EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 138 (2022) SHS Web Conf., 138 (2022) 10003 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10003
Number of page(s) 14
Section Ressources et outils pour l’analyse linguistique
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213810003
Published online 11 May 2022
  1. accès au corpus: http://www.langage-corpora.org [Google Scholar]
  2. LaBB-CAT = Fromont, R. (2012–2021). LaBB-CAT: Language, Brain & Behaviour Corpus Analysis Tool. University of Canterbury (NZ): New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour. https://labbcat.canterbury.ac.nz/system/ (01.12.2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. Abouda, L. & M. Skrovec. (2018). Pour une micro-diachronie de l’oral: le corpus ESLO-MD. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 6. art. 11004 [1-11]. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184611004. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ash, S. (2013). Social Class. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 350–367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baude, O. & C. Dugua. (2011). (Re)faire le corpus d’Orléans quarante ans après: ‘quoi de neuf, linguiste?’. Corpus 10. 99–118. https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.203610.4000/corpus.2036. Bergounioux, G. (2010). Mai 68 vu d’Orléans: la geste et la parole. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2. 1859–1875.https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf/2010104. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergounioux, G., J. Baraduc & C. Dumont. (1992). L’Etude Socio-Linguistique sur Orléans (1966–1991): 25 ans d’histoire d’un corpus. Langue française 1. 74–93. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1992.5812. [Google Scholar]
  7. Biggs, P. & M. Dalwood. (1978). Les Orléanais ont la parole. München: Langenscheidt-Hachette. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boersma, P. & D. Weenink. [2021]. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. PRAAT. http://www.praat.org. [Google Scholar]
  9. Buchstaller, I. & S. E. Wagner. (2017). Introduction: Using Panel Data in the Sociolinguistic Study of Variation and Change. In S. E. Wagner & I. Buchstaller (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change, 1–18. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  10. ESLO = Laboratoire Ligérien de Linguistique. (2014). Enquêtes SocioLinguistiques à Orléans ; ESLO1: Corpus linguistique 1968–1974; ESLO2: 2008–2014. Université d’Orléans: LLL. http://eslo.huma-num.fr/http://eslo.huma-num.fr/ [Google Scholar]
  11. FAIR = GO FAIR International Support and Coordination Office. (2021). FAIR Principles. Leiden (NL), Paris (F), Hamburg (D): GO FAIR. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/ (01.12.2021) [Google Scholar]
  12. Flamein, H. & I. Eshkol-Taravella. (2021). Exploitation du corpus Enquêtes sociolinguistiques à Orléans (ESLO) par les outils du traitement automatique des langues et de la géomatique. Humanités numériques 3. https://doi.org/10.4000/revuehn.1911. [Google Scholar]
  13. Frankenberg, C., J. Weiner, M. Knebel, A. Abulimiti, P. Toro, C. J. Herold, T. Schultz & J. Schröder. (2021). Verbal fluency in normal aging and cognitive decline: Results of a longitudinal study. Computer Speech & Language 68. 101195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2021.101195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fromont, R. (2019). Forced Alignment of Different Language Varieties using LaBB-CAT. Inter-national Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2019. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphsproceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_1376.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. Fromont, R. & J. Hay. (2012). LaBB-CAT: an Annotation Store. In P. Cook & S. Nowson (eds.), Proceedings of Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2012, 113–117. Dunedin (NZ): Otago University. https://aclanthology.org/U12-1015.pdf (01.12.2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuchs, S., L. L. Koenig & A. Gerstenberg. (2021). A Longitudinal Study of Speech Acoustics in Older French Females: Analysis of the Filler Particle euh across Utterance Positions. Languages 6(4). 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gerstenberg, A. (2011). Generation und Sprachprofile im höheren Lebensalter: Untersuchungen zum Französischen auf der Basis eines Korpus biographischer Interviews. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gerstenberg, A. (2015). A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Vocabulary Richness in a Seven-Year Comparison of Older Adults. In A. Gerstenberg & A. Voeste (eds.), Language Development: the Lifespan Perspective, 109–127. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.37.06ger. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gerstenberg, Annette, Valerie Hekkel & Julie Kairet. 2018. Corpus LangAge: Transcription Guide. University of Potsdam: Department of Romance Studies. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6444538. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerstenberg, A. & H. E. Hamilton. (2022). Older adults’ conversations and the emergence of ‘narrative crystals’: A new approach to frequently told stories. Narrative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21075.ger. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gerstenberg, A. & J. Kairet. (2021). Prosodic Features and Situational Settings: Doing Reading Aloud in a French Writing Class. In A. Teixeira Kalkhoff, M. Selig & C. Mooshammer (eds.), Prosody and Conceptional Variation, 141–156. Frankfurt am Main: Lang. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gerstorf, D., G. Hülür, J. Drewelies, P. Eibich, S. Duezel, I. Demuth, P. Ghisletta, E. Steinhagen-Thiessen, G. G. Wagner & U. Lindenberger. (2015). Secular changes in late-life cognition and well-being: Towards a long bright future with a short brisk ending? Psychology and Aging 30(2). 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hekkel, V. (2021). Eine soziolinguistische Betrachtung von parce que-Strukturen in Synchronie und Diachronie. Universität Potsdam: publishUP. https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-51396. [Google Scholar]
