EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 138 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 138 (2022) 09007 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 09007
Number of page(s) 17
Section Psycholinguistique et acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213809007
Published online 11 May 2022
  1. Aliquot-Suengas, S. (1996). Référence collective / sens collectif. La notion de collectif à travers les noms suffixés du lexique français. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Lille III. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aliquot-Suengas, S. (2003). Les dérivés français à référence collective. Langages, 152, 33-50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 232, 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beyersmann, E., Grainger, J., Casalis, S., & Ziegler, J. (2015). Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 115-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloom, P., and Kelemen, D. (1995). Syntactic Cues in the Acquisition of Collective Nouns. Cognition, 56-1, 1-30. [Google Scholar]
  6. Borillo, A. (1997). Statut et mode d’interprétation des noms collectifs. In Guimier C. (éd.). Cotexte et calcul du sens. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen, 105-121. [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlisle, J.F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12 (3-4), 169-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Colé, P., Bouton, S., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2012). Stem and Derivational-Suffix Processing During Reading by French Second and Third Graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 97-120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dawson, N., Rastle, K., & Ricketts, J. (2018). Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(4), 645-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000485 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dubois, J. et Dubois-Charlier, F. (1996). Collectifs d’êtres vivants. Linx, 34-35, 125-132. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Thériault-Whalen, C. M. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody: EVIP. Toronto: PSYCAN. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fayol, M. & Jaffré, J.P. (2014). Le traitement de la morphologie: flexions et dérivations. In Fayol M. (éd.). L'orthographe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 90-122. [Google Scholar]
  14. Flaux, N. (1998). Les noms collectifs et la prédication. In Forsgren M., Jonasson K. et Kronning H. (éds). Prédication, assertion, information. Actes du colloque d’Uppsala (juin 1996). Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 173-183. [Google Scholar]
  15. Flaux, N. (1999). À propos des noms collectifs. Revue de linguistique romane, 63, 471-502. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gardelle, L. (2017). Are superordinates such as furniture and belongings collective nouns? Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 40.2, 150-172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gil, D. (1996). Maltese ‘collective nouns’: a typological perspective. Rivista di Linguistica, 8-1, 53-87. [Google Scholar]
  18. Guillaume, G. (1964). Langage et science du langage. Paris: Nizet. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillon, B.S. (1992). Towards a Common Semantics for English Count and Mass Nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15-6, 597-639. [Google Scholar]
  20. Iris, M. A., Litowitz, B. E., Evens, M. W. (1988). Problems of the part-whole relation. In Evens M. W. (ed.). Relational models of the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 261-288. [Google Scholar]
  21. Joosten, F. (2006). Why club and lingerie do not belong together. A plea for redefining collective nouns. In Kleiber G., Schnedecker C. et Theissen A. (éds). La Relation partie-tout. Paris-Louvain: Peeters, 73-88. [Google Scholar]
  22. Joosten, F., De Sutter, G., Drieghe, D.; Grondelaers, S., Hartsuiker, R. J, Speelman, D. (2007). Dutch collective nouns and conceptual profiling, Linguistics, 45, 1, 85-132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kleiber, G. (2001). L’Anaphore associative. Paris: PUF. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lammert, M. (2010). Sémantique et cognition: les noms collectifs. Genève: Droz. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lammert, M. et Lecolle, M. (2014). Les noms collectifs en français, un état des lieux. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 105, 203-222. [Google Scholar]
  26. Landman, F. (1989). Groups. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, part I, 559-605, in n°5, part II, 723-744 in n°6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lecolle, M. (2019). Les noms collectifs humains en français. Enjeux sémantiques, lexicaux et discursifs. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lefavrais, P. (2005). Alouette-R: test d'analyse de la vitesse en lecture à partir d'un texte. Paris: Les Éditions du centre de psychologie appliquée. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L. & Colé, P. (2004). Manulex: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156-166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lété, B., Zagar, D., Pynte, J. (1994). A New Paradigm for Studying Word Recognition During Reading-Explorations with Word Frequency Effects. International Journal of Psychology, 29(3), 291-318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., and Deacon, S. H. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44, 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Markman, E.M. (1973). The Facilitation of Part-Whole Comparisons by Use of the Collective Noun “Family”. Child development, 44, 837-840. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Markman, E.M., Horton, M.S., McLanahan, A.G. (1980). Classes and Collections: Principles of Organization in the Learning of Hierarchical Relations. Cognition, 8, 227-241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2003). The development of comprehension skills. In P. Bryant (ed.), Handbook of Children’s Literacy. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 155-180. [Google Scholar]
  35. Oakhill, J., Cain, K., McCarthy, D. & Nightingale, Z. (2012). Making the link between vocabulary knowledge and comprehension skill. In Britt A., Goldman S., & Rouet J.-F. (eds), From words to reading for understanding. New York: Routledge, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ortega, É. & Lété, B. (2010). eManulex: Electronic version of Manulex and Manulex-infra databases. Retrieved from http://www.manulex.org. [Google Scholar]
  37. Perfetti, C. (2010). Decoding, Vocabulary, and Comprehension. The Golden Triangle of Reading Skill. In McKeown M. G. & Kucan L. (eds), Bringing Reading Research to Life. New York: Guilford, 291-302. [Google Scholar]
  38. Quinn, J.M., Wagner, R.K., Petscher, Y. & Lopez, D. (2015). Developmental relations between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension: a latent change score modeling study. Child Development, 86(1), 159-175. [Google Scholar]
  39. Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478496. [Google Scholar]
  40. Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.-F., Oakhill, J. V., & Yuill, N. M. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13 (1-2), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008088230941 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sparks, E., & Deacon, H. (2015). Morphological awareness and vocabulary acquisition: A longitudinal examination of their relationship in English-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 299-321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Thévenin, M.-G., Totereau, C., Fayol, M., Jarousse, J.-P. (1999). L’apprentissage/enseignement de la morphologie écrite du nombre en français. Revue française de pédagogie, 126, 39-52. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1101_2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wagner, R.K., Muse, A. E. & Tannenbaum, K. R. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension. Guilford Press, 52-77. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wechsler, D., Pearson Education, Inc., & Psychological Corporation. (2014). WISC-V: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. San Antonio, Tex: NCS Pearson, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  46. Winston, M.E., Chaffin, R. & Herrmann, D. (1987). A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations. Cognitive Science, 11, 417-444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.