Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 148, 2022
The 2nd International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2022)
Article Number 02024
Number of page(s) 8
Section Research and Discussion of Public Administration and Humanities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214802024
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. Ken, Hyland. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing [M]. London: Continuum, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yulian, Chen. & Yingxian, Zhang. Analysis of Metadiscourse in Speeches by Women and Its Rhetorical Functions — Taking Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Speech as an Example[J]. Journal of Shanxi Datong University (Social Science), 2017(03): 72-78. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wenqian, Che. A Study on the Persuasive Function or Metadiscourse in Speeches of UN Women on Gender Equality[D]. Central China Normal University, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ana, Albalat-Mascarell. & María Luisa, CarrioPastor. Self-representation in Political Campaign Talk: A Functional Metadiscourse Approach to Selfmentions in Televised Presidential Debates[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2019(147): 86-99. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hao, Li. The Use of Metadiscourse for Persuasion in Belf Meetings[D]. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hong, Xu. & Xuejuan, Liu. Construction of Metadiscourse Rhetorical Persuasion Function in Russian Political Discourse — A Case Study of Putin’s 2019 State of the Union Speech[J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 2020(03): 100-108. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xiaoyan, Wu. A Study on Persuasive Functions of Metadiscourse in Public Persuasive Speech[D]. Shanghai International Studies University, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lide, Han. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Second Edition) [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  9. Christof, Rapp. Aristotle’s Rhetoric. 2010. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/ [Google Scholar]
  10. Qing, li. & Gaiying, Chai. A Study of Contemporary Western Rhetorical Criticism [M]. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ken, Hyland. Metadiscourse [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  12. James J, Murphy. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance (Volume 227) [M]. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  13. James A, Aho. Rhetoric and the Invention of Double Entry Bookkeeping [J]. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 1985(3): 21-43. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruiting, Song. A Study of Rhetorical Function of Metadiscourse in English Political Speaking [D]. Jiangxi Normal University, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aristotle. Rhetoric [M]. Tbilisi: TSU, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bin, Xin., Jianxin, Ding. & Yufang, Qian. Research on New Findings of Critical Discourse Analysis [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chinese Bilingual Documents. http://www.china.org.cn/chinese/node_7245066.htm. 2014-2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. Laurence Anthony’s Website. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kenneth, Burke. A Rhetoric of Motives [M]. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, 1969. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.