  25. Higman, R., D. Bangert & S. Jones. (2019). Three camps, one destination: the intersections of research data management, FAIR and Open. Insights 32(18). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.468. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hirst, D. (2013). Anonymising Long Sounds for Prosodic Research. In B. Bigi & D. Hirst (eds.), Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody. TRASP 2013, 36–37. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage. http://www2.lpl-aix.fr/~trasp/Proceedings/19906-trasp2013.pdf (01.12.2021) [Google Scholar]
  27. INA (ed.). 1969. Affaire classée? – Un reportage de Jacques et Maurice Gugowson ; Pierre André [Documentation vidéo de 1969, publié le 29.03.2019, mis à jour le 08.07.2021]. Paris: Institut national de l’audiovisuel. https://www.ina.fr/contenus-editoriaux/articles-editoriaux/1969-larumeur-d-orleans-un-retour-au-moyen-age/ (01.12.2021). [Google Scholar]
  28. Krause, T. & A. Zeldes. (2016). ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31(1). 118–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kairet, J. (2019). Silent Pause Duration and Distribution in Older Womens’ Speech: a Case Study with 4 Within-speaker Comparison. In O. Niebuhr, J. Neitsch, S. Berger, K. Fischer, J. Michalsky, S. Eisenberger & M. Jelínek (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on the Foundations of Speech – Pausing, Breathing and Voice. University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark, December 1–3, 2019, vol. 1, 61–63. Sønderborg: University of Southern Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  30. Labov, W. & J. Auger. 1993. The Effect of Normal Aging on Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Approach. In H. H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (eds.) Narrative Discourse in Neurologically Impaired and Normal Aging Adults, 115–133. San Diego (CA): Singular. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lonergan, J., J. Kay & J. Ross. (1974). Étude sociolinguistique sur Orléans. Catalogue d’enregistrements. Colchester: Typoscript. [Google Scholar]
  32. Luo, M., M. Neysari, G. Schneider, M. Martin & B. Demiray. (2020). Linear and Non-Linear Age Trajectories of Language Use: A Laboratory Observation Study of Couples’ Conflict Conversations. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa041. [Google Scholar]
  33. Messer, R. H. 2015. Pragmatic Language Changes During Normal Aging: Implications for Health Care. Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly 7. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4137/HaCCe.S22981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Milroy, L. & M. J. Gordon. (2003). Sociolinguistics. Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mullineaux, A. & M. Blanc. (1982). The Problem of Classifying the Population Sample in the Sociolinguistic Survey of Orleans (1969) in Terms of Socio-Economic, Social and Educational Categories. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics (55). 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.55.01mul. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pagenstecher, C. (2020). Oral-History.Digital – Interviewsammlungen als Forschungsdaten. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pichler, H., S. E. Wagner & A. Hesson. (2018). Old-age Language Variation and Change: Confronting Variationist Ageism. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(6)., 1–21. 10.1111/lnc3.12281. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pope, C. & B. H. Davis. (2011). Finding a Balance: The Carolinas Conversation Collection. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1). 546. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2011.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sankoff, G. 2017. Before There Were Corpora. In S. Wagner & I. Buchstaller (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change, 21–51. New York: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt, T. & K. Wörner. (2014). EXMARaLDA. In J. Durand, U. Gut & G. Kristoffersen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (Oxford handbooks in linguistics), 402–419. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571932.013.030. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sillars, A. L. & P. H. Zietlow. (1993). Investigations of Marital Communication and Lifespan Development. In N. Coupland & J. Nussbaum (eds.), Discourse and Lifespan Identity, 237–261. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  42. Slembrouck, S. (2015). The Role of the Researcher in Interview Narrative. In: A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 237–254. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  43. Specht, J., W. Bleidorn, J. J. Denissen, M. Hennecke, R. Huttemann, C. Kandler, M. Luhmann, U. Orth, A. K. Reitz, J. Zimmermann, J. J. A. Denissen & R. Hutteman. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality 28(3). 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Synapse. (2008). Cordial Analyseur version 14.0. Paris: Synapse Développement. [Google Scholar]
  45. TUSTEP. (2021). Tübinger System von Textverarbeitungs-Programmen. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen; Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wagner, S. E. & S. A. Tagliamonte. (2017). What Makes a Panel Study Work? Researcher and Participant in Real Time. In: S. Wagner & I. Buchstaller (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change, 213–232. New York: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.