EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 92 (2021) SHS Web of Conf., 92 (2021) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 11
Section Collaborative Economics, Digital Platforms and Multimedia
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219205005
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Antras, P., De Gortari, A. Itskhoki, O. (2017). Globalization, inequality and welfare. Journal of International Economics, 108, 387-412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boztepe, A. (2016). Green Marketing and Its Impact on Consumer Buying Behavior. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 5, 5-21. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kusá, A., Piatrov, I. (2020). Perception of global environmental problems by Generation C and its marketing communication preferences. In T. Kliestik (eds.). Proceedings of the 19th internation scientific conference Globalization and its soio-economic consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the global-knowledge economy. SHS Web Conference, Cedex: EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jánošová, D., Labudová, L. (2020). The impact of globalization on regional marketing. In T. Kliestik (eds.). Proceedings of the 19th internation scientific conference Globalization and its soio-economic consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the global-knowledge economy. SHS Web Conference, Cedex: EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rybanský, R., Jánoš, D. (2020). Globalization and its impact on healthy lifestyle. In T. Kliestik (eds.). Proceedings of the 19th internation scientific conference Globalization and its soio-economic consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the global-knowledge economy. SHS Web Conference, Cedex: EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  6. Broner, F., Ventura, J. (2016). Rethinking the Effects of Financial Globalization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1497-1542. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Šikula. M. (2005). On the methodological basis of understanding the phenomenon of globalization. Journal of Economics, 53(7), 663 – 679. [Google Scholar]
  8. Radosinska, J., Visnovsky, J. (2016). Transformations of Public Sphere in the Era of DigitalMedia. European Journal of Science and Theology, 12, 85-96. [Google Scholar]
  9. Powell, J. C. (1996). The evaluation of waste management options. Waste Management & Research, 14(6), 515-526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bovea, M. D., Powell, J. C. (2006). Alternative scenarios to meet the demands of sustainable waste management. Journal Of Environmental Management, 79(2), 115-132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Emery, A., Davies, A., Griffiths, A., Williams, K. (2007). Environmental and economic modelling: A case study of municipal solid waste management scenarios in Wales. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 49(3), 244-263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Connolly, J., Prothero, A. (2008). Green Consumption Life-politics, risk and contradictions. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(1), 117-145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Romano, G., Rapposelli, A., Marrucci, L. (2019). Improving waste production and recycling through zero-waste strategy and privatization: An empirical investigation. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 146, 146-256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Achimská, V. (2020). Start-ups, bearers of innovation in globalizing environment and their valuation. In T. Kliestik (eds.). Proceedings of the 19th internation scientific conference Globalization and its soio-economic consequences 2019 – Sustainability in the global-knowledge economy. SHS Web Conference, Cedex: EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kitta, J. et al. (2017). Marketing. Bratislava: Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rizos,V., Tuokko, K., Behrens, A. (2017). The Circular Economy: A review of definitions, processes and impacts. Retrieved from: https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2017/2809-circulareconomy_review-of-definitions-processes-and-impacts_final_0.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. Szalai, P. (2019, August 27) Nové spaľovne: Pôvodcovia odpadu súhlasia, ochranári sú proti. Retrieved from: https://euractiv.sk/section/obehova-ekonomika/news/nove-spalovne-povodcovia-odpadu-suhlasia-ochranari-su-proti/ [Google Scholar]
  18. Profil Ewia. Retrieved from: https://www.ewia.sk/o-spolocnosti/ [Google Scholar]
  19. Slovo Šaľanov (2020). The Finnish circular model is coming to Šala. Slovo Šaľanov, 24(4), 20. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zariadenia vo svete. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ewia.sk/energeticke-vyuzitie-odpadu/zariadenia-vo-svete/ [Google Scholar]
  21. Zevo v zahraničí? Skvosty, ktoré ehromujú turistov. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.ewia.sk/zevo-v-zahranici-skvosty-ktore-ohuruju-turistov/ [Google Scholar]
  22. Potocar, R. (2020, May 11). Skládky prekážajú väčšine obyvateľov okresov Trnava a Šaľa, z odpadu chcú teplo a elektrinu. Retrieved from: https://www.odpady-portal.sk/Dokument/105312/skladky-prekazaju-vacsine-obyvatelov-okresov-trnava-a-sala-z-odpadu-chcu-teplo-a-elektrinu.aspx [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.