EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 124 (2021) SHS Web Conf., 124 (2021) 08007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 124, 2021
International Conference on Management, Social Sciences & Humanities (ICMeSH 2020)
Article Number 08007
Number of page(s) 10
Section Human Capital Management for Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112408007
Published online 15 November 2021
  1. Achor, S. (2016). The benefits of peer-to-peer praise at work. Harvard Business Review. Available online: https://hbr.org/2016/02/the-benefits-of-peer-to-peer-praise-at-work#comment-section [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brinkmann, S., and Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  3. Burker, M. (2016). The ultimate guide to peer employee recognition. Available online: https://inside.6q.io/the-ultimate-guide-to-peer-employee-recognition/ [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Byam, M. (2015). Peer-to-peer recognition: Giving workers the appreciation they crave. Canadian HR Reporter, Vol. 28, No. 7, p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Collis, J. and Hussey, R. (2014). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students (4th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  6. Creelman, D. (2016). How peer to peer recognition improve performances and increases feedback. Talent Space Blog. Available online: http://www.halogensoftware.com/blog/how-peer-recognition-improves-performance-and-increases-feedback [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniels, A. C. (1989). Performance management: Improving quality productivity through positive reinforcement, 3rd ed., pp. 95–96. Tucker, GA: Performance Management. [Google Scholar]
  8. GloboForce (2015). 2015 Employee Recognition Report. Available online: http://go.globoforce.com/rs/862-JIQ-698/images/GloboforceSHRM2015.pdf [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gostick, A., & Elton, C. (2008). The Power of Peers Can Keep Employees Motivated. NJBIZ, Vol. 21, No. 30, p. 21. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gribben, V., Bogetz, A., Bachrach, L. and Blankenburg, R. (2018). The Golden Ticket Project for peer recognition. The clinical teacher. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hansen, F., Smith, M. and Hansen, R. B. (2002). Rewards and recognition in employee motivation. Compensation & Benefits Review, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 64-72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hastings, R. R. (2009). Peer-to-Peer Recognition Good, But Not Enough. HR Magazine, Vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 24-26. [Google Scholar]
  13. Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. [Google Scholar]
  14. Irvine, D. (2012). Peer-to-peer recognition: It only works if you also have real rewards. Talent Management and HR. Available online: https://www.eremedia.com/tlnt/peer-to-peer-recognition-it-only-works-if-you-also-have-real-rewards/ [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  15. Long, R. J. and Shields, J. L. (2010). From pay to praise? Non-cash employee recognition in Canadian and Australian firms. The International Journal of HR Management, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1145-1172. [Google Scholar]
  16. Luthans, K. (2000). Recognition: A powerful, but often overlooked, leadership tool to improve employee performance. Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol. 7, No 1, pp. 31-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mazzei, M. J., Flynn, C. B. and Haynie, J. J. (2016). Moving beyond initial success: Promoting innovation in small businesses through high-performance work practices. Business Horizons, Vol. 59, No 1, pp. 51-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. McCarney, R., Warner, J., Iliffe, S., Van Haselen, R., Griffin, M. and Fisher, P. (2007). The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC medical research methodology, Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Melia, K. (2000). Conducting an interview. Nurse Researcher, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 75-89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Merriam, S. B. and Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation, 4th ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson, B. (2004). Employee Recognition That Works. ABA Bank Marketing, Vol. 36, No. 10, p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  23. Nelson, B. (2016). You get what you reward: A research-based approach to employee recognition. In M. J. Grawitch and D. W. Ballad The psychologically healthy workplace: Building a win-win environment for organizations and employees. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, viii, 272, pp. 157-179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2015). Research methods for business students, 7th ed. New York: Pearson Education. [Google Scholar]
  25. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith, C. L. (2014). Employee recognition at work: A study experience. University of York. [Google Scholar]
  27. Steele, D. (2016). Pros and cons of peer review in workplace. Council for Adult and Experiential Learning. Available online: http://www.cael.org/talent-crunch-blog/pros-and-cons-of-peer-review-in-the-workplace [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  28. TINYpulse (2015). Employee Engagement Survey 2015. Available online: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/443262/2015EmployeeEngagementOrganizationalCultureReport.pdf [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, Vol. 5, pp. 147-158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vranjes, T. (2014). Held in High Regard. HR Magazine, Vol. 59, No. 11, pp. 54-56. [Google Scholar]
  31. White, P. (2017). Why most employee recognition doesn’t work. Association for Talent Development. Available online: https://www.td.org/Publications/Blogs/Human-Capital-Blog/2017/02/Why-Most-Employee-Recognition-Doesnt-Work [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]
  32. Whiting, L. S. (2008). Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers. Nursing Standard, Vol. 22, No. 23, pp. 35-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Worldatwork (2015). Trends in Employee Recognition Research. Available online: https://www.itagroup.com/sites/default/files/2015%20Trends%20in%20Employee%20Recognition%20Report.pdf [Accessed 24/02/2019]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.