EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 134 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 134 (2022) 00019 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 134, 2022
14th Session of Euro-Asian Law Congress “The value of law” 2021
Article Number 00019
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400019
Published online 09 February 2022
  1. R. Branum, S.M. Wolf, International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 43(3) (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.P. Vershinin, Choice of a method for protecting civil rights (St. Petersburg, 2000) p. 35 [Google Scholar]
  3. K.P. Rippe, A. Willemsen, The idea of precaution: Ethical requirements for the regulation of new biotechnologies in the environmental field, Frontiers in Plant Science, 871, 1868 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Krekora-Zając, Civil liability for damages related to germline and embryo editing against the legal admissibility of gene editing, Palgrave Commun., 6, 30 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0399-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Wagner, Ethical Aspects of the German Genetic Diagnostics Act, Deutsches Referenzzentrum fur Ethik in den Biowissenschaften (2016). Retrieved from: http://www.drze.de/in-focus/predictive-genetic-testing/ethical-aspects [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Flatau et al., Genomic information and a person's right not to know: A closer look at variations in hypothetical informational preferences in a German sample, PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0198249 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. HB 1189: Genetic Information for Insurance Purposes. Retrieved from: https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2020/1189 [Google Scholar]
  8. H.R.493 - Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. 05/21/2008 Became Public Law No: 110-233. Retrieved from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/110th-congress/house-bill/493/text. [Google Scholar]
  9. ABC v St. George's Healthcare NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 139. England and Wales High Court (Queen's Bench Division) Decisions. Retrieved from: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2015/1394.html. [Google Scholar]
  10. T.W. Baker, The Legal Aspects of Health Care Business Transactions: A Complete Guide to the Law Governing Health Industry Business Organization, Transactions, and Governance (Coronat Services, LLC, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Shiho, Y. Kanamaru, Japanese Employment Law (2020). Retrieved from: https://iclg.com/practice-areas/employment-and-labour-laws-and-regulations/japan. [Google Scholar]
  12. Federal Law of 05.07.1996 No. 86-FZ "On State Regulation in the Field of Genetic Engineering". Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, No. 28, Art. 3348 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  13. Family Code of the Russian Federation. Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, No. 1, Art. 16 (1 January 1996) [Google Scholar]
  14. Federal Law of 21.11.2011 No. 323-FZ "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation". Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, No. 48, Art. 6724 (28 November 2011) [Google Scholar]
  15. Federal Law of May 20, 2002 No. 54-FZ "On a temporary ban on human cloning". Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation, No. 21, Art. 1917 (27 May 2002) [Google Scholar]
  16. N.V. Bogatyreva, V.E. Rossik, V.A. Bogatyrev, N.V. Shishkinskaya, Commentary on the Federal Law of July 5, 1996 N 86-FZ "On State Regulation in the Field of Genetic Engineering" (itemized). Retrieved from: "Consultant" Reference Legal System [Google Scholar]
  17. I. De Miguel Beriain, A.M. Marcos del Cano, Gene editing in human embryos. A comment on the Ethical Issues Involved. In: Soniewicka (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Ishii, Germ line genome editing in clinics: the approaches, objective and global society, Brief Funct. Genomics, 16(1), 46–56 (2017). Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5291189/. [Google Scholar]
  19. J.A. Doudna, S.H. Sternberg, A crack in creation: gene editing and the unthinkable power to control evolution (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Houghton, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Savulescu, J. Pungh, T. Doiglas, Ch. Gyngell, The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos, Protein Cell, 6(7), 476—179 (2015). Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4491050 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Russian biologist plans more CRISPR-edited babies (10.06.2019) Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01770-x [Google Scholar]
  22. Ethical Guidelines for Human Genome, Gene Analysis Research March 29, 2001 with the amendments as of 2013. Retrieved from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10600000-Daijinkanboukouseikagakuka/0000153405.pdf [Google Scholar]
  23. Human Tissue Act (2004). Retrieved from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/section/32/enacted [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Boggio, C. Romano, J. Almqvist (Eds.), Human Germline Genome Modification and the Right to Science: A Comparative Study of National Laws and Policies (Cambridge University Press, 2019) pp. 241–265 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.