Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 11001
Number of page(s) 15
Section Ressources et outils pour l'analyse linguistique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207811001
Published online 04 September 2020
  1. Abramova, E. (2018). The role of pantomime in gestural language evolution, its cognitive bases and an alternative. Journal of Language Evolution, 3(1), 26–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bébian R.-A.-A. (1826). Mimographie, ou Essai d’écriture mimique propre à régulariser le langage des sourds-muets. Paris: L. Colas http://archive.org/details/BebianBallyMimographieLangageSourdsMuets1826 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bellugi, U. & Klima, E. S. (1979). The signs of language. Psychological Science, 1, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  4. Benesh, R. & Benesh, J. (1956). An introduction to Benesh Dance Notation. London: A. &C. Black. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bianchini, C. S. (2012). Analyse métalinguistique de l’émergence d’un système d’écriture des Langues des Signes: SignWriting et son application à la Langue des Signes Italienne (LIS). Univ. Paris 8 (C. Cuxac & D. Boutet) et Univ. Studi Perugia (M. Castelli, E. Antinoro Pizzuto): Paris. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bianchini, C. S., Chèvrefils, L., Thomas, C., Danet, C., Doan, P., Rébulard, M., Contesse, A. & Boutet, D. (2018). Guide d’annotation pour les polices de caractère Typannot dans le cadre du projet Typannot-Graphé. [rapport de recherche]. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal–01965272 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonnal-Vergès, F. (2005). Sémiogenèse de la langue des signes française: étude critique des signes de la langue des signes française attestés sur support papier depuis le XVIIIe siècle et nouvelles perspectives de dictionnaires. Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, Toulouse. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boutet, D. & Blondel, M. (2016). Les corpus de Langue des Signes Française. in: La Langue des Signes Française (LSF), modélisations, ressources et applications. London: ISTE Editions, 47–85. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs–01422734 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boutet, D. & Garcia, B. (2007). Structuration morpho-phonétique de la Langue des Signes Française (LSF). Etude à partir d’une base de données. Atelier Traitement Automatique des Langues des Signes (TALS), TALN2007. http://www.irit.fr/tals07/CP/Articles/Boutet.pdf.hal–00609047 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boutet, D., Sallandre, M.-A. & Fusellier-Souza, I. (2010). Gestualité humaine et langues des signes: entre continuum et variations. Langage et société, 131(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.131.0055 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge MS: The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1993). “Uphill” and “downhill” in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3(1), 46–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chételat-Pelé, E. (2010). Les gestes non manuels en Langue des Signes Française, annotation, analyse et formalisation: application aux mouvements des sourcils et aux clignements des yeux (Université de Provence - Aix-Marseille I). http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel–00547777 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chevrefils, L. (à paraître). Relations entre les paramètres de l’emplacement et du mouvement en Langue des Signes Française. (titre prov.). Univ. Rouen Normandie (D. Boutet & B. Guignard): Rouen. [Google Scholar]
  15. Darwin, C. (1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dokic, J. & Pacherie, E. (2006). On the very idea of frame of reference. in: Spaces in languages (M. Hickmann & S. Robert, eds), Typological Studies in Language, 66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 259–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Eccarius, P. & Brentari, D. (2008). Handshape coding made easier: a theoretically based notation for phonological transcription. Sign Language & Linguistics, 11(1), 69–101. [Google Scholar]
  18. Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague: Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  19. Emmorey, K. (2003). The neural systems underlying sign language. in: Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 361–376. [Google Scholar]
