EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 212 (2025) SHS Web Conf., 212 (2025) 04039 References
Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 212, 2025
1st International Conference on Advanced Research in Sustainable Economic and Social Science (ICARSESS-24)
Article Number 04039
Number of page(s) 10
Section Social Science for Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521204039
Published online 05 March 2025
  1. S. P. Sari, A. Munandar, and I. S. Fatimah, “Perception of Place Attachment Between Cultural Heritage in Yogyakarta City,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 179, no. 1, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/179/1/012012. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. A. Sudrajad and B. Wibisono, “Spatial Patterns of Islamic Religious Activities in Krapyak District, Yogyakarta,” Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 301–312, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia and Pemerintah Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, The Cosmological Axis of Yogyakarta and Its Historic Landmarks, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Agathis, A. Syahbudin, and R. H. Purwanto, “Alternative Strategies for Sustaining Yogyakarta Philosophy Axis and Impact on Community and The Environment,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 800, no. 1, 2021. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/800/1/012059. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. De Boer, “Diffusion or Diversity in Cultural Heritage Preservation? Comparing Policy Arrangements in Norway, Arizona and The Netherlands,” in Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance, pp. 161–181, 2006. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_8. [Google Scholar]
  6. S. G. Ross, “Heritage Preservation Easements, Urban Property, and Heritage Law: Exploring Canadian Common Law and Civil Law Tools for Responding to International Cultural Preservation Frameworks for Cities,” University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 436–467, 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Koželj, “Ethnologist and the Integral Approach to Cultural Heritage Protection,” Traditiones, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 201–220, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. K. Clark, T. B. Smith, and S. R. Seals, “Participatory Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Based Programming to Empower Communities: A Quantitative Analysis,” AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, vol. 9, pp. 65–90, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. A. Bychkov, K. K. Pavlenok, and A. V. Vybornov, “A Methodological Seminar ‘Preservation of The Objects of Archaeological Heritage of Russian Asia: Results and Trends’ (Novosibirsk, March, 4-5, 2019),” in Russian Archaeological Heritage Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 160–164, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-3-160-164. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. E. Ruiz, “Asset to the Heritage City: Legal Remedies in the 21st Century,” Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, vol. 54, pp. 1–23, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Giambruno and S. Pistidda, “The Relationships Between WHS, the Communities, and the Territories,” in SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, pp. 11–25, 2023. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20157-8_2. [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Longworth, “The Culture of Prevention: Heritage and Resilience,” in Climate Change as a Threat to Peace: Impacts on Cultural Heritage and Cultural Diversity, pp. 196–125, 2015. Available: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05205-3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. Shao, J. R. Razali, H. Hassan, and B. Pan, “A Study on the Influencing Factors of Social Media in the Communication of Cultural Heritage Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” Studies in Media and Communication, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 90–104, 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Effing and T. A. M. Spil, “The Social Strategy Cone: Towards a Framework for Evaluating Social Media Strategies,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Faraoni, R. Bandinelli, and R. Rinaldi, “Social Media Strategy in the Italian Fashion Industry: A New Model of Analysis,” in Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 413, pp. 253–269, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Shvelidze, T. Karavaieva, and Y. Tomchakovska, “How Communication Strategies Influence Conflict Development: A Case Study of Social Networks,” Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 4257–4268, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Selkie and M. A. Moreno, “Social Media as a New Venue for Aggression and Bullying,” Adolescent Medicine: State of the Art Reviews, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–275, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Rahmani, W. Wafa, and F. G. Mazloum Yar, “The Importance of Public Awareness in Environmental Protection: A Case Study in Paktika, Afghanistan,” Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1621–1626, 2021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Zhao, “Correlative Analysis of Public Environmental Awareness to Related Factors Based on Fuzzy Clustering and Grey Theory,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Science and Engineering, pp. 275–278, 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3180374.3181357. [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Sybord and P. Y. Badillo, “A New Model of Information System for Public Awareness About Wildfires,” in Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, pp. 623–632, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Nang’alelwa, “Public Awareness Activities on Eichhornia Crassipes in the Victoria Falls World Heritage Site, Livingstone, Zambia,” in Proceedings of the African Aquatic Weed Control Conference, pp. 464–469, 2008. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01265.x. [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Morgan and P. M. Pallascio, “Digital Media, Participatory Culture, and Difficult Heritage: Online Remediation and the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade,” Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 260–277, 2015.Sari P, Munandar A, Fatimah IS. Perception of Place Attachment Between Cultural Heritage in Yogyakarta City. In 2018. Available From: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/179/1/012012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Shao, J. R. Razali, H. Hassan, and B. Pan, “A Study on the Influencing Factors of Social Media in the Communication of Cultural Heritage Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” Stud. Media Commun., vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 90–104, 2023. doi: 10.11114/smc.v11i7.6296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. I. Stefania and P. George, “Conservation and Preservation Standards for Paintings,” in Springer Proceedings in Materials, 2024, pp. 147–158. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42239-3_13. [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Saputra, “Governance Frameworks and Cultural Preservation in Indonesia: Balancing Policy and Heritage,” Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 25–50, 2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Goud and V. Lombardo, “Assessment of Digital Environments for Cultural Heritage Communication,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Heritage, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-22298-6_8. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Bhatt and R. Dani, “Social Media and Community Engagement: Empowering Local Voices in Regenerative Tourism,” in Examining Tourist Behaviors and Community Involvement in Destination Rejuvenation, pp. 113–122, 2024. Available: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6819-0.ch009. [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Ograjenšek, “Theory and Practice of Qualitative Research,” in Research Methods for Postgraduates, 3rd ed., 2012, pp. 214–230. doi: 10.1002/9781118763025.ch22. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. A. Saip, M. A. Kamala, and R. Tassabehji, “Identifying Social Roles in a Local Government’s Digital Community,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 4.19, pp. 256–260, 2018. doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.19.22062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shao Y, Razali JR, Hassan H, Pan B. A Study on the Influencing Factors of Social Media in the Communication of Cultural Heritage Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Studies in Media and Communication. 2023;11(7):90–104. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i7.6296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Balai Pengelolaan Kawasan Sumbu Filosofis, The Cosmological Axis of Yogyakarta and Its Historic Landmarks; UNESCO World Heritage Site, 2023. Available: Instagram (@sumbufilosofi) and jogjaworldheritage.com. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.