EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 42 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 42 (2018) 00003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 42, 2018
Global Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning in Education (GC-TALE 2017)
Article Number 00003
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200003
Published online 29 January 2018
  1. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2013). Index for inclusion (3rd ed). Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. [Google Scholar]
  2. Buckley, C. (2005). Establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships between regular and special education teachers in middle school social studies inclusive classrooms. In Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 18. Cognition and learning in diverse settings, edited by Thomas E. Scruggs, & Margo Mastropieri (pp. 153-198). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). Every child matters (Green Paper). London: DfES. [Google Scholar]
  4. European Commission (2009). Strategic framework for education and training. Brussels: European Commission. Electronic source available online at: [Google Scholar]
  5. http://ec.europa.eu/education/lifelong-learning-policy/doc28_en.htm (accessed 28-01-2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferguson, D. L. (2008). International trends in inclusive education: The continuing challenge to teach each one and everyone. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 109 – 120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forbes, F. (2007). Towards inclusion: an Australian perspective. Support for Learning. 22(2), 66-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hertberg-Davis, H. (2009). Myth7: Differentiation in the Regular Classroom Is Equivalent to Gifted Programs and Is Sufficient: Classroom Teachers Have the Time, the Skill, and the Will to Differentiate Adequately. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53: 251-253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Janney, R. E., & Snell, M. E. (2006). Modifying schoolwork in inclusive classrooms. Theory into practice, 45(3), 215-223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kern, L., Delaney, B., Clarke, S., Dunlap, G., & Childs, K. (2001). Improving the classroom behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders using individualized curricular modifications. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27, 615-631. [Google Scholar]
  11. King-Sears, M. E. (2008). Facts and fallacies: Differentiation and the general education curriculum for students with special educational needs. Support for Learning, 23(2), 55-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kurth, J. A., & Keegan, L. (2014). Development and use of curricular adaptations for students receiving special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 48(3), 191-201 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee, S., Wehmeyer, M. L., Soukup, J. H., & Palmer, S. B. (2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76 (2), 213-233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Morningstar, M. E., Shogren, K. A., Lee, H, & Born, K. (2015). Preliminary lessons about supporting participation and learning in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(3), 192–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nind, M. & Wearmouth, J. (2006). Including children with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms: implications for pedagogy from a systematic review. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 6(3), 116-124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Kimberly A. McDuffie, K. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children 73(4), 392-416. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Slee, R. (2013). How do we make inclusive education happen when exclusion is a political predisposition? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 895-907. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Slee, R. (2010). The irregular school. Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. London: Routhledge. [Google Scholar]
  19. Stangvik, G. (2010). Special education in society and culture: comparative and developmental perspectives. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(4), 349-358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Strogilos, V., & Stefanidis, A. (2015). Contextual antecedents of co-teaching efficacy: Their influence on students with disabilities' learning progress, social participation and behaviour improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 218-229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Strogilos, V., Tragoulia, E., Avramidis, E., Voulagka, A., & Papanikolaou, V. (2017). Understanding the development of differentiated instruction for students with and without disabilities in co-taught classrooms, Disability & Society. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09687599.2017.1352488 [Google Scholar]
  22. Strogilos, V., E. Tragoulia., & Kaila, M. (2015). Curriculum issues and benefits in supportive co-taught classes for students with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 61(1), 32-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed ability classrooms (2nd ed.).Alexandria, VA: ASCD. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Differentiating instruction for academic diversity. In J. M. Cooper (ed.) Classroom teaching skills, pp.149-180. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar]
  25. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special needs Education. Paris: UNESCO. Electronic source available online at: http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF (accessed 18-08- 2017). [Google Scholar]
  26. UNESCO.(2001). The open file of inclusive education. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar]
  27. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  28. US Department of Education. (2004). Individuals with Disability Education Act. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44(3), 211–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wehmeyer, M. L. (2011). Access to general education curriculum for students with significant cognitive disabiltities. In J. M. Kauffman and D. P. Hallahan. (Eds.). Handbook of Special Education (pp. 544-556). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wehmeyer, M. L., Lattin, D. L., Lapp-Rincker, G., & Agran, M. (2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 262-272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zigmond, N., & Kloo, A. (2011). General and special education are (and should be different). In J. M. Kauffman and D. P. Hallahan. (Eds.). Handbook of Special Education (pp. 544-556). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.