EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 198 (2024) SHS Web Conf., 198 (2024) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 198, 2024
EduBIM2024 : Données, intelligences et nature de la ville durable
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 15
Section Conception assistée par les données
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419802002
Published online 11 October 2024
  1. I. Caetano, L. Santos, and A. Leitão (2020), Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9 (2), pp. 287–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J.E. Harding and P. Shepherd (2017), Meta-Parametric Design, Design Studies, 52, pp. 73–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Ma (2015), Invention architecturale et algorithmes non-lineaires, https://www.theses.fr/2015VERS023S. [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Zhao and E. de Angelis (2018), Performance-based Generative Architecture Design: A Review on Design Problem Formulation and Software Utilization, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science. 22(3), pp. 55–76. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Ma, X. Wang, J. Wang, X. Xiang, and J. Sun (2021), Generative Design in Building Information Modelling (BIM): Approaches and Requirements, Sensors. 21(16), pp. 5439. [Google Scholar]
  6. Generative Design Primer, https://www.generativedesign.org. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Shen, A. Singhvi, A. Mengual, M. Spastri, and V. Watson (2018), Evaluating the Multi-Objective Optimization Methodology for Performance-Based Building Design in Professional Practice, ASHRAE and IBPSA, pp. 646–653. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Bernal, V. Okhoya, T. Marshall, C. Chen, and J. Haymaker (2020), Integrating expertise and parametric analysis for a data-driven decision-making practice, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 18 (4), pp. 424–440. CUMINCAD. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Li, L. Liu, and C. Peng (2020), A review of performance-oriented architectural design and optimization in the context of sustainability: Dividends and challenges, Sustainability, 12 (4), pp. 1427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Duclos-Prévet, F. Guéna, and M. Efron (2022), Constraint handling methods for a generative envelope design using genetic algorithms: The case of a highly constrained problem, International Journal of Architectural Computing, 20 (3), pp. 587–609. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.A. Coello Coello (2002), Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191 (11), pp. 1245–1287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Michalewicz and M. Schoenauer (1996), Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems, Evolutionary computation. 4 (1), pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  13. C.A. Coello Coello (2016), Constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms. Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, pp. 563–587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Duclos-Prévet, F. Guéna, and M. Efron (2021), Constrained Multi-Criteria Optimization for Integrated Design in Professional Practice. Gomez, P. and Braida, F. (eds.), Designing Possibilities - Proceedings of the XXV International Conference of the Ibero-American Society of Digital Graphics (SIGraDi 2021), Online, 8-12 November 2021, pp. 29–40. CUMINCAD. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Salcedo-Sanz (2009), A survey of repair methods used as constraint handling techniques in evolutionary algorithms, Computer science review, 3 (3), pp. 175–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Smith, D. Coit, T. Bäck, D. Fogel, and Z. Michalewicz (1998), Penalty Functions. [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan (2002), A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, 6 (2), pp. 182–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Orvosh and L. Davis (1993), Shall We Repair? Genetic Algorithms Combinatorial Optimization and Feasibility Constraints, Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Stiny: Shape Rules (1994), Closure, Continuity, and Emergence,, Environ Plann B Plann Des, 21 (7), pp. S49–S78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Singh and N. Gu (2012), Towards an integrated generative design framework. Design Studies, 33 (2), pp. 185–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Ferber (1997), Les systèmes multi-agents: un aperçu général, Techniques et sciences informatiques, 16(8). [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Von Neumann and A.W. Burks (1966), Theory of self-reproducing automata IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5 (1), pp. 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Beni (2004), From swarm intelligence to swarm robotics, International Workshop on Swarm Robotics, pp. 1–9. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Hu, Z. Huang, Y. Tang, O. Van Kaick, H. Zhang, and H. Huang (2020), “Graph2Plan: learning floorplan generation from layout graphs”, ACM Trans. Graph. 39(4). [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Zheng and P.F. Yuan (2021), A generative architectural and urban design method through artificial neural networks, Building and Environment, 205, pp. 108–178. [Google Scholar]
  26. C.M. Macal (2016), Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation Journal of Simulation, 10 (2), pp. 144–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C.M. Macal and M.J. North (2005), Tutorial on agent-based modeling and simulation, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  28. M.S. Roudsari, M. Pak, and A. Smith (2013), Ladybug: a parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design, Proceedings of the 13th international IBPSA conference held in Lyon, France Aug. pp. 3128–3135. [Google Scholar]
  29. S.B. Parascho (2013), Design Tools for Integrative Planning Stouffs, Rudi and Sariyildiz, Sevil (eds.), Computation and Performance - Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe Conference, 2, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 18-20 September 2013, pp. 237–246. CUMINCAD. [Google Scholar]
  30. P.J.R. and R.K. Veloso (2019), Multi-agent space planning: a literature review (2008-2017). Ji-Hyun Lee (Eds.) “Hello, Culture!” [18th International Conference, CAAD Futures 2019, Proceedings / ISBN 978-89-89453-05-5] Daejeon, Korea, pp. 52–74. CUMINCAD. [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Koenig and G. Schmitt (2016), Backcasting and a New Way of Command in Computational Design, presented at the CAADence in Architecture. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. McCormack, A. Dorin, and T. Innocent (2004), Generative Design: A Paradigm for Design Research, DRS Biennial Conference Series. [Google Scholar]
  33. C. Duclos-Prévet, F. Guéna, and M. Efron (2022), Algorithme génétique ou automate cellulaire : le cas d’une optimisation multicritère sous contraintes pour la conception d’une enveloppe, SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.