Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 101, 2021
SAHD 2021 - 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference 2021 “Modern Science: Problems and Development Prospects (Social and Humanitarian Directions)”
Article Number 03024
Number of page(s) 9
Section Actual Problems of Pedagogy and Psychology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110103024
Published online 26 April 2021
  1. N. F. Alefirenko, Alive Ward: Issues of Functional Lexicography (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. N. F. Alefirenko, X Linguae, 2, 32 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. O. Aleshina, Semantic Modeling Linguomethaphorological Rresearch: Based on Russian (2003) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Aumüller, Handbook of Narratolog, 854 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Babenko, Philological Analysis of Text, Theory Basis, Principals, and Aspects of Analysis (2004) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Beaugrande, W.U. Dressler, Einführung in die Text linguistic (1981) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Beaugrande, A New Introduction to the Study of Text and Discourse (2004), http://beaugrande.com/ [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Belousov, Vestnik of Orenburg State University, 11(117), 94 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Boldyrev, Cognitive Studies of Language (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Boldyrev, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Cramer, Hypermedia Literary Journal (2001) http://www.dvara.net/ [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Croft, A. Cruse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2004) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Cuddon, The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory (1992) [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Currie, Work and Text. Philosophy of Literature. Contemporary and Classic Readings. An Anthology, 98 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Demyankov, Paper presented the 4th International Conference Language, culture, society (2007) [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Eagleton, Literary Theory. An Introduction (2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Eaton,Literature Semantics (2010) [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Fauconnier, The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure (I) 230 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Galperin, Text as the Object of Linguistic Research (2007) [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Goodman, K. Elgin, Philosophy of Literature, Contemporary and Classic Readings, 93 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Hidalgo, Negation, Text Worlds, and Discourse. The Pragmatics of Fiction (2000) [Google Scholar]
  22. E. D. Hirsch, Twentieth-Century Literary Theory. A Reader, 51 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Hyvärinen, Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations & Interventions, 2/1, 10 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  24. Ph. Johnson-Laird, Mental Models, Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness (1983) [Google Scholar]
  25. V. Karasik, Language personality: institutional and personal discourse, 5 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  26. V. Karasik, Language Matrix of Culture (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Klarer, An introduction to Literary Studies (2011) [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Kneepkens, R. Zwaan, Poetics, 23(1-2), 125 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Lakoff, Berkeley Cognitive Science Report, 275 (1984) J. Langer, Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction (2010) [Google Scholar]
  30. D. F. N. Lee, Language Learning & Technology, 5/3, 37 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Levine, W. Horton, Scientific study of literature, 3, 105(2013). [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Levinson, Philosophy of Literature. Contemporary and Classic Reading. An Anthology 98 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. Lotman, About the Art (1998) [Google Scholar]
  34. P. Macherey, Theory of Literary Production (2006) [Google Scholar]
  35. K. McCarthy, & S.R. Goldman, Constructing Interpretive Inferences about Literary Text: The Role of Domain-Specific Knowledge (2017) [Google Scholar]
  36. L. Miller, World of Russian Ward, 4, 41 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Ogneva, Cognitive Studies of Language 550 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Ogneva, Transformation of Socium Discourse Model: Problems and Perspectives, The International Conference Risks in changeable social reality: problem of prediction and management. Russian: Voronezh: OOO “PT”, November (2015) [Google Scholar]
  39. E. Ogneva, D. Nikulina, E. Musaelian, R.E. Bogachev, A. Kutsenko, I. Danilenko,. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 729 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  40. N. Panasenko, Semantic Space of Literary Text. The 9th International Conference Semantic of Speech and Text. Ukraine: Ivano-Frankivsk. September (2006) [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Piotrovsky, Issues of Roman and General Linguistics 86 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  42. P. Ricoeur, Conflict of Interpretations (2002) [Google Scholar]
  43. I. Schirova, Language Modeling of Cognitive Processes in English Psychological Prose of 20th century (2001) [Google Scholar]
  44. I. Schirova, Text Through the Prism of Complex (2013) [Google Scholar]
  45. I. Schirova, Vestnik of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin. 7, 1, 163 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  46. F. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutics (2004) [Google Scholar]
  47. A. Sedykh, Zh. Yonghua, D. Shchukina, O. Vorobeva, S. Nikonov, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 4, 9039 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  48. R. Selden, P. Widdowson, P. Brooker, Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory (2005) [Google Scholar]
  49. E. Semino, Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps (2009) [Google Scholar]
  50. V. Shtof, Modeling and Philosophy (1966) [Google Scholar]
  51. N. Tincheva, Discourse and Interaction, 2, 85 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  52. N. Valgina, Text Theory (2003) [Google Scholar]
  53. L. Zunshine, Why We Read Fiction Theory of Mind and the Novel (2006) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.