EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 161 (2023) SHS Web Conf., 161 (2023) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 161, 2023
12th Kant-Readings International Conference “Kant and the Ethics of Enlightenment: Historical Roots and Contemporary Relevance”
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Kant and the History of Enlightenment Ethics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316102001
Published online 08 March 2023
  1. Ahnert, T., Décultot, E., Grote, S., Michelangelo-D’Aprile, I. and Lifschitz, A., 2017. The German Enlightenment. German History, 35(4), pp. 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerhis/ghx104 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angeloni, R., 2017. A Kantian Interpretation of Niels Bohr’s Early Correspondence Principle: 1917–1924. Studia Philosophica Estonica, 10(1), pp. 8–24. Available at: https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/spe/article/view/14481(Accessed: 11 July 2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. Aramayo, R. R., 2019. The Kantian Background to Cassirer’s Political Commitment and Its Parallelisms with Kant’s Republicanism and Support of the French Revolution. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 1(9), pp. 274–292. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3253113 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beiser, F.C., 2002. German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bronner, S.E., 2004. Reclaiming the Enlightenment: Toward a Politics of Radical Engagement . New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/bron12608 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cassirer, E., 2009. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Foreword by P. Gay. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Friedman, M., 2013. Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herder, J.G., 1803. Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man. London: J. Johnson. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalinnikov, L.A., 2021. About the Purpose Opus postumum in Kant’s Philosophical System. Voprosy Filosofii, 4, pp. 110–123. https://doi.org/10.21146/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-4-110-123 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kant, I., 1996. An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In: I. Kant, 1996.Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by M.J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-22. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kant, I., 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Revised Edition. Edited by P. Guyer, Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kant, I., 2012. Universal Natural History and Theory of the Heavens. In: I. Kant, 2012.Natural Science. Edited by E. Watkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klemme, H., ed. 2000. Reception of the Scottish Enlightenment in Germany: Six Significant Translations, 1755–1782. New York: Thoemmes Continuum & Bloomsbery Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  14. Klemme, H., ed. 2009. Kant und die Zukunft der europäischen Aufklärung. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kolakowski, L., 1997. Modernity on Endless Trial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kosellek, R., 1988. Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lugovoy, S.V., 2019. Kant’s Dissertation for the Master’s Degree On Fire and the Transformations of his Ideas of Ethereal Matter. Kantian Journal, 38(2), pp. 7–30.http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/0207-6918-2019-2-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marx, K., 1973. Grundrisse: Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by M. Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [Google Scholar]
  19. Renz, U., 2019. Cassirer’s Enlightenment: On Philosophy and the ‘Denkform’ of Reason.British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 28(3), pp. 636–652.https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2019.1677214 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sorkin, D.J., 2008. The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Taylor, C., 1991. The Malaise of Modernity. Toronto: Anansi Press. [Google Scholar]
  22. Watkins, E., 2001. Kant and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wokler, R., 2012. Ernst Cassirer’s Enlightenment: An Exchange with Bruce Mazlish. In: R. Wokler, 2012. Rousseau, the Age of Enlightenment, and Their Legacies. Edited by B. Garsten. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 233-243.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842407.233 [Google Scholar]
  24. Wood, A.W., 1991. Kant’s Deism. In: P.J. Rossi and M.J. Wreen, eds. 1991. Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1-22. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.