Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 100, 2021
IV International Scientific Congress “Society of Ambient Intelligence – 2021” (ISCSAI 2021)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Business Communication and Linguistics
Published online 25 March 2021
  1. N. Silove, Beyond the Buzzword: The Three Meanings of “Grand Strategy”, Security Studies, 27 (1), 27–57, (2018) doi: 10.1080/09636412.2017.1360073 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grand Strategies in War and Peace, ed. by P. Kennedy, New Haven, Yale University Press (1991). [Google Scholar]
  3. J.L. Gaddis, What Is Grand Strategy? Prepared as the Karl Von Der Heyden Distinguished Lecture, Duke University, February 26, 2009, the keynote address for a conference on “American Grand Strategy after War”, Accessed 12 Jan 2021 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ukaz Prezydenta Pro rishennya Rady natsional’noyi bezpeky i oborony Ukrayiny vid 14 veresnya 2020 roku “Pro Stratehiyu natsional’noyi bezpeky Ukrayiny”. Zaklyuchni polozhennya (Decree of the President on the Decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine “On the National Security Strategy of Ukraine”. Final provisions) 12 Accessed 14 January 2021 [Google Scholar]
  5. Joint Strategic Plan FY 2018-2022, U.S. Department of State U.S. Agency for International Development, February, 2018 Accessed 12 January 2021 [Google Scholar]
  6. Polish Foreign Policy Strategy 2017-2021 Accessed 12 January 2021 [Google Scholar]
  7. The Strategy of Actions for five priority areas of development of the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2017-2021 Accessed 12 January 2021 [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Mowlana, Toward a NWICO for the Twenty First Century, Journal of International Affairs, 47, 59–72 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Nye, Soft Power, Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171 (1990). doi: 10.2307/1148580P.164 [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Gilboa, Digital Diplomacy, in The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, ed. by C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp, pp. 540–551 (London, Sage, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Gilboa Diplomacy in the media age: Three models of uses and effects, Diplomacy and Statecraft, 12(2), 1–28, (2001) doi: 10.1080/09592290108406201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ch. Paul, Strategic Communication: Origins, Concepts and Current Debates (Praeger, 2011), p. 220 [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Huijgh. in The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy, ed. by C.M. Constantinou, P. Kerr, P. Sharp, pp. 437–450 (London, Sage, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Cohen, Media Diplomacy (London: Frank Cass, 1986), p. 7. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ukraiins’ka pryzma: Zovnishnya polityka 2019. Analitychne doslidzhennya, (Ukrainian prism: Foreign policy 2019. An analytical research) (HO «Rada zovnishn’oi polityky «Ukrains’ka pryzma», Fond im. F. Eberta, Kyiv, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. Ukrainian Institute: mission AccessedJan 15 2021 [Google Scholar]
  17. Manor, E. Segev, America’s selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts, in Digital diplomacy: theory and practice, ed. by C. Bjola, M. Holmes. (Routledge, 2015), pp. 89–107 [Google Scholar]
  18. Sandre, Twitter for Diplomats (Geneva: DiploFoundation, 2013) Accessed 21 Jan 2021 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sabrina Sotiriu. Digital diplomacy. Between promises and reality, in Digital diplomacy: theory and practice, ed. by C. Bjola, M. Holmes. (Routledge, 2015), pp. 33–51. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kontseptsiya zovnishn’oyi polityky Ukrayiny. Ekspertni rekomendatsiyi, ed. by Ye. Haber, S. Korsunskyi, H. Shelest. (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.