Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 97, 2021
International Conference “Technological Educational Vision” (TEDUVIS 2020)
Article Number 01037
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 08 February 2021
  1. A. Urintsov, V. Dik, N. Dneprovskaya,. Individual learning trajectories as a key educational tool in the information society. Smart Digital Futures. Amsterdam: IOS Press BV, 652-657, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. A.L. Nazarenko. Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya: sintez traditsionnogo i elektronnogo obucheniya (opyt sozdaniya novoy modeli lektsionnogo kursa). [Informatization of education: synthesis of traditional and e-learning (experience of creating a new model of a lecture course)]. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal [Open Education. Scientific and practical journal], 2 (109), 71-72, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  3. O.M. Babanskaya, G.V. Mozhaeva, V.A. Serbin A.V, Feshchenko. Sistemnyy podkhod k organizatsii elektronnogo obucheniya v klassicheskom universitete. [A systematic approach to the organization of e-learning in a classical university]. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. [Open education. Scientific and practical journal], 2, 63-69, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Matveeva, I. Abramova, A. Ananyina, E. Shihmolina, N. Medvedeva, I. Mazaeva, A. Korenev, N. Tsvetkova. The magic of innovation. New techniques and technologies in teaching foreign languages. London: Cambridge press, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. T.P. Skorikova, S.S. Khromov, N.V. Dneprovskaya. Distance learning in scientific and professional fields of communication (interdisciplinary approach). Internet Journal of Environmental Science Education, 11 (10), 3467-3476, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. I.A. Leontyeva. Distantsionnoye obucheniye kak odno iz sredstv povysheniya kachestva obrazovaniya studentov v vuze. [Distance learning as one of the means of improving the quality of student education at a university]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University], 6, 84-88, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  7. T.M. Lomonosova. Digital learning resources: Enhancing efficiency within blended higher education. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 8 (6), 124-137, (2014). DOI: 10.15293/2226-3365.1806.08. Retrieved on October, 21, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. L.B. Osipova, O.M. Goreva. Distantsionnoye obucheniye v vuze: modeli i tekhnologii. [Distance learning at a university: models and technologies]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education], 5, (2014) Retrieved on November, 8, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  9. O.V. Kuznetsova. Distantsionnoye obucheniye: za i protiv. [Distance learning: pros and cons]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamentalnykh issledovaniy. [International Journal of Applied and Basic Research], 8 (part 2), 362-364, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. N.M. Pavlutskaya, L.V. Dubitskaya.. Primeneniye distantsionnogo obucheniya v sovremennom vuze (iz opyta raboty). [The use of distance learning in a modern university (from work experience)]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal [International scientific research journal], 3 (45), Part 4 March, 31-34, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  11. C. White. Distance learning of foreign languages. Language Teaching, 39, 247-264, (2006). doi:10.1017/S0261444806003727. Retrieved on October, 14, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  12. C.R. Sole, J. Hopkins. Contrasting Two Approaches to Distance Language Learning. Distance Education, 28(3), 351-370, (2007). DOI: 10.1080/01587910701611369. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Hanson. Displaced but not replaced: the impact of e-learning on academic identities in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14 (5), 553-564, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  14. A.T. Mohr, D. Holtbrugge, N. Berg. Learning style preferences and the perceived usefulness of e-learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 17 (3), 309-322, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  15. M.A. Peters, P. Jandric. Dewey’s Democracy and Education in the age of digital reason: the global, ecological and digital turns. Open Review of Educational Research, 4 (1), 205-218, (2017). DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2017.139529016. Retrieved on November, 8, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Schneider. A concept to simplify authoring of adaptive hypermedia e-learning structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 26 (6), 760-775, (2018). DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2017.1412987. Retrieved on November, 11, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. M-C. Tsai, C-W. Tsai. Applying online externally-facilitated regulated learning and computational thinking to improve students’ learning. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17 (4), 811-820, (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s10209-017-0542-z. Retrieved on October, 14, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. K.A. Jones, R.S. Sharma. An experiment in blended learning: Learning without lectures. IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), 1-6, (2017). DOI: Retrieved on October, 14, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. Q. Wang, C. Huang. Pedagogical, social and technical designs of a blended synchronous learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49 (3), 451-462, (2018). DOI: Retrieved on October, 14, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  20. R.S. Baragash, H. Al-Samarraie. Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35 (7), 2082-2098, (2018). DOI: Retrieved on October, 14, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Hilgenberg & W. Tolone. Student perceptions of satisfaction and opportunities for critical thinking in distance education by interactive video. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14 (3), 59-73 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Sampson. Meeting the Needs of Distance Learners. Language, Learning & Technology, 7(3), 103-118, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  23. A.H. Isik. R. Karakis & I. Güler. Postgraduate students’ attitudes towards distance learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 218-222, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Rashid, A.G. Khokhar & A.A. Tahir. Learner’s Attitude towards Printed Word in Distance Education. Journal of Educational Research, 16 (1), 106-111, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Emrah. Distance-education in foreign language teaching: evaluations from the perspectives of freshman students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 390 - 397, (2015). https://doi:0.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.487. Retrieved on October, 14, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Pyrchenkova, E. Radchenko, M. Kozin. Creation of digital educational environment for police leaders. E3S Web of Conferences 210, 02004 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  27. A.A. Andreyev. Stanovleniye i razvitiye distantsionnogo obucheniya v Rossii. [Formation and development of distance learning in Russia]. Otkrytoye obrazovaniye. [Open education], 10, 40-46, (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.