Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 38, 2017
Connaissances et Usages en L2 / Knowledge and Usage in L2
Article Number 00007
Number of page(s) 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173800007
Published online 01 December 2017
  1. Adringa, S., & Rebuschat P. (2015). New Directions in the Study of Implicit and Explicit Learning. An introduction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Special Issue 02, 185-196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J. (1990). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New-York:W.H.Freeman. [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, Eve, V., (1985). Acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In D.I.Slobin (Ed), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, (pp. 687-782), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  4. DeKeyser R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. De Graaff, R., & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 726-755). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis N.C. (2005). At the Interface: Dynamic Interactions of Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, Cue, Competition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking, and Perceptual Learning. Applied Linguistics 27(2). 164-194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellis N.C. (2008). Implicit and Explicit knowledge about language. In J. Cenoz and N. H. Hornberger (eds), Knowledge about Language Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd Edition, Volume 6: (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, N. C. (2012). What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use? In S. Th. Gries & D. S. Divjak (Eds.) Frequency effects in language learning and processing, Vol. 1 (pp‥ 7-34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Google Scholar]
  10. Gerolimich, S. (forthcoming). Reformulation et acquisition d’une langue étrangère : De la reformulation en langue maternelle à la reformulation en langue étrangère. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gülich, E. K. & Kotschi T. (1983). Les marqueurs de la reformulation paraphrastique. Les marqueurs de reformulation paraphrastique », Cahiers de linguistique française, 5, 305-351. [Google Scholar]
  12. Harris, Z. S. (1988). Language and Information, New York, Columbia University Press. Trad. fr. (2007) Amr. H. Ibrahim et C. Martinot, La langue et l’information, Paris, C. R. L. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hickmann, M. (1998). The Acquisition of French as a Native Language: Structural and Functional Determinants in a Crosslinguistic Perspective, Journal of speech language pathology and audiology, vol 21, 236-257. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kail, M. (1994). « Le développement du langage et les sciences cognitives », Psychologie Française, n° 39-1, 29-47. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ibrahim, A. H., & Martinot, C. (2003). Les reformulations lacunaires des enfants. In Martinot C. & Ibrahim A. (eds.), La reformulation, un principe universel d’acquisition, Paris : Kimé, 15-35 [Google Scholar]
  16. Littlemore, J. (2001). An empirical study of the relationship between cognitive style and the use of communication strategy. Applied Linguistics 22 (2), 241-265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Martinot, C. (1994). La reformulation dans les productions orales de définitions et d'explications, PhD, Université Paris VIII. [Google Scholar]
  18. Martinot, C. (1996). Reformulations chez de jeunes locuteurs : construction d'un discours à plusieurs voix. In Claquin F. et Mochet M.-A. (Eds.) Hétérogénéités en discours, Cahiers du français contemporain 3 (pp. 175-192), Paris : Didier-Erudition. [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinot, C. (2000a). Présentation acquisition et reformulation. Langages,140, 3-8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Martinot, C., (2000b). Étude comparative des processus de reformulation chez des enfants de 5 à 11 ans. Langages, 140, 92-123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martinot, C. (2009). Reformulations paraphrastiques et stades d’acquisition en français langue maternelle, Cahiers de praxématique 52, 29-57. [Google Scholar]
  22. Martinot, C., & Romero, C. (2009). La Reformulation: acquisition et diversité des discours, Cahiers de praxématique 52, 7-18. [Google Scholar]
  23. Martinot, C. (2015). La reformulation: de la construction du sens à la construction des apprentissages en langue et sur la langue. Corela, HS-18, placed online on 15th November 2015, consulted on 17th January 2017, online: https://corela.revues.org/pdf/4034 [Google Scholar]
  24. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Pp. 219. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tutunjiu, E. (2012). Acquisition des phénomènes linguistiques complexes en roumain langue maternelle (enfants de 6 à 10 ans). PhD, Université de Paris-Descartes. [Google Scholar]
  26. Westhoff, G.J. (1991). Increasing the effectiveness of foreign language reading instruction (Part 1). ADFL Bulletin 22 (2), 29-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.