EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 178 (2023) SHS Web of Conf., 178 (2023) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web of Conf.
Volume 178, 2023
3rd International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2023)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Legal Regulation and Media Communication Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317802005
Published online 23 October 2023
  1. Humayun N. (2013, January 4). “The Impact of Social Media on Modern Society”. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Banda, K. K., & Cluverius, J. (2018). Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization. Electoral Studies, 56, 90–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morgan Kelly. (2021, September 12). Political polarization and its echo chambers: Surprising new, cross-disciplinary perspectives from Princeton. Princeton University. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kreiss, D. (2019). The social identity of journalists. Journalism, 20(1), 27–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological segregation online and offline. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1799-1839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Humayun N. (2013, January 4). “The Impact of Social Media on Modern Society”. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006). What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levendusky, M. S. (2018). Political polarization and the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 563-578. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wojcieszak, M., & Mutz, D. C. (2022). How group discussions with like-minded others can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(3), 1-6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35(1), 113–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing Qualitative Data. SAGE Publications, Ltd. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (Fourth edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  21. interactive chart. Ad Fontes Media. (2023, July 8). https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/#elementor-action%3Aaction%3Dpopup%3Aopen%26settings%3DeyJpZCI6IjQ3MDgyIiwidG9nZ2xlIjpmYWxz ZX0%3D. [Google Scholar]
  22. Interactive chart. Ad Fontes Media. (2023a, July 8). https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/#elementor-action%3Aaction%3Dpopup%3Aopen%26settings%3DeyJpZCI6IjQ3MDgyIiwidG9nZ2xlIjpmYWxzZX0%3D [Google Scholar]
  23. DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2019). The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(1), 1503-1544. [Google Scholar]
  24. Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2021). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 71(1), 22-40. [Google Scholar]
  25. DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2019). The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(1), 1503-1544. [Google Scholar]
  26. Stroud, N. J. (2020). Polarization in the news environment: Examining audience selective exposure and media trust. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 680-702. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2018). The third-person effect: A meta-analysis of the perceptual hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 197-224. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348 (6239), 1130-1132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, A. B. (2018). The effects of media consumption on political attitudes: A meta-analysis. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 173-194. [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith, R., & McDermott, R. (2020). Media exposure and political polarization: Evidence from the introduction of Fox News. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12(3), 224-251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stroud, N. J. (2020). Polarization in the news environment: Examining audience selective exposure and media trust. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 680-702. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.