EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 138 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 138 (2022) 01010 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 01010
Number of page(s) 15
Section Discours, pragmatique et interaction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213801010
Published online 11 May 2022
  1. Adorno, T.W. (1950). The Authoritarian personality. 1st edn. New York: Harper. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adorno, T.W. (1951). Minima Moralia. Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [Google Scholar]
  3. Althusser, L. (1993). Écrits sur la psychanalyse. Freud et Lacan. Paris: Stock/Imec. [Google Scholar]
  4. Althusser, L. (1995). Sur la reproduction. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
  5. Angermuller, J. (2013a). Analyse du discours poststructuraliste. Les voix du sujet dans le langage chez Lacan, Althusser, Foucault, Derrida et Sollers. Limoges: Lambert Lucas. [Google Scholar]
  6. Angermuller, J. (2013b). ‘How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice’, Sociología histórica, 3, pp. 263–289. [Google Scholar]
  7. Angermuller, J. (2013c). Le Champ de la Théorie. Essor et déclin du structuralisme en France. Paris: Hermann. [Google Scholar]
  8. Angermuller, J. (2015). ‘Discourse Studies’, in Wright, J.D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 510–515. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Angermuller, J. (2018). ‘Accumulating discursive capital, valuating subject positions. From Marx to Foucault’, Critical Discourse Studies, 15(4), pp. 415–425. [Google Scholar]
  10. Angermuller, J. (2020). in De Fina, A. and Georgakopolou, A. (eds) Poststructuralist Discourse Studies: from structure to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, pp. 235–254. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ashmore, M. (1989). The Reflexive Thesis. Writing Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Authier-Revuz, J. (1982). ‘Hétérogénéité montrée et hétérogénéité constitutive. Éléments pour une approche de l’autre dans le discours’, DRLAV, 26, pp. 91–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  14. Benveniste, É. (1974). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  15. Berrendonner, A. (1981). Eléments de pragmatique linguistique. Paris: Minuit. [Google Scholar]
  16. Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bühler, K. (1965). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer. [Google Scholar]
  18. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cap, P. (2008). ‘Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), pp. 17–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Charaudeau, P. (1997). Le Discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social. Paris: Nathan. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chilton, P. (2017). ‘Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist [Google Scholar]
  22. discourse of Donald Trump’, Langage et societe, 160161(2), pp. 237–249. [Google Scholar]
  23. Conein, B. et al. (1981). Matérialités discursives, Actes du Colloque des 24-26 avril 1980, Paris X-Nanterre. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille. [Google Scholar]
  24. Culioli, A. (2002). Variations sur la linguistique. Entretiens avec Frédéric Fau. Paris: Klincksieck. [Google Scholar]
  25. Demata, M. (2020). ‘Populism and nationalism in Jeremy Corbyn’s discourse’, in Discursive Approaches to Populism across Disciplines. The Return of Populists and the People. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 253–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Du Bois, J.W. (2007). ‘The stance triangle’, in Englebretson, R. (ed.) Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ducrot, O. (1984). Le Dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit. [Google Scholar]
  29. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman. [Google Scholar]
  30. Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  31. Foucault, M. (1969). L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  32. Foucault, M. (2004). Territoire, population, sécurité. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  33. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
  34. Grey, C. (2021). Brexit Unfolded: How no one got what they wanted (and why they were never going to). La Vergne: Biteback Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hall, S. et al. (1980). Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson. [Google Scholar]
  37. Harré, R. and Davies, B. (1990). ‘Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), pp. 43–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Henkel, I. (2021). Destructive storytelling: disinformation and the Eurosceptic myth that shaped brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hicks, D. and Potter, J. (1991). ‘Sociology of scientific knowledge. A reflexive citation analysis or Science disiplines and disciplining sciences’, Social Studies of Science, 21(3), pp. 459–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990). Les Interactions verbales. T I-III. Paris: Armand Colin. [Google Scholar]
  42. Knorr Cetina, K. (2009). ‘The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World’, Symbolic Interaction, 32(1), pp. 61–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Koller, V., Kopf, S. and Miglbauer, M. (2019). Discourses of Brexit. 1st edn. Milton: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits. Paris: Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lacan, J. (1978). Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse. Le séminaire, Livre II. Paris: Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  46. Laclau, E. (1994). The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso. [Google Scholar]
  47. Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London, New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  48. Langacker, R.W. (2010). Grammar and Conceptualization, Grammar and Conceptualization. De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  49. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lyons, J. (1982). ‘Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum?’, in Robert, J. and Klein, W. (eds) Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. New York: Wiley, pp. 101–124. [Google Scholar]
  51. Maingueneau, D. (1987). Nouvelles Tendances en analyses du discours. Paris: Hachette. [Google Scholar]
  52. Maingueneau, D. and Cossutta, F. (1995). ‘L’analyse des discours constituants’, Langages, 117, pp. 112–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mead, G.H. (1967). Mind, Self, & Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pêcheux, M. (1969). Analyse automatique du discours. Paris: Dunod. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pêcheux, M. (1975). Les Vérités de La Palice. Paris: Maspero. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rawlinson, F. (2020). How Press Propaganda Paved the Way to Brexit. 1st ed. 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. [Google Scholar]
  57. Récanati, F. (1987). Meaning and force: the pragmatics of performative utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Schegloff, E. (1997). ‘Whose Text? Whose Context?’, Discourse & Society, 8(2), pp. 165–187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sitri, F. (1996). ‘Interdiscours et construction de l’objet de discours’, Linx. Revue des linguistes de l’université Paris X Nanterre, (8), pp. 153–172. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sum, N.-L. and Jessop, B. (2013) Towards a Cultural Political Economy. Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  62. White, P. (2015). Appraisal Theory. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041 (13 January 2022). [Google Scholar]
  63. Zappettini, F. and Krzyżanowski, M. (2019). ‘The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses: from national-populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis’, Critical discourse studies, 16(4), pp. 381–388. doi:10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Žižek, S. (1991). Looking Awry. An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.