Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 08006
Number of page(s) 14
Section Phonétique, phonologie et interfaces
Published online 11 May 2022
  1. Armstrong, N. et Unsworth, Sh. (1999). Sociolinguistic variation in Southern French schwa. Linguistics, 37:1, 127-156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coquillon, A. et Turcsan, G. (2012). An overview of the phonological and phonetic properties of Southern French. Data from two Marseille surveys. Phonological Variation in French: Illustrations from three Continents (Gess, R., Lyche, Ch. et Meisenburg, T., éds.). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 105-128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Draxler, Ch. (2011). Percy – an HTML5 framework for media rich web experiments on mobile devices. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2011), Florence, 3339-3340. [Google Scholar]
  4. Durand, J., Slater, C., et Wise, H. (1987). Observations on schwa in Southern French. Linguistics, 25:5, 983-1004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eychenne, J. (2019). On the deletion of word-final schwa in Southern French. Phonology, 36:3, 355-389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word. Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 19:3, 273-309. [Google Scholar]
  7. Martinet, A. (1945). La prononciation du français contemporain. Témoignages recueillis en 1941 dans un camp d’officiers prisonniers. Genève: Librairie Droz. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mazel, J. (1975). Français standard et français d’oc. Cahiers du Groupe de Recherche sur la Diglossie (Lengas), 2, 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  9. R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienne: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sichel-Bazin, R. (2016). Le français du Midi: Une variété de français à accent lexical. Langue française, 191: 3, 47-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thomas, A. (2006). L’évolution des variantes phonétiques méridionales dans le sud-est de la France. La linguistique, 42, 53-72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Watbled, J.-Ph. (1995). Segmental and suprasegmantal structure in Southern French. Linguistic Theory and the Romance Languages (Smith, J. Ch. et Maiden, M., éds.). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 181-200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., D’Agostino McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., Kuhn, M., Lin Pedersen, Th., Miller, E., Milton Bache, S., Müller, K., Ooms, J., Paige Seidel, D., Robinson, D., Spinu, V., Takahashi, K., Vaughan, D., Wilke, C., Woo, K., et Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4:43, 1686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Winkelmann, R., Jaensch, K., Cassidy, S., et Harrington, J. (2021). emuR: Main package of the EMU Speech Database Management System. R package version 2.3.0. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.