EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 75 (2020) SHS Web Conf., 75 (2020) 03010 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 75, 2020
The International Conference on History, Theory and Methodology of Learning (ICHTML 2020)
Article Number 03010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Discourses of Learning, Education and Training
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207503010
Published online 26 March 2020
  1. R. Hiemstra, Aspects of effective learning environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 50, 5–12. (1991). doi:10.1002/ace.36719915003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Mandl, G. Reinmann-Rothmeier, in International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, ed. by N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (Elsevier, 2001), pp. 4697–4701 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Spivakovsky, L. Petukhova, V.Kotkova, Yu. Yurchuk, Historical Approach to Modern Learning Environment. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2393 (2019), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol- 2393/paper_420.pdf Accessed 22 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Glazunova, M. Shyshkina, TheConcept, Principles of Design and Implementation of the University Cloud-based Learning and Research Environment. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104 (2018), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2104/paper_158.pdf Accessed 22 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  5. L.F. Panchenko, Information and educational environment of the modern university (“LNU named after Taras Shevchenko”, Luhansk, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  6. Analitychnyi zvit pro virtualnyi kruhlyi stil «Yak zdiisniuvaty upravlinnia seredovyshchem vzaiemodii usikh uchasnykiv osvitnoho protsesu?» (Virtual Roundtable Analytical Report “How to manage the interaction environment of all participants in the educational process?”) (2017), http://education-ua.org/ua/draft-regulations/966-analitichnij-zvit-pro-virtualnij-kruglij-stil-yakzdijsnyuvati-upravlinnya-seredovishchemvzaemodiji-usikh-uchasnikiv-osvitnogo-protsesu. Accessed 25 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  7. OECD, Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Executive summary (2009), https://www.oecd.org/berlin/43024880.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. M. Kalimullin, Z. I. Islamova, Formation of Information-Educational Environment in the Partner Universities of University of Shanghai Cooperation Organization. IEJME 11(6),1879–1890 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Potter, Powerful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions. Internet and Higher Education 7, 154–157 (2004). doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(04)00020-X [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Licite, L. Janmere, in Engineering for rural development, Jelgava, 23-25.05.2018, pp. 11981203. doi:10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N361 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Anderson, K. Day, Purposive environments: engaging students in the values and practices of history. IJHEEP 49(3),319–343 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. Standards of Professional Competencies Required of Teachers (2011), http://cfieleon.centros.educa.jcyl.es/sitio/upload/modelo_competencias_profesionales_profesorado%20_traducido.pdf.. Accessed 20 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  13. O. E. Hatlevik, K. A. Christophersen, Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. CE 63(1),240–247 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. A.E. Kiv, V.N. Soloviev, S.O. Semerikov, How cloud technologies continues to transform education. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2433, 119 (2019), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2433/paper00.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  15. Digitalisation strategy for the higher education sector 2017-2021 (2017), https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/779c0783 ffee461b88451b9ab71d5f51/en- gb/pdfs/digitaliseringsstrategi-for-uh-sektoren- engelsk-ve.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Howell, Teaching With ICT: Digital Pedagogies For Collaboration And Creativity (Oxford University Press, Melbourne, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Kivunja, Embedding Digital Pedagogy in PreService Higher Education To Better Prepare Teachers for the Digital Generation. IJSHE 2 (4),131–142 (2013). doi:10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p131 [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Stommel, Critical digital pedagogy: A definition. Hybrid Pedagogy (2014). http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/criti cal-digital-pedagogy-definition. Accessed 8 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Lund, T. E. Hauge, Designs for Teaching and Learning in Technology Rich Learning Environments. NJDL 4, 258–271 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Roth, Learning environments research, lifeworld analysis, and solidarity in practice. LER 2 (3),225247 (1999). doi: 10.1023/A: 1009953920993 [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Day, Creating and Sustaining Effective Learning Environments. AISHE-J 1(1),1–13 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Kuzminska, M. Mazorchuk, N. Morze, O. Kobylin, Attitude to the Digital Learning Environment in Ukrainian Universities. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2393 (2019), http://ceur- ws.org/Vol-2393/paper_245.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  23. O. Spirin, Yu. Nosenko, A. Iatsyshyn, Current requirements and contents of training of qualified scientists on information and communication technologies in education. Information technology and learning tools 56(6),219–239 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. O. Spirin, V. Oleksiuk, O. Oleksiuk, S. Sydorenko, The Group Methodology of Using Cloud Technologies in the Training of Future Computer Science Teachers. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2104 (2018),http://ceur-ws.org/Vol- 2104/paper_154.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019 [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Balyk, G. Shmyger, Y. Vasylenko, V. Oleksiuk, A. Skaskiv, in E-learning and STEM Education, ed. by E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (Studio NOA, Katowice, 2019), pp. 109–125 [Google Scholar]
  26. P. Legendre, in Encyclopedia of Research Design, vol. 1, ed. by N.J. Salkind (SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, 2010), pp. 164–169 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.