Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 92, 2021
The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020
Article Number 07004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Regions and Economic Resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219207004
Published online 13 January 2021
  1. Botlík, J. (2020). Movement of autonomous systems after selected infrastructure as a globalization effect induced by initiate Industry 4.0., In T. Kliestik (Ed.), Proceedings of 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences (295-306). Rajecké Teplice, Slovakia. [Google Scholar]
  2. Majdúchová, H., Barteková, M. K. (2020). Innovations in the Creative Industry Entities, In T. Kliestik (Ed.), Proceedings of 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences (295-306). Rajecké Teplice, Slovakia. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gavazzoni, F., Santacreu, A. M. (2020). International R&D spillovers and asset prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 136(2), 330-354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peter, V., Ravet, J., Roman, L., Enzing C., Venjakob, M., Adisorn, T., Seibt, C., Dates, M. (2017). Assessing the Impacts of EU Regulatory Barriers on Innovation. European Commission report, 59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Juris, R., Cugova A. (2020). Innovative environment in the country and its importance in terms of business innovation as a precondition for the financial performance of company. In T. Kliestik (Ed.), Proceedings of 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences (356-361). Rajecké Teplice, Slovakia. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ewens, M., Nanda, R., Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2018). Cost of experimentation and the evolution of venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 128(3), 422-442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoenig. B. (2018). Structures, mechanisms and consequences of Europeanization in research: how European funding affects universities. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 31(4), 504-522. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Czarnitzki, D., Bento, C. L. (2014). Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 380-409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Petelski, N., Milesi, D., Verre, V. (2020). Public support to innovation: impact on technological efforts in Argentine manufacturing firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(1), 66-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Azoulay, P., Graff Zivin, J. S., Li, D., Sampat, B. N. (2019). Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 117–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Xu, J., Wang, X., Liu, F. (2020). Government subsidies, R&D investment and innovation performance: analysis from pharmaceutical sector in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10.1080/09537325.2020.1830055. [Google Scholar]
  12. Berrutti, F., Bianchi, C. (2020). Effects of public funding on firm innovation: transforming or reinforcing a weak innovation pattern? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(5), 522-539. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bran, F., Bodislav, D.-A., Antoneta Mitriță, M.A. (2020). The Age of Automatization and the Evolution of Globalization. In T. Kliestik (Ed.), Proceedings of 19th International Scientific Conference Globalization and Its Socio-Economic Consequences (307-314). Rajecké Teplice, Slovakia. [Google Scholar]
  14. The Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP (2017, July). Interim Evaluation of Horizon 2020’s Financial Instruments. European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Retrieved from : https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/interim_evaluation_of_horizon_2020’s_financial_instruments.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2020). Science, technology and innovation. Data by theme. Retrieved from : http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SCN_DS&lang=en# [Google Scholar]
  16. Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context (2020). Sustainable development in the European Union. Eurostat. (Retrieved from : https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/KS-02-20-202 [Google Scholar]
  17. Guellec, D., Van Pottelsberghe, B. (2000). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Retrieved from : https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/192863594.pdf [Google Scholar]
  18. Keuschnigg, C., Ribi, E. (2010). Profit taxation, innovation and the financing of heterogeneous firms. Centre for Economic Policy Research. Retrieved from : https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6387093.pdf 41 [Google Scholar]
  19. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (Corporate author). (2017, August 16). Interim evaluation of Horizon 2020. Publications office of EU. Retrieved from : https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fad8c173-7e42-11e7-b5c6-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-77918455 [Google Scholar]
  20. Elvekrok, I., Veflen, N., Nilsen, E. R., Gausdal, A. H. (2018). Firm innovation benefits from regional triple-helix networks. Regional Studies, 52(9), 1214-1224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pan, W., Zhao, P., Ding, X. (2019). The effects of network structure on research innovation: an analysis from a content perspective using the data of R&D funding. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(12), 1430-1446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Portal of state programs of the Russian Federation (2020). Values of indicators and program financing. Retrieved from : https://programs.gov.ru/Portal/program/14/financing [Google Scholar]
  23. Portal of state programs of the Russian Federation (2020). Information about achieving the state program indicators. Retrieved from : https://programs.gov.ru/Portal/program/16/report_indicators [Google Scholar]
  24. World Bank (2020). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). Retrieved from : https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?end=2017&start=2012&view=chart [Google Scholar]
  25. Commodity structure of imports (2020, August 18). Indicators characterizing import substitution in Russia. Federal State Statistic Service. Retrieved from : https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/11188 [Google Scholar]
  26. Skalicka, M., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A.P., & Meluzin, T. (2019). Why do companies go public? Evidence from Prague Stock Exchange. Entrepreneurial Business and Economic Review, 7(1), 181-199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kliestik, T., Misankova, M., Valaskova, K., Svabova, L. (2018). Bankruptcy prevention: new effort to reflect on legal and social changes. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 791-803. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.