Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 62, 2019
17th International Scientific Conference “Problems of Enterprise Development: Theory and Practice” 2018
Article Number 09003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Management of the Development of Foreign Economic Activities of Russian Organizations in the Unstable International Environment
Published online 15 March 2019
  1. S. Anand, S.M.R. Kanbur, The Kuznets process and the inequality-development relationship. Journal of Development Economics, (1), 25-52. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3878(93)90103-T(1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Friedman, The role of monetary policy. The American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_11 (1968). [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Bouvet, EMU and the dynamics of regional per capita income inequality in Europe. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), 323-344. DOI: 10.1007/s10888-010-9129-0 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N.W. Ismail, Growth and сonvergence in ASEAN: A dynamic panel approach, International Journal of Economics and Management, 2(1), 127-140. URL: (2008). [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Mookherjee, A.F. Shorrocks, A decomposition analysis of the trend in UK income inequality. Economic Journal, 92(368), 886-902. DOI: 10.2307/2232673 (1982). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K.P. Gluschenko, On estimation of inter-regional inequality. Spatial Economics, 4, 39-58. DOI: 10.14530/se.2015.4.039-058 (2015). [in Rus.]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M.Yu. Malkina, On the issue of weighting in interregional studies. Spatial Economics, 1, 163-184. DOI: 10.14530/se.2016.1.163-184058 (2016). [in Rus.]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M.N. Tolmachev, Theoretical and empirical approaches to convergence of agricultural production. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Global Economic System, 1(20), 193-199 (2012). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  9. V.A. Markov, Spatial heterogeneity in the development of regional labor markets: statistical methods and models. Saratov, Russia: SSEI of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (2015). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Allanson, Income stratification and between-group inequality. Economics Letters, 124(2), 227-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.05.025 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.R. Azzoni, Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil, The Annals of Regional Science, 35(1), 133-152. DOI: 10.1007/s001680000038 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Lerman, S. Yitzhaki, Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(1), 151-156. DOI: 10.2307/1928447 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. O.S. Balash, Convergence spatial analysis of Russia’s regions, Izv. Saratov Univ. (N.S.), Ser. Economics. Management. Law, 4(12), 45-52 (2012). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  14. A.V. Brovkova, Improving methods of statistical analysis of socio-economic inequality and regional convergence in Russia. Vestnik Saratov State Socio-Economic University, 2(51), 113-117 (2014). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Bayer, F. Juessen, Convergence in West German regional unemployment rates, German Economic Review, 8(4), 510-535. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2007.00416.x (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Fischer, C. Stirböck, Pan-European regional income growth and club-convergence insights from a spatial econometric perspective. Annals of Regional Science, 40(4), 693-721. DOI: 10.1007/s00168-005-0042-6 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.