Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 62, 2019
17th International Scientific Conference “Problems of Enterprise Development: Theory and Practice” 2018
Article Number 12002
Number of page(s) 5
Section Socialization Processes in the Context of Modern Telecommunication Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196212002
Published online 15 March 2019
  1. G. Feuser, Inklusion – ein leeres Versprechen? Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag (2017). [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Schnell, Herausforderung Inklusion: Theoriebildung und Praxis. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. B.A. Rajzberg, L.Sh. Lozovskij, E.B. Starodubceva, The Contemporary Economic Dictionary. Moscow: INFRA-M (1999). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Medcalfe, Economic well-being in U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Social Indicators Research, 139(3), 1147-1167. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-017-1755-5 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Beljaeva, Income inequality in Russian society: Social consequences and issues. Vestnik Instituta Sotziologii, 3(26), 83-100. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2018.26.3.526 (2018). [in Rus.]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. United Nations, Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf. Accessed: 06.02.2018 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  7. United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/. Accessed: 20.12.2018 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. M.L. Agranovich, Achievements indicators for sustainable development goals in education and national education policies. Educational Issues, 4, 242-264 (2017). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  9. United Nations, United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Reports. Retrieved from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/faq-page/human-development-index-hdi. Accessed: 06.02.2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. K.-E. Ackermann, Zum Umgang mit Widersprüchen in der sonderpädagogischen Diskussion um Inklusion. In M. Gercke, S. Opalinski, T. Thonagel (Eds.). Inklusive Bildung und gesellschaftliche Exklusion (pp.229-247). Heidelberg: Springer (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Carnoy, Ya.I. Kuzminov, Online-education: How it affects the university structure and economics. Yaroslav Kuzminov – Martin Carnoy panel discussion. Educational Policies, 3, 8-43. DOI: 10.17323/18149545-2015-3-8-43 (2015). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Аshwin, Can the university education change a person? The tasks of mapping the transformative power of higher education in comparative studies on the education quality (translated from English by N. Udarova). Educational Issues, 1, 21-34. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-1-21-34 (2016). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  13. N.N. Malofeev, Sponsors of schools for the deaf take a second breath. Defectology, 2, 52-62 (2004). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  14. N.N. Malofeev, Education for the blind in Russia of XIX century: Government and philanthropy. Defectology, 5, 74-82 (2004). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  15. E.N. Morgacheva, Foreign experience of inclusive education and the possibility of its use in native practice. Defectology, 3, 58-65 (2018). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Fasching, Career counseling at school for placement in sheltered workshops? British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 50-57 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Giesinger, Educational justice, segregated schooling and vocational education. Theory and Research in Education, 15(1), 88-102. DOI: 10.1177/1477878517696191 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Gebhardt, T. Tretter, S. Schwab, B. Gasteiger-Klicpera, The transition from school to the workplace for students with learning disabilities: Status quo and the efficiency of pre-vocational and vocational training schemes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 26(4), 443-459. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2011.597181 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Hoffmann, W. Jantzen, U. Stinkes, Empowerment und Exklusion: Zur Kritik der Mechanismen gesellschaftlicher Ausgrenzung. Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Simon, K. Clarke, Apprenticeships should work for women too! Education and Training, 58(6), 578-596. DOI: 10.1108/ET-02-2016-0022 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Belmonte, V. Suñé, The transition to working life plans. An inclusive training way for people with disabilities [Los planes de transicion al trabajo: Una opcion formative inclusive para personas con discapacidad]. Revista Espanola de Orientacion y Psicopedagogia, 25(2), 24-39 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Brown, K. Farrington, J. Suomi, M. Ziegler, Work-wage relationships and individuals with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 13(1), 5-13 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Tomlinson, Social justice and lower attainers in a global knowledge economy. Social Inclusion, 1(2), 102-112. DOI: 10.12924/si2013.01020102 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P.R. Egorov, Historical periods in the development of the ideas of educating people with sight disabilities. Science and Education, 2(58), 48-51 (2010). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu.P. Sheyn, L.P. Sheyna, Problems of inclusion and social success of people with disabilities. Vestnik UGUES., 3(13), 44-48 (2015). [in Rus.]. [Google Scholar]
  26. I. Hedderich, J. Hollenweger, G. Biewer, R. Markowetz, Handbuch Inklusion und Sonderpädagogik. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt (2016). [Google Scholar]
  27. U. Heimlich, Inklusive Pädagogik: Taschenbuch. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer W., GmbH (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.