Open Access
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 185, 2024
2024 2nd International Conference on Language and Cultural Communication (ICLCC 2024)
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 4
Section Research on Language Teaching and Text Reading
Published online 14 March 2024
  1. Pöchhacker, Franz. Introducing interpreting studies. Routledge, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pöchhacker, Franz. “Issues in interpreting studies.” The Routledge companion to translation studies. Routledge, 2009. 142–154. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gile, Daniel. “Interpreting studies: a critical view from within.” (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. Salevsky, Heidemarie. “The distinctive nature of interpreting studies.” Target 5.2 (1993): 149–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jacobson, Holly E., and Claudia V. Angelelli. “Testing and assessment in translation and interpreting studies.” Testing and assessment in translation and interpreting studies (2009): 1–392. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacobson, Jenna, and Brooke Harrison. “Sustainable fashion social media influencers and content creation calibration.” International Journal of advertising 41.1 (2022): 150–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerver, David, ed. Language interpretation and communication. Vol. 6. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Peter F., et al. “A statistical approach to language translation.” Coling Budapest 1988 Volume 1: International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  9. Neubert, Albrecht. “Competence in language, in languages, and in translation.” Benjamins Translation Library 38 (2000): 3–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gardner, George H. “Cross cultural communication.” The Journal of social psychology 58.2 (1962): 241-256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith, Larry, ed. English for cross-cultural communication. Springer, 1981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gudykunst, William B. Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Sage, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mead, Richard, and Colin J. Jones. “Cross‐cultural communication.” The Blackwell Handbook of Cross‐ Cultural Management (2017): 283–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.