Open Access
| Issue |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 17 | |
| Section | Discours, pragmatique et interaction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213801003 | |
| Published online | 11 May 2022 | |
- Andler, D. (2000). The normativity of context. Philosophical Studies, 100(3), p. 273-303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Berthoz, A., Debru, C. (éds) (2015). Anticipation et prédiction : du geste au voyage mental. Paris : Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
- Bock, K., Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, p. 1-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brunner, P. (2019). Le vague comme terrain d’observation de discours hors-normes. In K. Collette, A. Steuckardt (dir.) Écrits hors-normes. Sherbrooke : Les Éditions de l’Université de Sherbrooke, p. 79-91. [Google Scholar]
- Carston, R. (2002). Utterances and Thoughts: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford : Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Drai, N., De Saussure, L. (2016). Quand l’implicite devient explicite : d’un accident expérimental à une étude pilote. Syntaxe et sémantique, n°7, p. 115-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fayol, M., Alamargot, D., Berninger, V. (2012). Translation of Thought to Written Text While Composing: Advancing Theory, Knowledge, Research Methods, and Applications. New York – London: Taylor & Francis. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fetzer, A. (ed.). (2007). Context and Appropriateness: micro meets macro. Amsterdam : John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- Fiala, P., Pineira, C., Sériot, P. (1989). Présentation. Mots, 21, p. 3-4. [Google Scholar]
- Foss, D.J. (1982). A discourse on semantic priming. Cognitive Psychology, 14(4), p. 590-607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. Shaw, J. Bransford (éd.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. L. Erlbaum, p. 67-82. [Google Scholar]
- Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, p. 41–58. [Google Scholar]
- Heritage, J., Greatbatch, D. (1991). On Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: the Case of News Interviews. In D. Boden, D. Zimmerman (dir.) Talk and Social Structure. Cambridge : Polity Press, p. 94-137. [Google Scholar]
- Hoey, J. (2001). Text Interaction. An introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Hoey, J. (2005). Lexical Priming. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2019). Heurs et malheurs du partage du sens. In G. Cislaru, V. Nyckees (dir.) Le partage du sens. Approches linguistiques du sens commun. Londres : ISTE Editions (Les concepts fondateurs de la philosophie du langage), p. 199-219. [Google Scholar]
- Krieg-Planque, A. (2018). Les instruments de la critique politique et sociale comme objets pour l’étude des idéologies langagières : l’exemple d’un ‘’Atelier de désintoxication de la langue de bois”. Circula, 7, 29-50. [Google Scholar]
- Levelt, P. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78-106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Partington, A. (2014). Evaluative Prosody. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: CUP, p. 279 – 303. [Google Scholar]
- Pickering, M.J., Garrod S. (2013). Forward models and their implications for production, comprehension, and dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 377-392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rubinelli, S., Nakamoto, K., Schulz, P., Saussure, L. de (2006). What Are We to Think about Direct-to-Consumer Advertising? A Case-Study on the Adverts for Zoloft and Allega 180 mg. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), p. 337-348. [Google Scholar]
- Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4:1), p. 696-735. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.