Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 09003
Number of page(s) 16
Section Phonétique, phonologie et interfaces
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184609003
Published online 09 July 2018
  1. Audibert, N., Fougeron, C., Gendrot, C. & Adda-Decker, M. (2015). Duration-vs. style-dependent vowel variation : a multiparametric investigation. In 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS’15, 5-10. [Google Scholar]
  2. Audibert, N., Fougeron, C., Gendrot, C. & Adda-Decker, M. (2015). Duration-vs. style-dependent vowel variation : a multiparametric investigation. In 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ICPhS’15, 5-10. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boersma, P. (2006). Praat : doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/ [Google Scholar]
  6. Boersma, P. (2006). Praat : doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/ [Google Scholar]
  7. Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N. & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities : sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 80-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N. & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities : sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 80-97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Côté, M-H. (2012). Laurentian French (Quebec) : extra vowels, missing schwas and surprising liaison consonants. In R. Gess, C. Lyche & T. Meisenburg (éds), Phonological variation in French : llustrations from three continents. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 235-274. [Google Scholar]
  10. Côté, M-H. (2012). Laurentian French (Quebec) : extra vowels, missing schwas and surprising liaison consonants. In R. Gess, C. Lyche & T. Meisenburg (éds), Phonological variation in French : llustrations from three continents. Amsterdam : John Benjamins, 235-274. [Google Scholar]
  11. Côté, M-H. (2014). Le projet PFC et la géophonologie du français laurentien. In J. Durand, G. Kristoffersen & B. Laks, avec la collaboration de J. Peuvergne (éds), La phonologie du français : normes, périphéries, modélisation. Nanterre : Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest, 175-198. [Google Scholar]
  12. Côté, M-H. (2014). Le projet PFC et la géophonologie du français laurentien. In J. Durand, G. Kristoffersen & B. Laks, avec la collaboration de J. Peuvergne (éds), La phonologie du français : normes, périphéries, modélisation. Nanterre : Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest, 175-198. [Google Scholar]
  13. Durand, J., Laks, B. & Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain : usages, variétés et structure. In C. Pusch & W. Raible (éds), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik – Korpora und gesprochene Sprache / Romance corpus linguistics – Corpora and spoken language. Tübingen : Gunter Narr, 93-106. [Google Scholar]
  14. Durand, J., Laks, B. & Lyche, C. (2002). La phonologie du français contemporain : usages, variétés et structure. In C. Pusch & W. Raible (éds), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik – Korpora und gesprochene Sprache / Romance corpus linguistics – Corpora and spoken language. Tübingen : Gunter Narr, 93-106. [Google Scholar]
  15. Erickson, D. (2002). Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels. Phonetica, 59(2-3), 134-149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Erickson, D. (2002). Articulation of extreme formant patterns for emphasized vowels. Phonetica, 59(2-3), 134-149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eskenazi, M. (1993). Trends in speaking styles research. In Proceedings of Eurospeech-93, 501-509. [Google Scholar]
  18. Eskenazi, M. (1993). Trends in speaking styles research. In Proceedings of Eurospeech-93, 501-509. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferguson, S. H. & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech : acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1241-1255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferguson, S. H. & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech : acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 1241-1255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Flikeid, K. & Cichocki, W. (1987). Application of dialectometry to Nova Scotia Acadian French dialects : phonological distance. In Papers from the 11th Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. Université de Moncton, 59-74. [Google Scholar]
  22. Flikeid, K. & Cichocki, W. (1987). Application of dialectometry to Nova Scotia Acadian French dialects : phonological distance. In Papers from the 11th Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. Université de Moncton, 59-74. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fougeron, C., & Audibert, N. (2011). Testing various metrics for the description of vowel distortion in dysarthria. In Actes de ICPhS 2011, 687-690. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gahl, S. (2015). Lexical competition in vowel articulation revisited : vowel dispersion in the Easy/Hard database. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 96-116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harmegnies, B. & Poch-Olivé, D. (1992). A study of style-induced vowel variability : laboratory versus spontaneous speech in Spanish. Speech Communication, 11(4-5), 429-437. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Harmegnies, B. & Poch-Olivé, D. (1994). Formants frequencies variability in French vowels under the effect of various speaking styles. Journal de Physique IV 4.C5 (1994), C5-509-512. [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (éds), Spontaneous speech : data and analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium. Tokyo : The National International Institute for Japanese Language. [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphie : University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Labov, W. (2002). Driving forces in linguistic change. Présenté à la International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Seoul National University, Séoul, Corée du Sud. [Google Scholar]
  30. Léon, P (1993). Précis de phonostylistique. Paris : Armand Colin. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical society of America, 35(11), 1773-1781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation : a sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (éds), Speech production and speech modelling. Dordrecht : Springer, 403-439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Milne, P. (2014). The variable pronunciations of word-final consonant clusters in a force aligned corpus of spoken French. Thèse de doctorat, Université d’Ottawa. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nakamura, M., Koji, I. & Sadaoki. F. (2008). Differences between acoustic characteristics of spontaneous and read speech and their effects on speech recognition performance. Computer Speech & Language 22.2 (2008), 171-184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nguyen, N. & Adda-Decker, M. (2013). Méthodes et outils pour l’analyse phonétique des grands corpus oraux. Paris : Hermes Science Publications. [Google Scholar]
  37. Passy, P. (1917). Les sons du français. Paris : Firmin Didot. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rouas, J. L., Beppu, M. & Adda-Decker, M. (2010). Comparaison des propriétés acoustiques de la parole lue, préparée et conversationnelle en français. In Actes des Journées d’Étude sur la Parole 2010, JEP2010, 245-250. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rousselot, P. J. (1897-1901). Principes de phonétique expérimentale. Paris : H. Welter. [Google Scholar]
  40. Scarborough, R., Dmitrieva, O., Hall-Lew, L., Zhao, Y., & Brenier, J. (2007). An acoustic study of real and imagined foreigner-directed speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(5), 3044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Scarborough, R. & Zellou, G. (2013a). Clarity in communication : “clear” speech authenticity and lexical neighborhood density effects in speech production and perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(5), 3793-3807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Scarborough, R. (2013b). Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail : relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 491-508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tiffany, W. R. (1959). Nonrandom sources of variation in vowel quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 2, 305-317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Bergem, D. R. (1993). Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class. Speech Communication, 12(1), 1-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Van der Harst, S., Van de Velde, H. & Van Hout, R. (2014). Variation in Standard Dutch vowels : the impact of formant measurement methods on identifying the speaker’s regional origin. Language Variation and Change, 26(2), 247-272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Walker, D. C. (1984). The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa : University of Ottawa Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.