Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 100, 2021
IV International Scientific Congress “Society of Ambient Intelligence – 2021” (ISCSAI 2021)
Article Number 05012
Number of page(s) 7
Section Ecology and Living Space
Published online 25 March 2021
  1. A. Karpenko, K. Basenko, Highly Effective Corporate Culture as an Instrument of Talents’ Attracting and Retaining. Balt. J. of Econ. Stud. 3(4), 101–106 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Antonyuk, I. Pidorycheva, Strat. Pan. 2, 116–123 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu. Yarmolenko, Theor. & Pract. Publ. Admin. 2(53), 107–111 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. M. Romer, J. Econ. Perspect. 8(1), 3–22 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. E. Lucas, J. Monet. Econ. 22, 3–42 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. I. Jones, Paul Romer: Ideas, Nonrivalry, and Endogenous Growth. Scand. J. of Econ. 121(3), 859–883 (2019) doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. M. Solow, Quart. J. Econ. 70(1), 65–94 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Borodina, Imperatives of complementary development in agrosphere. Econ. & Forecast. 4, 125–136 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Vasylieva, Factors of Labor Productivity Growth in Agriculture of the Agrarian Region. Balt. J. of Econ. Stud. 3(4), 1–6 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. R. M. Solow, Rev. Econ. Stat. (1961), abSubREAS1961.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Barro, X. Sala-i-Martin, J. Pol. Econ. 100, 223–251 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Gonda, BIATEC. XIII(11), 22–25 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  13. O. M. Vilchynska, Y. M. Panochyshyn, T.O. Kushnir, Her. Khmeln. Nat. Univ. Econ. Sc. 2(1), 177–181 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. I. N. Lyashenko, L.Z. Khrushch, Econ. Her. Donbas. 16 184–188 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Mundiak, R. Butzer, D. F. Larson, Heterogeneous technology and panel data: The case of the agricultural production function. J. Dev. Econ. 99(1), 139–149 (2012) doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.11.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Mankiv, D. Romer, D. Weil, Quart. J. Econ. 107(2), 407–438 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Romer, Amer. Econ. Rev. 86(2), 202–206 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Oliner, D. Sichel, J. Econ. Pers. 14, 3–22 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Kozak, Intellectual Capital as a Key Factor of Socio-Economic Development of Regions and Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance. 6, 288–295 (2013) doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00142-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. V. Karpenko, Rozvytok intelektual’nykh aktyviv lyuds’koho potentsialu: teoriya tapraktyka (The Development of Intellectual Assets of Human Potential: theory and practice). (FOP V.V. Mokshanov, Zaporizhzhya, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. L. V. Shaulska, Strategiya rozvytku trudovogo potencialu Ukrayiny (Development strategy of labor potential of Ukraine), (In-t ekonomiky promyslovosti NAN Ukrayiny, Doneczk, 2005). [Google Scholar]
  22. L. I. Voynicha, Youn. Sc. 3(55), 642–646 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. O. Vasyl’yeva, in Organizational problems of life quality management in the conditions of globalization, ed. by M. Duczmal, T. Nestorenko (The Academy of Management and Administration in Opole, Opole, 2020), p.428. [Google Scholar]
  24. Official site of (2020) the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Accessed 28 Sept 2020. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.