EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 64 (2019) SHS Web Conf., 64 (2019) 03012 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 64, 2019
14th European Architecture Envisioning Conference (EAEA14 2019)
Article Number 03012
Number of page(s) 12
Section Design
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196403012
Published online 26 August 2019
  1. R. Post, “Are tiny houses and micro-apartments the future of urban homes? | Guardian Sustainable Business | The Guardian, ” 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Münzel, T. Gori, W. Babisch, and M. Basner, “Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise exposure., ” Eur. Heart J., vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 829–36, Apr. 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. N.-G. Vardaxis, D. Bard, and K. Persson Waye, “Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings—part I: Associations of acoustic field data to subjective responses from building surveys, ” Build. Acoust., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 151–170, Jun. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Rautio, S. Filatova, H. Lehtiniemi, and J. Miettunen, “ Living environment and its relationship to depressive mood: A systematic review, ” Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 92–103, Feb. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Furrer, Room and Building Acoustics and Noise Abatement. London: Butterworths, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Mershon, W. Ballenger, A. Little, P. McMurty, and J. Buchanan, “Effects of room reflectance and background noise on perceived auditory distance, ” Perception, vol. 18, pp. 403–416, 1989. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Cabrera and D. Gilfillan, “Auditory distance perception of speech in the presence of noise, ” in Proceedings of the2002 International Conference on Auditory Display, Kyoto, Japan, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Mommertz, Acoustics and sound insulation: principles, planning, examples. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Sheridan, N. York, and K. Van Lengen, ``Hearing Architecture Exploring and Designing the Aural Environment, ” ACSA, Inc, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Wang, Y. Si, H. Abdul-Rahman, and L. C. Wood, “Noise annoyance and loudness: Acoustic performance of residential buildings in tropics, ” Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 680–700, Nov. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Y. Jeon, J. K. Ryu, and P. J. Lee, “A quantification model of overall dissatisfaction with indoor noise environment in residential buildings, ” Appl. Acoust., vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 914–921, Oct. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Bluhm, E. Nordling, and N. Berglind, “Road traffic noise and annoyance–an increasing environmental health problem., ” Noise Health, vol. 6, no. 24, pp. 43–9, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson and E. Öhrström, ``Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas, ” Landsc. Urban Plan., vol. 83, no. 2-3, pp. 115–126, Nov. 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Mitchell, ``Speed and Road Traffic Noise The role that lower speeds could play in cutting noise from traffic A report commissioned by the UK Noise Association. Researched and written by Paige Mitchell, ” 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Hongisto, M. Mäkilä, and M. Suokas, “Satisfaction with sound insulation in residential dwellings − The effect of wall construction, ” Build. Environ., vol. 85, pp. 309–320, Feb. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Grimwood, “Complaints about poor sound insulation between dwellings in england and wales, ” Appl. Acoust., vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 211–223, Nov. 1997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C.-J. Yu and J. Kang, ``Soundscape in the sustainable living environment: A crosscultural comparison between the UK and Taiwan, ” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 482483, pp. 501–509, Jun. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. H. Park and P. J. Lee, “Effects of floor impact noise on psychophysiological responses, ” Build. Environ., vol. 116, pp. 173–181, May 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Maschke and H. Niemann, “Health effects of annoyance induced by neighbour noise, ” Noise Control Eng. J., vol. 55, no. 3, p. 348, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Namba, S. Kuwano, A. Schick, A. Aclar, and M. Florentine, “A cross-cultural study on noise problems: comparison of the results obtained in Japan, West Germany, The U.S.A., China and Turkey, ” J. Sound Vib., vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 471477, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Baruch, ``Response Rate in Academic Studies - A Comparative Analysis, ” Hum. Relations, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 421–438, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  22. H. N. Li, C. K. Chau, and S. K. Tang, “Can surrounding greenery reduce noise annoyance at home?, ” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 408, no. 20, pp. 4376–4384, Sep. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. “WHO night noise guidelines for Europe, ” Mar. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Guski, “Psychological determinants of train noise annoyance, ” Euro-Noise, vol. 98, no. 1, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Blunt, “Cultural geography: cultural geographies of home, ” Prog. Hum. Geogr., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 505–515, Aug. 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.