Open Access
Issue |
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02050 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
Section | Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219202050 | |
Published online | 13 January 2021 |
- Hronik, F. (2007). Rozvoj a vzdělávání pracovníků. Praha: Grada Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Bencsik, A., Machova, R. (2012). Knowledge management and ethics from the business point of view. In The 6th International Days of Statistics and Economics: Conference Proceedings. Prague: University of Economics. 124-136. [Google Scholar]
- Mingers J. (2015). Management Knowledge and Knowledge Management: Realism and Forms of Truth. In: Essentials of Knowledge Management. Palgrave Macmillan : London. [Google Scholar]
- Veber, J. (2016). Management inovací. 1. vyd. Praha: Management Press. [Google Scholar]
- Foss, N.J., Pedersen, T. (2019). Microfoundations in international management research: The case of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8), 1594–1621. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hewitt, B., Walz, D., McLeod, A. (2020). The Effect of Conflict and Knowledge Sharing on the Information Technology Project Team Performance. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 1-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Agrawal, A., Mukti, S.A. (2020). Knowledge Management & It's Origin, Success Factors, Planning, Tools, Applications, Barriers and Enablers: A Review. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 43-82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bencsik, R., Machova R., Toth, Z. (2016). Cheap and clever – symbiosis of frugal innovation and knowledge management. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(1), 85-93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Velinov, E., Kubicek, A. (2013). The role of top Managment Teams Heterogenity in the IPO Process. In 9th European Conference on Management Leadership and Governance. Klagenfurt, 325 – 331. [Google Scholar]
- Srisamran, P., Ractham, V.V., (2020). Impact of Knowledge Adoption and Cognitive Learning in the Knowledge Transfer Process. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(3), 1-16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J., Jiang, H., Wu, R., & Li, J. (2019). Reconciling the Dilemma of Knowledge Sharing: A Network Pluralism Framework of Firms’ R&D Alliance Network and Innovation Performance. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2635–2665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hronik, F. (2007). Rozvoj a vzdelavani pracovniku. Praha: Grada Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Dunn, M. B. (2019). Early Career Developmental Networks and Professionals’ Knowledge Creation. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1343–1371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sandvik, J., Saouma, R. Seegert N., & Stanton, Ch. (2020). Workplace Knowledge Flows, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(3), 1635–1680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Novák, A. (2017) Inovace je rozhodnutí. Praha: Grada Publishing, a.s. [Google Scholar]
- Bures, V., Brunet-Thorton, R. (2014). Confronting cultural barriers to knowledge management using a distinctive czech cultural model. In The 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics: Conference Proceedings, 229-240. [Google Scholar]
- Shenkar, O., Tallman, S.B., Wang, H. (2020). National culture and international business: A path forward. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(8), 1-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stoermer, S., Davies, S. & Froese, F.J. (2020). The influence of expatriate cultural intelligence on organizational embeddedness and knowledge sharing: The moderating effects of host country context. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(7), 1-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Todorova, N., Mills, A. M., (2018). Why do People Share?: A Study of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation to Share Knowledge in Organisations. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 1-20. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.