Open Access
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 161, 2023
12th Kant-Readings International Conference “Kant and the Ethics of Enlightenment: Historical Roots and Contemporary Relevance”
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Kant and the History of Enlightenment Ethics
Published online 08 March 2023
  1. Altmann, A., 1982. Die trostvolle Aufklärung. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beiser, F., 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dahlstrom, D., ed. 2018. Kant and his German Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deligiorgi, K., 2005. Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment. New York: SUNY Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Flikschuh, K., 2004. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Flikschuh, K., 2007. Duty, Nature, Right: Kant’s Response to Mendelssohn in Theory and Practice III. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 4(2), pp. 223–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guyer, P., 1991. Mendelssohn and Kant: One Source of the Critical Philosophy. Philosophical Topics, 19(1), pp. 119–152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hinske, N., 1973. Was ist Aufklärung? Beiträge aus der Berlinischen Monatsschrift. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hinske, N., 1981. Mendelssohns Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung oder Über die Aktualität Mendelssohns. In: N. Hinske, ed. 1981. Ich handle mit Vernunft: Moses Mendelssohn und die europäische Aufklärung. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 85-117. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kant, I., 1991. Political Writings. Edited by H. S. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kant, I., 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kant, I., 2007a. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by J.C. Meredith; revised, edited and introduced by N. Walker. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kant, I., 2007b. Anthropology, History, Education. Edited by G. Zöller and R. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. McQuillan, C., 2014. Oaths, Promises, and Compulsory Duties: Kant’s Response to Mendelssohn’s Jerusalem. Journal of the History of Ideas, 75(4), pp. 581–604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mendelssohn, M., 1983. Jerusalem or on Religious Power and Judaism. New England: Brandeis University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mendelssohn, M., 1997. Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mendelssohn, M., 2018. Écrits Juifs. Paris: Éditions Verdier. [Google Scholar]
  18. Schonfeld, E., 2018. L’Apologie de Mendelssohn. Paris: Éditions Verdier. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schonfeld, E., 2018. L’Apologie de Mendelssohn. Paris: Éditions Verdier. Schmidt, J., 1989. The Question of the Enlightenment: Kant, Mendelssohn, and the Mittwochgesellschaft. Journal of the History of Ideas, 50(2), pp. 269–291. [Google Scholar]
  20. Schmidt, J., ed. 1996. What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth- Century Questions. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schmidt, J., 2006. What Enlightenment Was, What It Still Might Be, and Why Kant May Have Been Right After All. American Behavioural Scientist, 49(5), pp. 647–663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sweet, K., 2018. Kant and Mendelssohn: Enlightenment, History, and the Authority of Reason. In: D. Dahlstrom, ed. 2018. Kant and his German Contemporaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131-149. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.