Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 41, 2018
International Conference on Architectural Education in Asia (eduARCHsia 2017)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 11
Section Multitude of Cultural Complexity
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184104007
Published online 10 January 2018
  1. Akkar, Z.M. (2005a). Questioning the ‘publicness’ of public spaces in post-industrial cities. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 16, 75-91. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkar, Z.M. (2005b). The changing ‘publicness’ of contemporary public spaces: a case study of the Grey's Monument Area, Newcastle upon Tyne. Urban Design International, 10, 95-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern Language. Towns-Buildings-Construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aplin, G. (2002). Heritage, identification, conservation and management. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carmona, M., Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & O. Taner. (2003). Public Places, Urban Spaces, The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Childs, M.C. (2004). Squares: A Public Place Design Guide for Urbanists. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper-Marcus, C. & Francis, C. (1998). People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  9. Department for Culture of Yogyakarta Government. (2015). Yogyakarta City of Philosophy. Yogyakarta: Department for Culture. [Google Scholar]
  10. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2000). Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gehl, J. (1987). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington-Covelo-London: Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Handinoto. 2010. Arsitektur dan Kota-kota di Jawa pada Masa Kolonial. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. [Google Scholar]
  13. ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites). (2008). Québec Declaration on the Preservation of the Spirit of Place. Paris: ICOMOS. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/a ctivity-646-2.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  14. Koseoglu, E. & Onder, D.E. (2011). Subjective and objective dimensions of spatial legibility. Procedia Environment and Behavior Sciences, 30, 1191-1195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lynch, K. (1981). A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Madanipour, A. (1995). Dimensions of urban public space: the case of the Metro Centre, Gateshead. Urban Design Studies, 1, 45-56. [Google Scholar]
  18. Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and Private Spaces of the City. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  19. Németh, J. (2006). Conflict, exclusion, relocation: Skateboarding and public space. Journal of Urban Design, 11(3), 297-318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Newman, O. (1980). Community of interest. Society, 18(1), 52-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli. [Google Scholar]
  22. Project for Public Spaces. (2000). How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces. [Google Scholar]
  23. Saeidi, S. & Oktay, D. (2012). Diversity for Better Quality of Community Life: Evaluations in Famagusta Neighbourhoods. Procedia Environment and Behavior Sciences, 35, 495-504. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sandler, D. (2007). Place and process: Culture, urban planning, and social exclusion in Sao Paulo. Social Identities, 13, 471-493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Septirina SN, Takeo O, & Satoru K. 2016. Conservation of historical architecture in Malioboro street, Yogyakarta city, Indonesia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 225, 259-269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tavano Blessi, G., Grossi, E., Sacco, P.L., Pieretti, G., & Ferilli, G. (2016). The contribution of cultural participation to urban well-being. A comparative study in Bolzano/Bozen and Siracusa, Italy. Journal of Cities, 50, 216-226. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tavano Blessi, G., Tremblay, D.G., Sandri, M., & Pilati, T. (2012). New trajectories in urban regeneration processes: Cultural capital as source of human and social capital accumulation-Evidence from the case of Tohu in Montreal. Journal of Cities, 29(6), 397-407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tibbalds, F. (1992). Making People-Friendly Towns. London: Longman. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tweed, C. & Sutherland, M. (2007). Built cultural heritage and sustainable urban development. Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 62-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Umar, H. 2005. Riset Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: Gramedia, Pustaka Utama. [Google Scholar]
  31. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). (2005). Basic Texts of the 1972 World Heritage Convention. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/a ctivity-562-4.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  32. Unesco (United Nations Educational, Scientific, And Cultural Organization). (2005). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, 2 February. Retrieved from Paris: UNESCO. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide05-en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Melik, R., Van Aalst, I., & Van Weesep, J. (2007). Fear and fantasy in the public domain: the development of secured and themed urban space. Journal of Urban Design, 12(1), 25-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Whyte, I.B. (2003.) Modernism and the Spirit of the City. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  35. Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: University Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zakaria, K., Harun, N.Z., & Mansor M. (2015). Place Meaning of the Historic Square as Tourism Attraction and Community Leisure Space. Procedia Environment and Behavior Sciences, 202, 477-486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.