EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 (2018) SHS Web Conf., 56 (2018) 04003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2018
International Conference on Leadership and Management (ICLM 2018)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Digital Economy & Preemptive Global Business Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185604003
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. Abdul Halim, H.,Ahmad, N. H.,Ramayah, T.,Hanifah, H., Taghizadeh, S. K., &Mohamad, M. N. (2015). Towards an Innovation Culture: Enhancing Innovative Performance of Malaysian SMEs. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(2). [Google Scholar]
  2. AlAzzawi, S. (2012). Innovation, productivity and foreign direct investment-induced R&D spillovers. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 21(5), 615-653. doi:10.1080/09638199.2010.513056 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Almeida, R., &Fernandes, A. M. (2008). Openness and technological innovations in developing countries: evidence from firm-level surveys. The Journal of Development Studies, 44(5), 701-727. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnold, C.,Kiel, D., & Voigt, K.-I. (2016). How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. International Journal of Innovation Management, 20(08), 1640015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashwin, A. S.,Krishnan, R. T., &George, R. (2015). Family firms in India: family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 869-900. doi:10.1007/s10490-015-9440-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., &Maksimovic, V. (2012). Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(06), 1545-1580. doi:10.1017/S0022109011000378 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baron, R. M., &Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chong, W. T. (2012). Critical success factors for small and medium enterprises: perceptions of entrepreneurs in urban Malaysia. Journal of Business and Policy Research, 7(4), 204-215. [Google Scholar]
  9. Coles, J. L.,Daniel, N. D., &Naveen, L. (2014). Co-opted Boards. Review of Financial Studies. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhu011 [Google Scholar]
  10. D’Angelo, A.,Majocchi, A., &Buck, T. (2016). External managers, family ownership and the scope of SME internationalization. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 534-547. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.01.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Essen, M. V.,Oosterhout, J. H. V., &Carney, M. (2012). Corporate Boards and the Performance of Asian Firms: A Meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 873-905. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Forsman, H., &Temel, S. (2011). INNOVATION AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE IN SMALL ENTERPRISES: AN ENTERPRISE-LEVEL ANALYSIS. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(03), 641-665. doi:10.1142/S1363919611003258 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gunday, G.,Ulusoy, G.,Kilic, K., &Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haji, A. A., &Mubaraq, S. (2015). The implications of the revised code of corporate governance on firm performance: A longitudinal examination of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5(3), 350-380. doi: doi:10.1108/JAEE-11-2012-0048 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henning, K. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. [Google Scholar]
  16. Heugens, P. P.,Essen, M. V., &Oosterhout, J. H. V. (2009). Meta-analyzing Ownership Concentration and Firm Performance in Asia: Towards more fine-grained Understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 481-512. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hilmi, M. F.,Ramayah, T.,Mustapha, Y., &Pawanchik, S. (2010). Product and process innovativeness: evidence from Malaysian SMEs. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), 556-564. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hogeforster, M. (2014). Future Challenges for Innovations in SMEs in the Baltic Sea Region. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 241-250. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.867 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hult, G. T. M.,Hurley, R. F., &Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429-438. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.015 [Google Scholar]
  20. INSEAD, Organization, W. I. P., & University, C. (2017). “Global Innovation Index 2017” Innovation Feeding the World. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keskin, H. (2006). Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: An extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(4), 396-417. doi:10.1108/14601060610707849 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lasi, H.,Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., &Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239-242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liao, Y.,Deschamps, F., Loures, E. d. F. R., &Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629. [Google Scholar]
  25. Masso, J.,Roolaht, T., &Varblane, U. (2013). Foreign direct investment and innovation in Estonia. Baltic Journal of Management, 8(2), 231-248. doi:10.1108/17465261311310036 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Model, N. E. (2010). The new economic model for Malaysia concluding Part 2. National Economic Advisory Council. [Google Scholar]
  27. National SME Development Council. (2012 - 2020). SME Masterplan, Catalysing growth and income. [Google Scholar]
  28. North, D., &Smallbone, D. (2000). The Innovativeness and Growth of Rural SMEs During the 1990s. Regional Studies, 34(2), 145-157. doi:10.1080/00343400050006069 [Google Scholar]
  29. OECD. (2005). Governance of Innovation Systems Synthesis report. 1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Otero‐Neira, C., Lindman, M. T., & Fernández, M. J. (2009). Innovation and performance in SME furniture industries: An international comparative case study. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(2), 216-232. doi:10.1108/02634500910944995 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Raoul, M.,Pierluigi, M., &Monica, P. (2012). Ownership Structure, Governance, and Innovation: Evidence from Italy. Government of the Italian Republic (Italy), Ministry of Economy and Finance, Department of the Treasury working paper, 10. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rjoub, H.,Aga, M., Abu Alrub, A., &Bein, M. (2017). Financial Reforms and Determinants of FDI: Evidence from Landlocked Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economies, 5(1), 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosenbusch, N.,Brinckmann, J., &Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R.-C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015). Industry 4.0-potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business Information Systems. [Google Scholar]
  35. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory Of Economic Development Harvard Uni. Press, Cambridge, MA. [Google Scholar]
  36. SME Corporation Malaysia. (2015). SME Annual Report 2014-15. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tan, K. S.,Chong, S. C.,Lin, B., &Eze, U. C. (2009). Internet‐based ICT adoption: evidence from Malaysian SMEs. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(2), 224-244. doi:doi:10.1108/02635570910930118 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tanganelli, D., & Schaan, J.-L. (2011). Ownership Strategy in SMEs’ International Joint Ventures. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 24(4), 551-566. doi:10.1080/08276331.2011.10593553 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Teixeira Latini, E., Rubens Fontes-Filho, J., & L. Chambers, E. (2014). Private equity and corporate governance: managing Brazilian SMEs. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 14(2), 220-237. doi:10.1108/CG-02-2013-0017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson, P., &Zang, W. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the SME sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 50-75. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-12-2013-0218 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ughetto, E. (2010). Assessing the contribution to innovation of private equity investors: A study on European buyouts. Research Policy, 39(1), 126-140. [Google Scholar]
  42. Umrani, A. I.,Johl, S. K., &Ibrahim, M. Y. (2015). Corporate Governance Practices and Problems Faced by SMEs in Malaysia. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 7(2). [Google Scholar]
  43. Umrani, A. I.,Johl, S. K., &Ibrahim, M. Y. (2017). Ownership Structure Attributes, Outside Board Members and SMEs Firm Performance with Mediating Effect of Innovation in Malaysia. Global Business and Management Research, 9(1s), 393. [Google Scholar]
  44. Westman, C., &Thorgren, S. (2016). Partner Conflicts in International Joint Ventures: A Minority Owner Perspective. Journal of International Management, 22(2), 168-185. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2015.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zahra, S. A. (2010). Organizational learning and entrepreneurship in family firms: exploring the moderating effect of ownership and cohesion. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 51-65. doi: 10.1007/s11187-010-9266-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.