EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 138 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 138 (2022) 10004 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10004
Number of page(s) 14
Section Ressources et outils pour l’analyse linguistique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213810004
Published online 11 May 2022
  1. Adda-Decker, M. & Lamel, L. (1998). Pronunciation variants across systems, languages and speaking style. Proceedings of Modeling Pronunciation Variation, pp. 1-6 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adda-Decker, M., Boula de Mareüil, Ph., Adda, G. & Lamel, L. (2005). Investigating syllabic structures and their variation in spontaneous French. Speech Communication, vol. 46, no 2, p. 119-139 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adda-Decker, M. & Lamel, L. (2005). Do speech recognizers prefer female speakers? Interspeech 2005: 2205-2208 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adda-Decker, M., Fougeron, C., Gendrot, C., Delais-Roussarie, E. & L. Lamel. (2012). La liaison dans la parole spontanée familière: une étude sur grand corpus, Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, vol. 17, no 1, p. 113-128, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ågren, J. (1973). Étude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique: fréquence et facteurs. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashby, W., J. (1981). French liaison as a sociolinguistic Phenomenon. In William W. Cressy and Donna Jo Napoli (ed.). Linguistic Symposium on romance languages 9. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 46-57. [Google Scholar]
  7. Booij, G. & De Jong, D. (1987). The domain of liaison: theories and data. Linguistics, 25, 1005-1025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Coleman, J., Renwick, M., & Temple, R. (2016). Probabilistic underspecification in nasal place assimilation. Phonology, 33(3), 425-458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Delattre, P. (1947). La liaison en français, tendances et classification. The French Review, 21(2), 148-157 [Google Scholar]
  10. Durand, J., Laks, B., Calderone, B. & Tchobanov, A. (2011). Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd’hui? Langue Française, 169, 1, 103-126 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Durand, J. & Lyche, C. (2008). French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies, 18(1), 33-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269507003158 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dutrey, C., Adda-Decker, M., Yamaguchi, N. (2016). Alignement de séquences phonétiques pour une analyse phonologique des erreurs de transcription automatique. Actes de La Conférence Conjointe JEP-TALN-RECITAL 2016. Volume 1: JEP. pp. 46–54 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ernestus, M., & Warner, N. (2011). An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants [Editorial]. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(11)00055-6 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eychenne, J., Lyche, C., Durand, J. & Coquillon, A. (2014). Quelles données pour la liaison aujourd’hui: la question des corpus, dans C. Soum, A. Coquillon & J.-P. Chevrot (eds) La liaison: approches contemporaines, Bern: Peter Lang, 33-60 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fosler-Lussier, E. & Morgan, N. (1999). Effects of speaking rate and word frequency on pronunciations in conversational speech. Speech Communication 29, 137–158 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Galliano, S., Geoffrois, E., Mostefa, D., Choukri, K., Bonastre, J.-F. & Gravier, J. (2005). ESTER Phase II Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Broadcast Newshase II Evaluation Campaign for the Rich Transcription of French Broadcast News. Interspeech 2005, 2453–2456 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gauvain, J.-L., Lamel, Lori & Adda, G. (2002). The LIMSI broadcast news transcription system. Speech communication 37 (1-2), 89–108 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldwater, S., Jurafsky, D. & Manning, C. D. (2009). Which words are hard to recognize? Prosodic, lexical, and disfluency factors that increase speech recognition error rates. Speech Communication 52 (2010) 181–200 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gravier, G., Adda, G., Paulson, N., Carré, M., Giraudel, A. & Galibert, O. (2012). The ETAPE corpus for the evaluation of speech-based TV content processing in the French language. Proceedings of LREC Eighth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation [Google Scholar]
  20. Hallé, P. & Adda-Decker, M. (2007). Voicing assimilation in journalistic speech. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 2007, 493–496 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hallé, P. & Adda-Decker, M. (2011). Voice assimilation in French obstruents: A gradient or a categorical process? Tones and features: A festschrift for Nick Clements, De Gruyter, 149–175 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A., & Wei, L. (2010). Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(2), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3459842 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Malécot, A. (1975). French liaison as a function of grammatical, phonetic and paralinguistic variables. Phonetica, 32, 161-179 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mallet, G. (2008). La liaison en français: descriptions et analyses dans le corpus PFC. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris Ouest-Nanterre-La Défense [Google Scholar]
  25. Maschler, Y. & Schiffrin, D. (2015). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 189-221 [Google Scholar]
  26. Shinozaki, T. & Furui, S. (2001). Error analysis using decision trees in spontaneous presentation speech recognition. Proceedings of ASRU 2001 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shriberg, E. E. (1994). Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfluencies. PhD dissertation. University of California at Berkeley [Google Scholar]
  28. Siegler, M. & Stern, R. (1995). On the effects of speech rate in large vocabulary speech recognition systems. Proceedings of ICASSP [Google Scholar]
  29. Torreira F., Adda-Decker M. & Ernestus M. (2010). The Nijmegen Corpus of Casual French. Speech Communication, Elsevier: North-Holland, 2010, 52(3) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vasilescu, I., Rosset, S. & Adda-Decker, M. (2010). On the role of discourse markers in interactive spoken question answering systems. Proceedings of LREC'10 [Google Scholar]
  31. Webb, E. (2009). Minimalism and French /ʀ/: Phonological representations in phonetically based phonology. Journal of French Language Studies, 19(1), 87-115. doi:10.1017/S095926950800358X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wu, Y. & Adda-Decker, M. (2021). Réduction des segments en français spontané: apports des grands corpus et du traitement automatique de la parole. Corpus, no 22, 2021 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.