Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 09009
Number of page(s) 16
Section Phonétique, Phonologie et Interfaces
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207809009
Published online 04 September 2020
  1. Bouton, S., Serniclaes, W., Bertoncini, J., & Colé, P. (2012). Perception of speech features by Frenchspeaking children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55(1), 139-153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Giezen, M. R., Escudero, P., & Baker, A. (2010). Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53(6), 1440-1457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grandon, B. (2016). Développement typique et atypique de la production de parole: caractéristiques segmentales et intelligibilité de la parole d’enfants porteurs d’un implant cochléaire et d’enfants normo-entendants de 5 à 11 ans. (Doctoral dissertation). Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble. [Google Scholar]
  4. Horga, D., & Liker, M. (2006). Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 20(2-3), 211-217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & psychophysics, 50(2),93-107. [Google Scholar]
  6. Leybaert, J., Colin, C., Willems, P., Schepers, F., Renglet, T., Mansbach, A.-L., Simon, P., & Ligny, C. (2007). Implant cochléaire, plasticité cérébrale et développement du langage. In J. Lopez- Crahe (Ed.), Surdité et langage: prothèses, LPC et implants cochléaires, 13-67. [Google Scholar]
  7. Medina, V., & Serniclaes, W. (2009). Development of voicing categorization in deaf children with cochlear implant. In Tenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 152-155. [Google Scholar]
  8. Peng, Z. E., Hess, C., Saffran, J. R., Edwards, J. R., & Litovsky, R. Y. (2019). Assessing FineGrained Speech Discrimination in Young Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Otology & Neurotology, 40(3), e191-e197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pisoni, D. B., Cleary, M., Geers, A. E., & Tobey, E. A. (1999). Individual differences in effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who are prelingually deaf: New process measures of performance. The Volta Review, 101(3), 111. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pisoni, D. B., & Remez, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). The handbook of speech perception (p. 708). Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  11. Truy, E., & Lina, G. (2003). Cochlear implantation in children. Archives de pediatrie: organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie, 10(6), 554. [Google Scholar]
  12. Uchanski, R. M., & Geers, A. E. (2003). Acoustic characteristics of the speech of young cochlear implant users: A comparison with normal-hearing age-mates. Ear and hearing, 24(1), 90S-105S. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Den Abbeele, T. (2003). Implantation cochléaire chez l‘enfant. Médecine thérapeutique/Pédiatrie 6(5), pp. 320-327. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.