Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 102, 2021
The 3rd ETLTC International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ETLTC2021)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 9
Section Technology Assisted Language Learning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110201014
Published online 03 May 2021
  1. E. Lee, Y.B. Kafai, V. Vasudevan, R.L. Davis, in Playful user interfaces (Springer, 2014), pp. 277–292 [Google Scholar]
  2. R.W. Bybee, N.M. Landes, Science for life & living: An elementary school science program from biological sciences curriculum study, The American Biology Teacher 52, 92 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  3. R.W. Bybee, Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. (ERIC, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Cardak, M. Dikmenli, O. Saritas, Effect of 5E instructional model in student success in primary school 6th year circulatory system topic., in AsiaPacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching (2008), Vol. 9, issue: 2 [Google Scholar]
  5. D.W. Shaffer, K.R. Squire, R. Halverson, J.P. Gee, Video games and the future of learning, Phi delta kappan 87, 105 (2005), publisher: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA [Google Scholar]
  6. A.N. Antle, Designing tangibles for children: what designers need to know, in CHI’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2007), pp. 2243–2248 [Google Scholar]
  7. M.S. Horn, R.J. Jacob, Tangible programming in the classroom with tern, in CHI’07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (2007), pp. 1965–1970 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. media lab, Tech. rep., MIT (2012), https://llk.media.mit.edu/projects/3428/ [Google Scholar]
  9. B.M. Collective, D. Shaw, Makey Makey: improvising tangible and nature-based user interfaces, in Proceedings of the sixth international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (2012), pp. 367–370 [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. Kafai, V. Vasudevan, Hi-Lo tech games: crafting, coding and collaboration of augmented board games by high school youth, in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (2015), pp. 130–139 [Google Scholar]
  11. M.A. Garcia-Ruiz, P.C. Santana-Mancilla, L.S. Gaytan-Lugo, Measuring technology acceptance of Makey Makey as an input device in a humancomputer interaction class, in EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2016), pp. 395–400 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Resnick, E. Rosenbaum, Designing for tinkerability, Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators pp. 163–181 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Makey, Tech. rep., Makey Makey (2020), https://makeymakey.com/pages/how-to [Google Scholar]
  14. A.N. Antle, A.F. Wise, Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design, Interacting with Computers 25, 1 (2013), publisher: OUP [Google Scholar]
  15. E.S. Cramer, A.N. Antle, Button matrix: how tangible interfaces can structure physical experiences for learning, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (2015), pp. 301–304 [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Kokkonis, E. Gounopoulos, D. Tsiamitros, D. Stimoniaris, G.F. Fragulis, Designing interconnected haptic interfaces and actuators for teleoperations in mobile ad hoc networks, International Journal of Entertainment Technology and Management 1, 43 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Rogers, Y.k. Lim, W.R. Hazlewood, P. Marshall, Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays?, Human–Computer Interaction 24, 79 (2009), publisher: Taylor & Francis [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Schneider, P. Jermann, G. Zufferey, P. Dillenbourg, Benefits of a tangible interface for collaborative learning and interaction, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 222 (2010), publisher: IEEE [Google Scholar]
  19. L.M. Schreiber, B.E. Valle, Social constructivist teaching strategies in the small group classroom, Small Group Research 44, 395 (2013), publisher: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA [Google Scholar]
  20. O. Zuckerman, S. Arida, M. Resnick, Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (2005), pp. 859–868 [Google Scholar]
  21. G.F. Fragulis, L. Lazaridis, M. Papatsimouli, I.A. Skordas, O.D.E.S.: An Online Dynamic Examination System based on a CMS WordPress plugin, in 2018 South-Eastern European Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Society Media Conference (SEEDA_CECNSM) (IEEE, Kastoria, 2018), pp. 1–8, ISBN 978-618-83314-19, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8544928/ [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Lazaridis, M. Papatsimouli, G.F. Fragulis, S.A.T.E.P.: Synchronous-Asynchronous Teleeducation Platform, in Proceedings of the SouthEast European Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference on SEEDA-CECNSM ’16 (ACM Press, Kastoria, Greece, 2016), pp. 92–97, ISBN 978-14503-4810-2, http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2984393.2984395 [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Lazaridis, M. Papatsimouli, G.F. Fragulis, A synchronous-asynchronous tele-education platform, International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning 1, 122 (2019), publisher: Inderscience Publishers (IEL) [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Michailidi, I. Skordas, M. Papatsimouli, L. Lazaridis, H. Michailidis, S. Tavoultzidou, G.F. Fragulis, GrfKids: Development of a Greek language teaching platform via a Learning Management System for primary school pupils with Russian as a mother tongue (The ACM Chapter International Conference on Educational Technology,Language and Technical Communication (ETLTC), Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan, 2020), p. 8 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Papatsimouli, J. Skordas, L. Lazaridis, E. Michailidi, V. Saprikis, G.F. Fragulis, Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying in Greece: An Empirical Study (ETLTC2020-Virtual ACM Chapter Workshop on Professional and Social Media Communication, Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan, 20-22nd August 2020, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. I.A. Skordas, N. Tsirekas, N. Kolovos, G.F. Fragulis, A.G. Triantafyllou, M.G. Bouliou, e-Sem: Dynamic seminar management system for primary, secondary and tertiary education, in 2017 South Eastern European Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference (SEEDA-CECNSM) (IEEE, Kastoria, 2017), pp. 1–4, ISBN 978-618-83314-0-2, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8088228/ [Google Scholar]
  27. G.R. Morrison, S.M. Ross, Designing effective online instruction, Online learning communities pp. 75–86 (2007), publisher: Information Age Publishing [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.