Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 11004
Number of page(s) 18
Section Ressources et outils pour l'analyse linguistique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207811004
Published online 04 September 2020
  1. Abeillé, A. et Barrier, N. (2004). Enriching a French treebank. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04), Lisbon, Portugal. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abeillé, A., Clément, L., et Toussenel, F. (2003). Building a treebank for french. Treebanks. Text, Speech and Language Technology, 20, pp. 165–187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abeillé, A. et Crabbé, B. (2013). Vers un treebank du français parlé. In 20ème conférence du Traitement Automatique du Langage Naturel (TALN’13), Sables d’Olonne, France. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bach, E. W. (1981). Time, Tense, and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics In. Radical Pragmatics, pp. 63–81. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baude, O. et Dugua, C. (2011). (Re)faire le corpus d’Orléans quarante ans après: quoi de neuf, linguiste ?, Corpus, 10, pp. 99–118. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bejcek, E. et Strañák, P. (2010). Annotation of Multiword Expressions in the Prague Dependency Treebank. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), 44(1–2), pp. 7–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., Conrad, S. et Reppen R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bittar, A., Amsili, P., Denis, P., et Danlos, L. (2011). French TimeBank: an ISO-TimeML Annotated Reference Corpus. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies: Short Papers (ACL’2011), pp. 130–134, Portland, USA. [Google Scholar]
  9. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1987). Syntaxe, choix de lexique, et lieux de bafouillage. DRLAV. Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande Vincennes, 36(1), pp. 123–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1990). Le français parlé: études grammaticales. CNRS Edition, pp. 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In: D. Tannen (ed.), Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 3553. [Google Scholar]
  12. Crabbé, B. et Candito, M. (2008). Expériences d’analyse syntaxique statistique du français. Actes de la 15ème conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles - TALN’08, pp. 4454, Avignon, France. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dewaele, J. M. (2001). Une distinction mesurable: corpus oraux et écrits sur le continuum de la deixis. Journal of French Language Studies, 11(2), pp. 179–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eshkol-Taravella, I., Baude, O., Maurel, D., Hriba, L., Dugua, C., et Tellier, I. (2011). Un grand corpus oral “disponible”: le corpus d’Orléans 1 1968–2012. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 53(2), pp. 17–46. [Google Scholar]
  15. Green, S., de Marneffe, M.-C., Bauer, J., et Manning, C. D. (2011). Multiword expression identification with tree substitution grammars: A parsing tour de force with French. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP ’11), pp. 725–735, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Heeman, P.A., Allen, J.F. (1999). Speech repairs, intentional phrases and discourse markers: modeling speaker’s utterances in spoken dialogue. Computational Linguistics, 25(4), pp. 527572. [Google Scholar]
  18. ISO. (2012). Language Resource Management - Semantic Annotation Framework (SemAF) - Part 1: Time and Events. ISO 24617–1:2012. International Organization for Standardization. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kahane, S., Pietrandrea, P., et Gerdes, K. (2019). The annotation of pile structures. A. Lacheret- Dujour, et al. (ed), Rhapsodie: A prosodic and syntactic treebank for spoken French, pp. 65–95. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lacheret, A., Kahane, S., Beliâo, J., Dister, A., Gerdes, K., Goldman, J.-P., Obin, N., Pietrandrea, P., et Tchobanov, A. (2014). Rhapsodie: a Prosodic-Syntactic Treebank for Spoken French. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 295–301, Reykjavik, Iceland. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lefeuvre-Halftermeyer, A., Antoine, J.-Y., Couillault, A., Schang, E., Abouda, L., Savary, A., Maurel, D., Eshkol-Taravella, I., et Battistelli, D. (2016). Covering various Needs in Temporal Annotation: a Proposal of Extension of ISO TimeML that Preserves Upward Compatibility. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2016), Portoroz, Slovenia. [Google Scholar]
  22. Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), pp. 41–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mazzie, C. A. (1987). An experimental investigation of the determinants of implicitness in spoken and written discourse. Discourse Processes, 10, pp. 31–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Moscovici, S. et Humbert, C. (1960). Etudes sur le comportement verbal. Langage oral et langage écrit. Psychologie française, 3, pp. 175–183. [Google Scholar]
  25. Müller, B. (1985). Le Français d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Klincksieck. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nicolas, P., Letellier-Zarshenas, S., Schadle, I., Antoine, J.-Y., et Caelen, J. (2002). Towards a large corpus of spoken dialogue in French that will be freely available: the ’’Parole Publique” project and its first realisations. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2002), Las Palmas, Canary Islands. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language, 58, pp. 121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Cranenburgh, A., Scha, R., et Bod, R. (2016). Data-oriented parsing with discontinuous constituents and function tags. Journal of Language Modelling, 4(1), pp. 57–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Waszczuk, J., Wang, I., Antoine, J.-Y., et Halftermeyer, A. (2020). Contemplata, a Free Platform for Constituency Treebank Annotation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2020), Marseille, France. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zinsmeister, H. et Dipper, S. (2010). Towards a Standard for Annotating Abstract Anaphora. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2010), pp. 54–59, Valletta, Malta. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.