Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 97, 2021
International Conference “Technological Educational Vision” (TEDUVIS 2020)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 08 February 2021
  1. Allen, D., Shoard, M. Spreading the Load: Mobile Information and Communications Technologies and their Effect on Information Overload. Information Research, 2005, 10 (2), p. 227. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bawden, D., Robinson, L. The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and other Paradoxes and Pathologies // Journal of Information Science, XX (X) 2008, 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bilyalova AA, Lyubova TV, Valeeva AR. Multicultural Education and Its Targets in The Process Of Intercultural Competence Formation: (Based On Foreign Languages Teaching Experience) / International Journal of Scientific Study September 2017. Vol 5. Issue 65(6):93-96. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, S., Ley, K. A Learning Strategy to compensate for Cognitive Overload in Online Learning. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2006, 5(1), 104-117. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: [Google Scholar]
  5. Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, J.M., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. 2014. The Internet in face-to-face higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 149-159 [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340. [Google Scholar]
  7. Foehr, U. Media Multitasking among American Youth: Prevalence, Predictors and Pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2006 [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  8. Gasser, U., Palfrey, J. Mastering Multitasking// Educational leadership, 66 (6), 14-19. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  9. Gantz, J.F. The Expanding Digital Universe: A Forecast of Worldwide Information Growth through 2010. Framingham, MA: IDC [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenfield, P. Mind and Media: the Effects of Television, Video Games and Computers. Harvard University Press, 1984. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  11. Ignatov N. Yu. Multitasking and student performance // Open and distance education. 2014. 3 (55). Pp. 5-11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hembrooke H., & Gay, G. The Laptop and the Lecture: The Effects of Multitasking in Learning Environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2003, 15(1), 4664. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: [Google Scholar]
  13. S.T., Horvitz, E. Disruption and Recovery of Computing Tasks [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, Q., Ravid, G., Rafaeli, S. Information Overload and The Message Dynamics of Online Inte-raction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration. Information System Research, 2004, 15(2), 194-210. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, Q., Ravid, G., Rafaeli, S. Information Overload and The Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration. Information System Research, 2004, (2), 194-210. [Electronic resource]. Access mode :,. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones, C. & Shao, B. The NET Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy, 2011 [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  17. Jungo, R. In-class Multitasking and Academic Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, Vol. 28, Issue 6, 2236-2243. [Google Scholar]
  18. Keen A. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture. Nicholas Bradley Publishing, London, 2007. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  19. Kirsch, D. Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload. Intellectica, 2000, 1(30), 19-51 [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  20. Levine, L.E., Waite, B.M., Bowman, L.L. Can Students really Multitask? Computers & Education, Vol. 54, Iss. 4, May 2010, 927-931. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lavie, N. Distracted and confused? Selective Attention under Load. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 2005, 9(2), 75-82. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lyubova T.V., Gilfanova G.T. Scientific researches analysis in digital multitasking field of educational process in modern universities and determination of new conceptual boundaries of it. Integrated Science in Digital Age, - ICIS 2019. -- N°78. - pp. 277-288 [Google Scholar]
  23. McPeak, D. Multitasking vs Switch-tasking [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  24. Medina, J. Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. Seatle, Pear Press, 2008. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  25. Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A.D. Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106 (37), 15583-15587 [Electronic resource]. Access mode : doi:10.1073/pnas.0903620106. [Google Scholar]
  26. Prensky, M. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom: Hopeful Essays to 21st Century Learning. Corwin Press, 2012. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  27. Ravizza, S., Hambrick, D., Fenn, K. Non-academic Internet use in the Classroom is negatively related to Classroom Learning Regardless of Intellectual Ability: Computers & Education, 2014, 10(4),109-114. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosen, L. Teaching the iGeneration. Educational Leadership, 2007, 68(5), 10-15 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosen, L.D., Carrier, L.M., Cheever, N.A. Facebook And Texting Made Me Do It: Media- Induced Task-Switching While Studying. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 29, Issue 3, May 2013, 948-958. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D., Evans, J. Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001, 27(4), p. 763-797. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanbonmatsu, D., Strayer, D., Medeiros-Ward, N., Watson, J. Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking//PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(1) [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  32. Savolainen, P., Mannering, F. Effectiveness of Motorcycle Training and Motorcyclists’ Risk-Taking Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008, vol. 2031/2007, 52-58 [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  33. Small, G., Vorgan, G. Ibrain: Surviving the technological alteration of the modern mind. NewYork: Collins Living, 2008 [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  34. Study: Multitasking hinders learning. eSchool News. 2006, July 26. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: [Google Scholar]
  35. Verhaeghen, P., Salthouse, T. Meta-Analyses of Age-Cognition Relations in Adulthood: Estimates of Linear and Nonlinear Age Effects and Structural Models // Psychological Bulletin 1997, Vol. 122, No. 3, 231-249. No. 3, 231-249. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]
  36. Viadero, D. Instant Messaging found to slow Students’ Reading. Education Week, 2008, August15. [Electronic resource]. Access mode [Google Scholar]
  37. Willingham, D. Have Technology and Multitasking Rewired How Students Learn? American Educator, 2009, 34 (2), 23-28. [Electronic resource]. Access mode : [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.