EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 155 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 155 (2023) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 155, 2023
2022 2nd International Conference on Social Development and Media Communication (SDMC 2022)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Research on Social Development and Humanities Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315501005
Published online 12 January 2023
  1. Nieman, D. C., & Pedersen, B. K. (1999). Exercise and immune function. Sports Medicine, 27(2), 73–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Martin, S. A., Pence, B. D., & Woods, J. A. (2009). Exercise and respiratory tract viral infections. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 37(4), 157. DOI: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181b7b57b [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, Y., & Koenigstorfer, J. (2020). Determinants of physical activity maintenance during the Covid-19 pandemic: a focus on fitness apps. Translational behavioral medicine, 10(4), 835–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa086 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mohiyeddini, C., Pauli, R., & Bauer, S. (2009). The role of emotion in bridging the intention - behaviour gap: The case of sports participation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(2), 226–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.08.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American journal of health promotion, 11(2), 87–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982–1003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. George, J. F. (2004). The theory of planned behavior and Internet purchasing. Internet research. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvp.2015.03.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, O. Y., Yam, C. L. Y., Cheung, N. S., Lee, P. L. P., Ngai, M. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2019). Extended theory of planned behavior on eating and physical activity. American Journal of Health Behavior, 43(3), 569–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.43.3.11 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liao, C., Chen, J. L., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2804–2822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human decision processes, 50(2), 179–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International journal of research in marketing, 12(2), 137–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiou, J. S. (1998). The effects of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on consumers’ purchase intentions: The moderating effects of product knowledge and attention to social comparison information. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc. ROC (C), 9(2), 298–308. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bandura, A. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 13(3), 195–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Finlay, K. A., Trafimow, D., & Jones, D. (1997). Predicting health behaviors from attitudes and subjective norms: Between-subjects and within-subjects analyses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(22), 2015–2031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Finlay, K. A., Trafimow, D., & Moroi, E. (1999). The importance of subjective norms on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2381–2393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 151–192. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, J. R., Louis, W. R., Terry, D. J., Greenaway, K. H., Clarke, M. R., & Cheng, X. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gelfand, M. J., & Harrington, J. R. (2015). The motivational force of descriptive norms: For whom and when are descriptive norms most predictive of behavior?. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1273–1278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Varshney, D., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2021). A review on rumour prediction and veracity assessment in online social network. Expert Systems with Applications, 168, 114208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114208 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wong, A., Ho, S., Olusanya, O., Antonini, M. V., & Lyness, D. (2021). The use of social media and online communications in times of pandemic COVID-19. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 22(3), 255–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143720966280 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Friedman, D. B., Gibson, A., Torres, W., Irizarry, J., Rodriguez, J., Tang, W., & Kannaley, K. (2016). Increasing community awareness about Alzheimer’ s disease in Puerto Rico through coffee shop education and social media. Journal of Community Health, 41(5), 1006–1012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bicen, H., & Arnavut, A. (2015). Determining the effects of technological tool use habits on social lives. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 457–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. McGuire, W. J. (1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In R. E. Rice, & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (2nd ed., pp. 43–65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 94–124). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, L., & Fu, L. (2022). Let’s fight the infodemic: the third-person effect process of misinformation during public health emergencies. Internet Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2021-0194 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunne, A., Lawlor, M. A., & Rowley, J. (2010). Young people’s use of online social networking sites - a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Research in interactive Marketing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17505931011033551 [Google Scholar]
  30. Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2020). A 2020 perspective on “ How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective”. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 40, 100958. DOI: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.100958 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Skoric, M. M., & Poor, N. (2013). Youth engagement in Singapore: The interplay of social and traditional media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(2), 187–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.787076 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaplanidou, K., & Gibson, H. J. (2012). Event image and traveling parents’ intentions to attend youth sport events: a test of the reasoned action model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 12(1), 3–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2011.637173 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ho, S. S., Chen, L., & Ng, A. P. (2017). Comparing cyberbullying perpetration on social media between primary and secondary school students. Computers & Education, 109, 74–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim, Y. J., & Kim, E. S. (2021). Analysis of Korean Fencing Club Members’ Participation Intention Using the TPB Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062813 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim, B., Son, S., Kim, H., Nah, S., & Mu Lee, K. (2017). Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (pp. 136–144). [Google Scholar]
  37. Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., Zafar, N., & Alrasheedy, M. (2019). Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jette, A. M., Harris, B. A., Sleeper, L., Lachman, M. E., Heislein, D., Giorgetti, M., & Levenson, C. (1996). A home -based exercise program for nondisabled older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics society, 44(6), 644–649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ho, S. S., & Chuah, A. S. (2022). Thinking, not talking, predicts knowledge level: Effects of media attention and reflective integration on public knowledge of nuclear energy. Public Understanding of Science, 31(5), 572–589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211070786 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.