relationships between Competitive Trait Anxiety, Self-Efficacy and Task Cohesion in Male and Female University Team Sports. CLEAR International Journal Of Research In Management, Sciences & Technology, 5(10), 1–11. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanrahan S. veCerin E. Gender, level of participation, and type of sport: Differences in achievement goal orientation and attributional style. Journal Of Science And Medicine In Sport, 12(4), 508–512. (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2008.01.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Howell W. C., & Dipboye R. L. Essentials of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: The Dorsey Pr., c1896. (1986). [Google Scholar]
  13. Karasar N. Scientific Research Method: Theories, Principles, Techniques. (23rd Edition) Ankara: Nobel. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Kocaekşi S. Identification of Relation of Group Cohesiveness and Affecting Variables with Success in Successful and Unsuccessful Handball Teams. Postgraduate Thesis, HacettepeUniversity. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  15. Lameiras J., Almeida P. L. ve Garcia-Mas A. Relationships Between Cooperation And Goal Orientation Among Male Professional And Semi-Professıonal Team Athletes. Perceptual & Motor Skills: Motor Skills & Ergonomics, 119 (3), 851–860. (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li F., Harmer P., & Acock A. The Task And Ego Orientation İn Sport Questionnaire: Construct Equivalence And Mean Differences Across Gender. Research Quarterly For Exercise And Sport, 67(2), 228–238. (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Öcel H. Relations of Collective Competence-Self-Efficacy and Cohesiveness with Perception and Expectations of Success. Postgraduate Thesis, Hacettepe University. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  18. Sari İ., Ilic J. veLjubojevic M. The Comparison of Task and Ego Orientation and General Self-Esteem of Turkish and Montenegrın Young Basketball Players. Kinesiology: International Journal of Fundamental and Applied Kinesiology, 45 (2), 203-212. (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. Toros T. Reliabılity and Validity of “Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire -TEOSQ-” For Turkish Athletes. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 15 (3), 155–166. (2004). [Google Scholar]
  20. Toros T., Akyüz U., Bayansalduz M. ve Soyer F. Examining the relationship between task-and ego-oriented goals and life satisfaction (A study of people doing mountaineering sports). Journal of Human Sciences, 7 (2), 1039–1050. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  21. Üngür G. Relation between Goal Orientations and Perceived Motivational Climate of Amateur and Professional Football Players. Postgraduate Thesis, Ege University. (2009). [Google Scholar]
  22. White S. A. ve Duda J. L. The relationship of gender, level of sport involvement, and participation motivation to task and ego orientation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25 (1), 4–18. (1994). [Google Scholar]
  23. Zakaria J., Yasim M. M., & Taff M. M. The Impact of Adventure Based Activity at Malaysian National Service Training Programme on Team Cohesion: A Demographic Analysis. International Journal Of Sport Management, Recreation & Tourism, 10, 64–79. (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.