SHS Web Conf.
Volume 42, 2018Global Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning in Education (GC-TALE 2017)
|Number of page(s)||7|
|Published online||29 January 2018|
- Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2013). Index for inclusion (3rd ed). Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
- Buckley, C. (2005). Establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships between regular and special education teachers in middle school social studies inclusive classrooms. In Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 18. Cognition and learning in diverse settings, edited by Thomas E. Scruggs, & Margo Mastropieri (pp. 153-198). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. [CrossRef]
- Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Every child matters (Green Paper). London: DfES.
- European Commission (2009). Strategic framework for education and training. Brussels: European Commission. Electronic source available online at:
- http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc28_en.htm (accessed 28-01-2013).
- Ferguson, D. L. (2008). International trends in inclusive education: The continuing challenge to teach each one and everyone. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 109 – 120. [CrossRef]
- Forbes, F. (2007). Towards inclusion: an Australian perspective. Support for Learning. 22(2), 66-71. [CrossRef]
- Hertberg-Davis, H. (2009). Myth7: Differentiation in the Regular Classroom Is Equivalent to Gifted Programs and Is Sufficient: Classroom Teachers Have the Time, the Skill, and the Will to Differentiate Adequately. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53: 251-253. [CrossRef]
- Janney, R. E., & Snell, M. E. (2006). Modifying schoolwork in inclusive classrooms. Theory into practice, 45(3), 215-223. [CrossRef]
- Kern, L., Delaney, B., Clarke, S., Dunlap, G., & Childs, K. (2001). Improving the classroom behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders using individualized curricular modifications. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27, 615-631.
- King-Sears, M. E. (2008). Facts and fallacies: Differentiation and the general education curriculum for students with special educational needs. Support for Learning, 23(2), 55-62. [CrossRef]
- Kurth, J. A., & Keegan, L. (2014). Development and use of curricular adaptations for students receiving special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 191-201 [CrossRef]
- Lee, S., Wehmeyer, M. L., Soukup, J. H., & Palmer, S. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76 (2), 213-233. [CrossRef]
- Morningstar, M. E., Shogren, K. A., Lee, H, & Born, K. (2015). Preliminary lessons about supporting participation and learning in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(3), 192–210. [CrossRef]
- Nind, M. & Wearmouth, J. (2006). Including children with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms: implications for pedagogy from a systematic review. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6(3), 116-124. [CrossRef]
- Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Kimberly A. McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children 73(4), 392-416. [CrossRef]
- Slee, R. (2013). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895-907. [CrossRef]
- Slee, R. (2010). The irregular school. Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routhledge.
- Stangvik, G. (2010). Special education in society and culture: comparative and developmental perspectives. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(4), 349-358. [CrossRef]
- Strogilos, V., & Stefanidis, A. (2015). Contextual antecedents of co-teaching efficacy: Their influence on students with disabilities' learning progress, social participation and behaviour improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 218-229. [CrossRef]
- Strogilos, V., Tragoulia, E., Avramidis, E., Voulagka, A., & Papanikolaou, V. (2017). Understanding the development of differentiated instruction for students with and without disabilities in co-taught classrooms, Disability & Society. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687599.2017.1352488
- Strogilos, V., E. Tragoulia., & Kaila, M. (2015). Curriculum issues and benefits in supportive co-taught classes for students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 61(1), 32-40. [CrossRef]
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.).Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Differentiating instruction for academic diversity. In J. M. Cooper (ed.) Classroom teaching skills, pp.149-180. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special needs Education. Paris: UNESCO. Electronic source available online at: http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF (accessed 18-08- 2017).
- UNESCO.(2001). The open file of inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO.
- United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations.
- US Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disability Education Act. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
- Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211–217. [CrossRef]
- Wehmeyer, M. L. (2011). Access to general education curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabiltities. In J. M. Kauffman and D. P. Hallahan. (Eds.). Handbook of Special Education (pp. 544-556). London: Routledge.
- Wehmeyer, M. L., Lattin, D. L., Lapp-Rincker, G., & Agran, M. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 262-272. [CrossRef]
- Zigmond, N., & Kloo, A. (2011). General and special education are (and should be different). In J. M. Kauffman and D. P. Hallahan. (Eds.). Handbook of Special Education (pp. 544-556). London: Routledge.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.