EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 51 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 51 (2018) 01012 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 51, 2018
6th International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference SOCIETY. HEALTH. WELFARE (Part II)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 9
Section Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185101012
Published online 07 November 2018
  1. M.A. Eisenberg, Mich. Law Rev., 560 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.T. von Mehren, Cornell Law Rev. 67, 631–639 (1982); H. Dubroff, St. John Law Rev. 80, 559–620 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. H.D. Laube, Cornell Law Rev. 34(3), 291–302 (1949); J.C. Verhelle, Loyola Univ. Chicago (1958) [Google Scholar]
  4. Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia. Decision in case A 412 021 209 [Google Scholar]
  5. K.E. Davies, New York Univ. Law Rev. 88, 89 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Legrand, Harvard Int. Law J. 47(2), 517 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Zorzetto. Eunomía. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 3, 62 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. D.44.7.51; I.4.6.pr [Google Scholar]
  9. W.W. Buckland, The Main Institutions of the Roman Private Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Berger, A Dictionary of Roman Encyclopedic Law, edited by Clark, 7th edn. (The Lawbook Exchange ltd, 2004), p. 346 [Google Scholar]
  11. W.M. Best, A Treatise of Presumption of Law and Fact, with the Theory and Rules of Presumptive of Circumstantial Proof in Criminal Cases (T. and J.W. Johnson, Philadelphia, 1845), p. 38 [Google Scholar]
  12. J.T. Abdy, Bryan Walker. The Commentaries of Gaius and rules of Ulpian, edited by Clark, 3rd edn. (The Lawbook Exchange ltd, 2005), p. 486 [Google Scholar]
  13. J.N. Frank, Syracuse Law Rev. 10, 9–25 (1949) [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Radbruch, Oxford J. Legal Stud. 26(1), 1–11 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.L. Roberts, Theories of Genetic the Ownership. The Pertie-Flom Centre for Health Law the Policy ... at the Harvard Law School // http://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/assets/publications/Roberts_ Genetic_ Ownership_ Draft.pdf (27. 06. 2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. Ibid, p. 175 [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Nedlesky, Laws relations: a rational theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law (Oxford University Press, New York, 2011), p. 255 [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Friedman, Touro Law Rev. 19(4), 617 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Cafaggi, A comparative analysis of transnational private regulation: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement. Report Comparative, http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/a–comparative–analysis–of–transnational–private–regulation–fcafaggi_ 12062014.pdf (15.06.2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Balodis, Likumsuntiesıbas. 9, 270–271 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  21. D.A. Lēbers, Tieslietu MinistrijasVēstnesis. 9, 222–223 (1933) [Google Scholar]
  22. German Civil Code. Section 443. Guarantee. (1) Where the seller, the producer or some other third party enters into obligation, in addition to his statutory liability for defects, by way of making a declaration or in relevant advertising that was available prior to the purchase agreement being concluded or at the ITS Conclusion of time, such being of the Obligation in Particular to reimburse the purchase price, to the Exchange Thing, to repair or to the provide IT services in the this context the Thing Should not the not exhibit the quality or not fulfil other requirements than those concerning its freedom from defects, in each case as described in the declaration or in the relevant advertisement (guarantee), the buyer shall be entitled, in the case of a guarantee having been given, and notwithstanding his statutory claims, to the rights under the guarantee in relation to the person who has given the guarantee (guarantor). (2) To the extent that the guarantor gives a guarantee as to the thing having a specified quality for a specified period (guarantee of durability), the presumption will be that a material defect which appears during the guarantee period triggers the rights under the guarantee. German Civil Code, Federal Law Gazette I p. 3719. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  23. W. Snijders, The Civil Codes of the Russian Federation and the Netherlands: Similarities and Contrasts, Private and Civil Law in the Russian Federation, edited by W. Simons (Martinus Nijh off Publishers, Leiden, 2009), p. 33 [Google Scholar]
  24. English Private Law, Failure of Gifts by Will or of Interests on Intestacy, edited by prof. Andrew Burrows, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 603 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ibid, p. 460 [Google Scholar]
  26. In this case: the interest of the testator to donate property [Google Scholar]
  27. Contemporary International Law Issues: Opportunities at a time of momentious Change. Proceeding of the Second Joint Conference held in the Hague, the Netherlands, July 22–24, 1993 – (Boston: MartinusNijhoff Publishers, 1994), p. 8 [Google Scholar]
  28. T.W. Merrill, H.E. Smith, Columbia Law Rev. 101, 774–799 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. F. De Vecchi, Edith Stein's Social Ontology of the State, the Law and Social Acts. An Eidetic Approach, Early Phenomenology, edited by D. Morgan and R.K.B. Parker, (Zeta Books, 2015), p. 312 [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Philippe, Begriffsbilding und Interessenjurisprudenz (Mohr, Tübingen, 1932), 228 S [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Bilz, J. Nadler, Law, Moral Attitudes, and Behavioral Change (The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law, 2014), pp. 241–269 [Google Scholar]
  32. T.F.T. Plucknett, Concise history of the common law, 5th edn. (Butterworths, London, 1956), p. 256 [Google Scholar]
  33. R.J. Allen, M. Ross, Chicago-Kent Law Review 77, 686 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  34. Restatement Second of Contracts, The American Law Institute, 1981. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  35. German Civil Code, BGBl. I S. 3719. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  36. The Swiss Civil Code, BBl 1904 IV 1, 1907 VI 367. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  37. Law of Succession Act (Estonia), RT I 2008, 7, 52. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  38. Civil Code of the Austria, JGS Nr. 946/1811. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  39. Civil Law, ValdıbasVēstnesis, 41, 20.02.1937. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  40. French Civil Code, Journal officiel de la République française, 21.05.2018. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  41. Sale of Goods Act 1979, 1979 Chapter 54. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  42. Sale of Goods Act 1893, 1893 Chapter 71. With amendments [Google Scholar]
  43. Family Law Act (Estonia), RT I 2009, 60, 395. With amendments [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.