Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 129, 2021
The 21st International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2021
Article Number 05007
Number of page(s) 10
Section Innovation, Collaborative, and Circular Economy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202112905007
Published online 16 December 2021
  1. Acosta, A. L., Maharjan, P., Peyriere, H. M., & Rusyan, J. (2020). Natural capital protection indicators: Measuring performance in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals for green growth transition. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 8, 100069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birbirenko, S., Zhadanova, Y., & Banket, N. (2020). Influence of pandemic of coronavirus resilience of Ukrainian enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 183, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Capasso, M. (2021). Degrowth or green growth: A reflection on the Recent public discourse in Norway. Sustainability, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. European commission. (2020, October 5). Circular Economy Action Plan. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/circulareconomy/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Halaj, D., Sedliačiková, M., & Malá, D. (2018). Customer Behavior on the Slovakian Roundwood Market: A Case Study. Bioresources, 13(3), 6003-6020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2019). Is Green Growth Possible? New Political Economy, 25, 469–486. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hojsík, M., Hegyi, L., & Remeta, J. (2020, October 5). Plán ZELENEJ obnovy. https://www.incien.sk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Zelen%C3%A1Obnova.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. Chapman, A. (2020). Impacts of Covid-19 on a Transitioning Energy System, Society and International Cooperation. Sustainability, 12, 8232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnsson, S., Andersson, E., Thollander, P., & Karlsson, M. (2019). Energy savings and greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the Swedish wood industry. Energy, 187(15), 115919. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Y. C., Kuo, R., & Shih, S. (2020). Covid-19: The first documented coronavirus pandemic in history. Biromedical Journal, 43(4), 328-333. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lorincová, S., Stachová, K., Stacho, Z., & Joniaková, Z. (2020). Defining the Differences in Corporate Culture in Woodprocessing and Forest Enterprises. Bioresources, 15(2), 3320-3343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Malá, D., Sedliačiková, M., Dušak, M., Kaščáková, A., Musová, Z., & Klementová, J. (2017). Green Logistics in the Context of Sustainable Development in Small and Medium Enterprises. Drvna Industrija, 68(1), 69-79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malá, D., Sedliačiková, M., Kaščáková, A., Benčiková, D., Vavrová, K., & Bikár, M. (2017). Green Logistics in Slovak Small and Medium Wood-Processing Enterprises. Bioresources, 12(3), 5155-5173. [Google Scholar]
  14. OECD. (2010, October 5). Eco-Innovation in Industry: Enabling Green Growth OECD. http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/browseit/9209061E [Google Scholar]
  15. OECD. (2011, October 5). Towards Green Growth, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/env/towards-green-growth-9789264111318-en.htm [Google Scholar]
  16. Ondrejka, V., Gergeľ, T., Bucha, T., & Pástor, M. (2020). Innovative methods of non-destructive evaluation of log quality. Central European Forestry Journal, 66(1), 3–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2019, October 5). Decoupling Debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. A study edited by the European Environment Bureau EEB. https://eeb.org/library/decoupling-debunked/ [Google Scholar]
  18. Sarkodie, S. A., & Owusu, P. A. (2021). Escalation effect of fossil-based CO2 emissions improves green energy innovation. Science of the Total Environment, 785. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sedliačiková, M., Stroková, Z., Drábek, J., & Malá, D. (2019). Controlling implementation: What are the benefits and barriers for employees of wood processing enterprises. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen, 61(2), 163-173. [Google Scholar]
  20. Szovics, P. (2020, October 5). Bude rok 2021 začiatkom zeleného ekonomického rastu? https://www.trend.sk/technologie/bude-rok-2021-zaciatkom-zeleneho-ekonomickeho-rastu [Google Scholar]
  21. Šulyová, D., & Koman, G. (2020). The Significance of IoT Technology in Improving Logistical Processes and Enhancing Competitiveness: A Case Study on the World´s and Slovakia´s Wood-Processing Enterprises. Sustainability, 12, 7804. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vetráková, M., & Sedliačiková, M. (2020). Indikátory zeleného rastu pre kvantifikáciu efektívnosti a výkonnosti drevospracujúceho priemyslu v Slovenskej republike. TUZVO. [Google Scholar]
  23. Vogelpohl, T., Beer, K., Ewert, B., Perbandt, D., Töller, A. E., & Böcher. (2021). Patterns of European bioeconomy policy. Insights from a cross-case study of three policy areas. Environmental Politics, Early access [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, K., Peng, W., & Wang, L. (2018). Efficiency analysis of wood processing industry in China during 2006-2015. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 332(5), 052062. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.