  20. Emmorey, K., McCullough, S., Mehta, S., Ponto, L. L. & Grabowski, T. J. (2011). Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(7), 878–901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Feuillet, R. A. (1701). Chorégraphie ou l’art de décrire la dance, par caractères, figures et signes démonstratifs. Paris: Michel Brunet. [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldin-Meadow, S. & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign and language: the coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, e46, 82 p.doi:10.1017/S0140525X15001247 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall, F. (1967). Benesh notation and ethnochoreology. Ethnomusicology, 11(2), 188–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, R. E. & Liddell, S. K. (2010). Toward a phonetic representation of signs: sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies, 11(2), 241–274. doi.org/10.1353/sls.2010.0008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kühnl-Kinel, A. (1999). Marcel Marceau: contribution à l’étude de l’art du mime. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lecoq, J., Carasso, J.-G. & Lallias, J.-C. (1997). Le corps poétique: un enseignement de la création théâtrale. Arles: Actes Sud. [Google Scholar]
  27. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. in: Language, speech, and communication: language and space (P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett eds). Cambridge MS: The MIT Press, 109–169. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. McMonnies, C. W. (1999). Chart construction and letter legibility/readability. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 19(6), 498–506. doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00460.x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Napier, J. R. (1956). The prehensile movements of the human hand. Journal ofBone and Joint Surgery, 38(4), 902–913. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S., Kita, S. & Senft, G. (1998). Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language, 74(3), 557–589. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pezin, P. [éditeur] (2003). Étienne Decroux, mime corporel: Textes, études et témoignages. Saint-Jean de Védas: L’Entretemps Editions. [Google Scholar]
  35. Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T. & Henning, J. (1989). Hamburg notation system for sign languages: an introductory guide. Hamburg: Signum Press. [Google Scholar]
  36. Radutzky E. (2001). Dizionario elementare della Lingua dei Segni Italiana. Roma: Ed. Kappa. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Walter de Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sandler, W. (2013). Vive la différence: sign language and spoken language in language evolution. Language and Cognition, 5(2-3), 189–203. doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schembri, A., Jones, C. & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3),272–290.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Singleton, J. L., Goldin-Meadow, S. & McNeill, D. (1995). The cataclysmic break between gesticulation and sign: evidence against a unified continuum of gestural communication. in: Language, gesture, and space (K. Emmorey & J. Reilly eds). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 287–311. [Google Scholar]
  41. Slobin, D. I., Hoiting, N., Anthony, M., Biederman, Y., Kuntze, M., Lindert, R., Pyers, J., Thumann, H. & Weinberg, A. (2001). Sign language transcription at the level of meaning components: the Berkeley Transcription System (BTS). Sign Language & Linguistics, 4(1-2), 63–104. doi.org/10.1075/sll.4.12.07slo [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sloetjes, H. & Wittenburg, P. (2008). Annotation by category: ELAN and ISO DCR. Proceedings 6th International Conference on Languace Resources Evaluation (LREC 2008), 816–820. [Google Scholar]
  43. Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(1), 3–37doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001 . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stokoe, W. C. (1976). A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Silver Spring MD: Linstok Press. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sutton, V. (1972). Sutton Movement Writing. La Jolla CA: Center for Sutton Movement Writing. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sutton, V. (1995). Lessons in SignWriting. La Jolla CA: Deaf Action Committee for SignWriting. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tabourot, J. (1588). Orchesographie et traicté en forme de dialogue, par lequel toutes personnes peuvent facilement apprendre & practiquer l’honneste exercice des dances. Lengres: Ichan des Preyz Imprimeur. [Google Scholar]
  48. Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. in: Spatial orientation: theory, research and application (H. Pick ed.). New York NY: Springer, 225–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thomas, C. (à paraître). Le rôle des articulateurs non-manuels en langues des signes française (titre prov.). Univ. Rouen Normandie (D. Boutet): Rouen. [Google Scholar]
  50. van der Hulst, H. & Channon, R. (2010). Notation systems. in: Sign Languages (D. Brentari ed.). Cambridge University Press, 151–172. http://homepage.uconn.edu/~hdv02001/Articles-pdfs/131%20-%20Notation%20Systems.pdf [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. von Laban, R. & Lange, R. (1975). Laban ’s principles of dance and movement notation. Boston MS: Princeton Book Co Pub. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.